I am in a similar boat except my buy price is .49c (still up the creek without a paddle) if this redomicile eventuates. I can’t see any positives in our current financial position anyway ? My plan is to set up a SMSF and transfer them into that, this way I shouldn’t be forced to sell at a loss and because they are currently under water there should be no CGT payable just a transfer fee I assume ? Have you considered this option, thoughts ?I do, (hold BRN in my retail super) and paid 62 cents each for them, at the time.
I also hold many more outside of super for which I now feel grateful.
It will be a blow to me if I have to sell them at anything less than purchase price because of a redomicile, but at the moment, that is the situation with my particular fund.
Other funds will have varying arrangements, but this is my situation.
Not looking for violins or sympathy, just stating a part of the way my reality will be affected.
And think many other's will likely be in the same boat.
This is just a side show to the main event, but I hope that the BOD are aware of these implications for some of us holder's and will factor us into their decision making.
I can’t see management batting an eye lid over loss of retail holder wealth unfortunately. The consolidation required, at this point, to even consider a move to the US you would have to think would destroy retail holders wealth. It would be a necessity to even make it possible to list on a US exchange. This one fact alone gives you an insight into the mindset of some of our current BOD
Like others have mentioned I think this Redomicile talk is a distraction tactic to shift focus from our obvious lack of commercial traction, so the freebies are approved and the hard questions are side stepped.
I’m all for a move to the US but in our current state we would first be diluted to oblivion and then because of our lack of revenue and huge operationslal spend crushed by aggressive shorting.
My opinion only…
