JDelekto
Regular
I do have a significant holding, but I think the top 20 have surpassed me. I'm unsure what the threshold is for the bottom 50, but they may have also outpaced me. My last BRN purchase was in April of this year, so come tax time next year, all of my holdings will be long. I have my holdings spread across three types of accounts: one for investment and two for retirement. I have not taken any shares off the table since I began accumulating shares.Sounds like you are a big holder JDelekto, I'm guessing between Top 50 and Top 20.
Thanks for your insights.
"I hope the company can live to see a level of profitability and buy back a good portion of those shares"
Just on the large amount of shares on issue, I don't see this as a problem and in fact, if this Company is headed where we want it to, a "share split" for liquidity reasons in the Future, is a distinct possibility.
There are between 750 and 800 million shares, in the Top 20 holders alone, as it stands now.
If BrainChip truly makes it's mark on the Global stage, supply will dry up quicker than a puddle of piss in Coober Pedy (an extremely hot dry area of South Australia, maybe a bit comparable to Death Valley in the US)..
This is when there is True Global demand for BRN shares and not just a few extra Yanks and lederhosen wearing folk.
I don't know if Australia has something similar to US tax-advantaged accounts that allow you to contribute only a small amount post-tax each year, and only if you fall within a specific adjusted gross income. With these accounts, the bet is that the amount of tax you pay now will be less than the amount of tax at the time distributions are taken. The best part of these accounts is that the money taken out during retirement doesn't count as income, and it is not taxed. That also includes capital gains and, it is not unheard of for people to make a windfall using that instrument.
I think the Mercedes announcement, while perceived as a good thing, was an injustice to the long-term holders. The real winners were the traders who took money off the table at its pinnacle, and those buying options when the price declined. I still think that Mercedes may be using Akida's technology. If I remember correctly, it was mentioned that Cerence was the company behind the voice technology in the concept vehicle that used BrainChip's tech. While BrainChip has been very tight-lipped about its customers, the radio silence Mercedes exhibits may have been due to the fallout of that slip during CES.
I also tend to think that people are now less enthusiastic about the hype and approach any new news that doesn't translate into rivers of revenue with a healthy dose of skepticism. While increasing revenue will pique the interest of those looking at the technicals, I think any announcement from a mainstream technology with a large footprint or association with a significant brand will also be enough to move the needle. At that point, I think demand will start driving the price up again.
It's a waiting game, but I believe BrainChip is in a better position now than five years ago.