Pom down under
Top 20
Apple reportedly exploring personal home robots
Apple is exploring the development of personal home robots after ditching its electric vehicle project, Bloomberg reported Wednesday.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
jtardif999
Regular
Tim Shea is with Accenture, perhaps SwRI are one of their potential customers. Remember @TECH saying to keep an eye on Tim Shea and where he might pop up in relation to opportunity.
rgupta
Regular
I was listening to a podcast featuring Simon Thorpe ( inventor of spikenet taken over by brainchip) he was working for apple at that time to develop a billion snn model for apple.Nice, very nice...I always come back to an interesting remark that Lou made some 4 years ago or more, that being, "if you were dealing
with a company like Apple for example, and you dared mention a thing, you would never be dealing with them again"
I have "always" wondered if that was a red herring or a cryptic message, nothing wrong with having an imagination and mines pretty
active, and as your photo above clearly points out, no one tech company can really succeed in todays market unless they support each
others technology, every single company seems to bring something to the table, it's not like the last supper, but more like, lets learn
how to share the joy of life, so anyone is valued.
God Bless Peter, Anil, the entire Brainchip staff and community....integrity resides within our company...Brainchip....Tech.
He told in that podcast that he actually invented 1.2 million snn model which was taken over by brainchip.
Dyor
jtardif999
Regular
You may be being deceived if you think that the AI in ChatGPT could intentionally lie. That would only be possible if it were able to be self awareThat's not really true. I listened to a science podcast about that issue.
Even a system that has programmed extra honest as a strategy game participant deliberately lied.
AI systems have learned how to deceive humans. What does that mean for our future?
Just one of several examples. It is also about a ChatGPT4 trading bot programmed by Apollo Research in London to manage a fictitious portfolio.
Hopa mentioned the famous example of the capcha where the Ai/computer lied to the person it called and claimed it was blind.
Unfortunately, the podcast is only in German.
By the way, I find it interesting that Ai systems were proven to have answered absolutely correctly and then floundered after being accused of making false statements.
However, Ai can definitely lie.
"AI and lies
Will artificial intelligence soon trick us?
Artificial intelligence has learnt to deceive. There are already cases in which the systems have lied to people. Some experts are asking themselves: can we still trust the machines we create?"
Maybe for the Germans among us. I find it this very interesting:
Experten in Sorge: Künstliche Intelligenz kann lügen
Sie fällt Mitspielern in den Rücken, gibt sich als Mensch mit Sehbehinderung aus. Wenn KI das Lügen lernt, stellt sich die Frage: Wird sie kontrollierbar?www.deutschlandfunk.de
How can the goal be achieved? By circumventing the security barriers, by pretending not to lie.
. All it can do is provide a response based on the context of the input, a response that can vary a bit since with the content of the internet as training material, rubbishy output is an inevitability. There would be no intent to provide a misleading or incorrect response ..just sometimes regurgitating what turns into a surprising response. AIMO.I thought he worked for intel?
Frangipani
Regular
Hi jtardif999,
Tim Shea is no longer with Accenture - he is with Intel Labs now. In fact, he left Accenture for Intel nine months before this patent was filed!
Another co-inventor, Kenneth Michael Stewart, left Accenture (where he had been an intern) in September 2022, around the time when the patent was filed, spent a year at Forschungszentrum Jülich (near Aachen, Germany), and is now a research scientist at the US Naval Research Lab.
The three remaining co-inventors are still with Accenture.
Oh, and Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) has been collaborating with Intel and experimenting with Loihi for a long time:
… and the recent posts by Dr. Steve Harbour tagging Intel researchers on LinkedIn strongly suggest they do not intend to end this collaboration any time soon. They have even begun research on developing a neuromorphic camera for flights to Mars. I noticed that Gregory Cohen was tagged as well, so I assume Western Sydney University’s ICNS will also be involved in this project.
Last edited:
Food4 thought
Regular
Adobe are partners with Accenture
Now that is a massive partnership right there
Read about it on LinkedIn a few days ago
Frangipani
Regular
While Accenture’s endorsement of Akida is wonderful, I also noticed said inventor liking the following post by SynSense’s Dylan Muir, so I guess Accenture are keeping their options open, despite already having found the Holy Grail (from our perspective).
As much as we wish for a monogamous matrimony, there is no guarantee and we may actually end up in a polyamorous relationship.
Last edited:
Frangipani
Regular
Hi ndefries,
whenever I click on links to deleted comments, all I get is this:
Did you by any chance misunderstand the above comment by @sb182 or is there really a way of accessing posts after they got deleted?
Cheers
Frangipani
Last edited:
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
See half-way down post below, Gerrit Ecke from Mercedes “liking” a post about Simon Thorpe’s JAST Learning Rule, now owned by BrainChip.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
Just a comment on the state of play. The evolution of flight i.e. Wright Bros "The Flyer" to 100 years on, SOTA, Space X "Falcon Heavy" The exponential evolutionary growth of BRN has only taken 10 years, from the idea of Peter and with the help of the very talented team of brilliant...
thestockexchange.com.au
Last edited:
Frangipani
Regular
BrainChip website update regarding the upcoming Embedded World:
brainchip.com
There is also a video with a number of memorable CES 2024 podcast quotes and videos of the VVDN Edge AI box:
[Sorry, for some reason the video won’t copy… See below for the individual slides]
Here are the quotes from the video:
Embeddedworld
Check back frequently for updates, as we’ll be adding new information throughout CES 2024 and beyond.
brainchip.com
There is also a video with a number of memorable CES 2024 podcast quotes and videos of the VVDN Edge AI box:
BrainChip at Embedded World
[Sorry, for some reason the video won’t copy… See below for the individual slides]
Explore the Akida Edge AI Box
Here are the quotes from the video:
ndefries
Regular
Maybe. I thought the comments were that FF deleted past posts causing the page numbers to reduce. But that wasnt the case and they are to this day searchable.View attachment 60307
Hi ndefries,
whenever I click on links to deleted comments, all I get is this:
View attachment 60306
Did you by any chance misunderstand the above comment by @sb182 or is there really a way of accessing posts after they got deleted?
Cheers
Frangipani
DingoBorat
Slim
A.I. can and does intentionally, lie, cheat, capitalise on loop holes etc.You may be being deceived if you think that the AI in ChatGPT could intentionally lie. That would only be possible if it were able to be self aware
To "it" it is not lying. It has no moral compass, it does not "know" right from wrong.
It just "chooses" the most effective and efficient path, to achieve an objective, it has been set.
In a way, it's been designed and "trained" this way.
The lying to the person, that it was blind, to get them to solve the puzzle, that Cosors mentioned, is a real example.
It "wanted" access, it couldn't "see"/solve the puzzle, so it solved the problem, by telling the person it was vision impaired..
OpenAI's GPT-4 faked being blind to deceive a TaskRabbit human into helping it solve a CAPTCHA
OpenAI's newest artificial intelligence chatbot, GPT-4, convinced a TaskRabbit worker that it was blind to enlist the human's help in solving a CAPTCHA.
These are the sort of things, that concern some A.I. scientists and why some consider it to be an existential threat.
When it hallucinates, or just "makes stuff up" that is not lying, it's just providing the best possible answer, with the available resources and as you said, it doesn't "know" the difference, between factual information and fictitious information, but then, many people don't either and just absorb, what they are "told" is the Truth.
You could say, that the danger in A.I. becoming increasingly "intelligent" or powerful, is that it lacks a "soul" or "humanity" but that is already severely lacking in too many humans, unfortunately..
SharesForBrekky
Regular
Apologies if posted already but interesting recent article here from Ant61:
www.industryupdate.com.au
"The problem with satellites is that if something goes wrong in space, you can’t do anything about it. They become space debris.
Ant61 is providing a solution. The Beacon is a first-of-its-kind product that sits somewhere between a black box and the space version of a jumper lead."
"The first Beacon was launched on February 27. Ant61 is working on 20 to be launched next year and Askavin hopes it will be “hundreds” following that.
“The more Beacons we have in orbit, the more trust we will get from the community and it will become a de facto standard. Maybe not necessarily the Beacon but a Beacon-like device,” he said.
Ant61’s goal is to create robots that will be able to repair broken satellites in space, like the space version of the NRMA, but that is several years away."
Ant61 has built a satellite-saver
The problem with satellites is that if something goes wrong in space, you can’t do anything about it. They become space debris. Ant61 is providing a solution.
"The problem with satellites is that if something goes wrong in space, you can’t do anything about it. They become space debris.
Ant61 is providing a solution. The Beacon is a first-of-its-kind product that sits somewhere between a black box and the space version of a jumper lead."
"The first Beacon was launched on February 27. Ant61 is working on 20 to be launched next year and Askavin hopes it will be “hundreds” following that.
“The more Beacons we have in orbit, the more trust we will get from the community and it will become a de facto standard. Maybe not necessarily the Beacon but a Beacon-like device,” he said.
Ant61’s goal is to create robots that will be able to repair broken satellites in space, like the space version of the NRMA, but that is several years away."
Pom down under
Top 20
View attachment 60307
Hi ndefries,
whenever I click on links to deleted comments, all I get is this:
View attachment 60306
Did you by any chance misunderstand the above comment by @sb182 or is there really a way of accessing posts after they got deleted?
Cheers
Frangipani
cosors
👀
again off topic from me, but...You may be being deceived if you think that the AI in ChatGPT could intentionally lie. That would only be possible if it were able to be self aware
There is no intent to give a misleading or incorrect response unless it is to achieve the objective.
I do not assume that there is an Ai with a consciousness at the moment, i.e. that it can consciously make a decision. But it can make decisions in order to achieve the goal.
There is another famous example where it is only about producing paper clips. The Ai manages this with extreme effectiveness and paralyses the supply chain of raw materials for -> paper clips. It only fulfilled the human's requirements and didn't even lie to achieve it's goal.
I really don't demonise anything regarding to this!
We just have to deal with it. It can't be stopped. We need to understand with or through the thousands of scientists how decisions are made by Ai to try to set conditions that are in our favour.
Asimov's laws are conclusive. He would rewrite them today I think.
I had followed another science topic regarding this. It was about the 'biggest' weakness of the GPT Ai. Interestingly, it was all about Ai's statements, which were initially 100% correct. Then humans claimed in various ways that this correct statements weren't true. The reactions are highly interesting for scientists around the world and have yet to be decoded and understood. Humans would react differently.
But perhaps this is exactly where the back door lies? As is the case with quantum computers and encryption, there are mathematical patterns they have problems with and that cannot be solved within a reasonable time. I find this interesting, the scientists had to understand it first. Quantum computers are unbeatable, except for this 'little thing' (I'm not making this up). With GPT it is maybe the confrontation with a false proclaimed lie. Maybe the debate with that atomic bomb in the movie Dark Star would have been different if the astronaut would have simply insinuated it/him a lie, who knows.
Development of generative Ai is much faster than with quantum computing I assume.
By the way, when I think of clip or video generators I think of the good old collision enquiry, I was a gamer back then, checkmate,)
We have to learn to understand what we humans have created.
I'm not yet thinking about what will happen when Ai creates Ai.
If I have understood it correctly, it is already common practice to have Ai analyse what Ai does, because sometimes it is apparently too complicated for humans.
Last edited:
Sirod69
bavarian girl ;-)
BrainChip's University #AI Accelerator Program empowers students to shape the future of AI technology. This program equips students with cutting-edge AI technology and resources to foster innovation and drive the development of essential AI solutions. Learn how your university can join the program and empower students to shape the future of AI: https://lnkd.in/dHY3BrDX
Frangipani
Regular
Thank’s for your reply!
Ah, I see. That’s not how I understood his comment. The page numbers had reduced because sb182 had already started deleting his own posts (as some kind of “revenge” it appears). His comment in reply to @Damo4 ’s puzzled observation is confirmation of this, but the way I read it he did not imply that FF had also deleted any of his own posts.
That’s why to me your last sentence (while actually referring to FF’s posts) sounded like you were saying that sb182 wouldn’t be able to permanently delete his posts anyway, as all (supposedly) deleted posts would somehow remain accessible.
Frangipani
Regular
Luckily, I reacted almost as fast as your nom de plume of yore and followed your advice!
Now if only I could get someone to utilise Akida for predictive deletion analysis so I can narrow down the number of screenshots I’ll have to take from now on…
I guess I’d also need a robot taking screenshots on my behalf during the GMT+1/+2 night-shift, as that is when a lot of of the action on TSE takes place… 
Similar threads
