Totally Agree Jesse as you mentioned I believe Brn's weakest point is communication, with broader Asx market. We all know retail share holder has been digging to get where is BRN Akida has been or will be used. We get more information here then by BRN it self. It will be my sixth years of Holding BRN and feels like I dont know nothing about it and how much engagement we have and where are we in terms of commercial engagement.But…but….but I demand it happen now and they announce everything right now and break all the NDA’s and run the risk of losing the commercial relationship and I demand more from Antonio who has licensed 100’s of licenses with ARM, the largest supplier of IP in the world, what would he know?
And Sean Hehir who was VP of Strategic Alliances, looking after Microsoft, Cisco, AMD, Intel. What would he know about building ecosystems and working with global tier one companies and managing relationships and contracts?
& Chris stevens who has worked for Syntiant and sold edge ai devices, what would he know?
And Nanden who was in change of the adoption of “Hey Alexa” at a trillion US$ company Amazon and worked for ARM for 16 years as Vice President and GM of Immersive Experience & Augmented Reality and wearable devices, what would he know?
Duy-Loan Le, what would she know? She only used to work for Texas Instruments for 35 years.
I demand they go about sales and marketing how I say they should, to make me feel better in the short term, not how they think what works and I demand they don’t earn the money they do and work for peanuts despite them being able to get a job elsewhere for double the money
What did Chris Stevens say when he joined Brainchip? He said-
“I have tracked BrainChip’s progress closely, as I’ve been selling into the same edge AI market. I am thrilled to take this sales leadership role with confidence as AkidaTM is uniquely superior and positioned to be the de facto standard for edge AI semiconductor IP”, said Stevens. “With use-case, market, and customer targeting, I’m certain I will contribute to further ecosystem penetration and accelerated sales”.
Nanden when he joined, leaving Amazon valued at $1 trillion US, said-
“I am excited to join BrainChip. Our unique approach to performant and efficient edge AI at scale is a great enabler for an industry that is looking for innovative and transformative solutions” said Nayampally. “It is a great opportunity to not only advance product intelligence at the sensor and the edge but unleash the full power of AI. BrainChip is positioned to create that positive change and I’m thrilled to be a part of making that happen.”
Duy-Loan when joining Brainchip from Texas Instruments, valued at $250 billion AUS said-
“We are at a point of transition in the semiconductor industry as edge computing has pushed for new, more efficient techniques and hardware,” said Duy-Loan Le. “BrainChip has a differentiated and commercially viable IP product that can transform edge computing at-large. I’m excited about and committed to my role as a board director.
I fully trust the company’s approach to building this company into the behemoth it will be.
My only wish is they learn to communicate with Aus shareholders a bit better but other than that, I am fully supportive of how it is all happening.
Just take a look at the other neuromorphic companies and who they’ve got working for them, how many partners they have, and compare them to Brainchip.
We are absolutely uniquely positioned to play a massive part in the edge ai space.
Would it be inside trading if any of the staff brought shares, with all the N.D.A.Totally Agree Jesse as you mentioned I believe Brn's weakest point is communication, with broader Asx market. We all know retail share holder has been digging to get where is BRN Akida has been or will be used. We get more information here then by BRN it self. It will be my sixth years of Holding BRN and feels like I dont know nothing about it and how much engagement we have and where are we in terms of commercial engagement.
And also if the greatest bairn has joined BRN Team believing in the tech that is one of a kind and disruptive. None of board has bought a share that we know of.
I assume the problems are multifold and beyond someone's controlTotally Agree Jesse as you mentioned I believe Brn's weakest point is communication, with broader Asx market. We all know retail share holder has been digging to get where is BRN Akida has been or will be used. We get more information here then by BRN it self. It will be my sixth years of Holding BRN and feels like I dont know nothing about it and how much engagement we have and where are we in terms of commercial engagement.
And also if the greatest bairn has joined BRN Team believing in the tech that is one of a kind and disruptive. None of board has bought a share that we know of.
Just like Drake's ship!i did like Dodgyknees butt in this instance
I'm more excited about the shoes to be honest.
I hope this saves someone a few dollars. Because posts as solid and as informative as Chapman's always are reassuring and comforting. Below though is my experience through investing and what has saved me alot of losses with the lessons applied..But…but….but I demand it happen now and they announce everything right now and break all the NDA’s and run the risk of losing the commercial relationship and I demand more from Antonio who has licensed 100’s of licenses with ARM, the largest supplier of IP in the world, what would he know?
And Sean Hehir who was VP of Strategic Alliances, looking after Microsoft, Cisco, AMD, Intel. What would he know about building ecosystems and working with global tier one companies and managing relationships and contracts?
& Chris stevens who has worked for Syntiant and sold edge ai devices, what would he know?
And Nanden who was in change of the adoption of “Hey Alexa” at a trillion US$ company Amazon and worked for ARM for 16 years as Vice President and GM of Immersive Experience & Augmented Reality and wearable devices, what would he know?
Duy-Loan Le, what would she know? She only used to work for Texas Instruments for 35 years.
I demand they go about sales and marketing how I say they should, to make me feel better in the short term, not how they think what works and I demand they don’t earn the money they do and work for peanuts despite them being able to get a job elsewhere for double the money
What did Chris Stevens say when he joined Brainchip? He said-
“I have tracked BrainChip’s progress closely, as I’ve been selling into the same edge AI market. I am thrilled to take this sales leadership role with confidence as AkidaTM is uniquely superior and positioned to be the de facto standard for edge AI semiconductor IP”, said Stevens. “With use-case, market, and customer targeting, I’m certain I will contribute to further ecosystem penetration and accelerated sales”.
Nanden when he joined, leaving Amazon valued at $1 trillion US, said-
“I am excited to join BrainChip. Our unique approach to performant and efficient edge AI at scale is a great enabler for an industry that is looking for innovative and transformative solutions” said Nayampally. “It is a great opportunity to not only advance product intelligence at the sensor and the edge but unleash the full power of AI. BrainChip is positioned to create that positive change and I’m thrilled to be a part of making that happen.”
Duy-Loan when joining Brainchip from Texas Instruments, valued at $250 billion AUS said-
“We are at a point of transition in the semiconductor industry as edge computing has pushed for new, more efficient techniques and hardware,” said Duy-Loan Le. “BrainChip has a differentiated and commercially viable IP product that can transform edge computing at-large. I’m excited about and committed to my role as a board director.
I fully trust the company’s approach to building this company into the behemoth it will be.
My only wish is they learn to communicate with Aus shareholders a bit better but other than that, I am fully supportive of how it is all happening.
Just take a look at the other neuromorphic companies and who they’ve got working for them, how many partners they have, and compare them to Brainchip.
We are absolutely uniquely positioned to play a massive part in the edge ai space.
Hi Schnitzel Mate.I hope this saves someone a few dollars. Because posts as solid and as informative as Chapman's always are reassuring and comforting. Below though is my experience through investing and what has saved me alot of losses with the lessons applied..
I found in the past that when an investment is underperforming in value, I always tried to search for more information to reassure myself I was on the right track, then to be able to justify the narrative and research that everything is ok.
In essence what I discovered was that no matter how much sleuthing or digging, or researching I did, no matter how much I read market research and information on a company's progress through social media, company websites, company announcements etc etc, it didn't really make any difference to the bottom line, which was the dwindling value of my hard-earned income.
I found a better way- if my investment is down more than 10%, my entry was incorrect, the market is off, or the company invested in isn't yet as good as what my research suggests. So I sold, protected my capital, and at the same period of time started learning how to study the characteristics of strongly performing companies and the metrics of the only thing that matters- the supply and demand in the buying or selling of a stock.
Once there was a decent body of evidence that a company was attracting demand in its buying of shares, then and then only would I take more interest in digging into the company's financials and nuts and bolts of the business.
A company like BRN has a relatively large amount of shares on issue which in turn takes a longer period of time to accumulate positions before the tide will turn in favour of an appreciating share price. Case in point the past few decent runs BRN has had, took atleast 12-18 months of basing and buying to wear out the sellers and allow price to rise.
So with that all in mind whenever I start digging to find more information on why an investment isn't working within a close period of buying, it reminds me that there's a signal I probably need to sell and reassess things.. And the bank account will thank me for it in the long run..
I've been there and there's no solace for those that are sitting on big losses and I feel for you, but if you learn this tough lesson you might have the opportunity of longevity in markets and a positive experience in the long run.
Cheers.. And of course I hope we start seeing some more positive price action for BRN, because I'll be an as enthusiastic a shareholder as ever.
Interesting that RT would like the below found by @IloveLamp , and then release a PR statement that includes such specific wording about battery powered (wearables) and fan-less devices.
https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/news/worlds-smallest-particulate-matter-sensor-bmv080.html
So you advocate selling now just when the company is likely on the cusp of commercial success?I hope this saves someone a few dollars. Because posts as solid and as informative as Chapman's always are reassuring and comforting. Below though is my experience through investing and what has saved me alot of losses with the lessons applied..
I found in the past that when an investment is underperforming in value, I always tried to search for more information to reassure myself I was on the right track, then to be able to justify the narrative and research that everything is ok.
In essence what I discovered was that no matter how much sleuthing or digging, or researching I did, no matter how much I read market research and information on a company's progress through social media, company websites, company announcements etc etc, it didn't really make any difference to the bottom line, which was the dwindling value of my hard-earned income.
I found a better way- if my investment is down more than 10%, my entry was incorrect, the market is off, or the company invested in isn't yet as good as what my research suggests. So I sold, protected my capital, and at the same period of time started learning how to study the characteristics of strongly performing companies and the metrics of the only thing that matters- the supply and demand in the buying or selling of a stock.
Once there was a decent body of evidence that a company was attracting demand in its buying of shares, then and then only would I take more interest in digging into the company's financials and nuts and bolts of the business.
A company like BRN has a relatively large amount of shares on issue which in turn takes a longer period of time to accumulate positions before the tide will turn in favour of an appreciating share price. Case in point the past few decent runs BRN has had, took atleast 12-18 months of basing and buying to wear out the sellers and allow price to rise.
So with that all in mind whenever I start digging to find more information on why an investment isn't working within a close period of buying, it reminds me that there's a signal I probably need to sell and reassess things.. And the bank account will thank me for it in the long run..
I've been there and there's no solace for those that are sitting on big losses and I feel for you, but if you learn this tough lesson you might have the opportunity of longevity in markets and a positive experience in the long run.
Cheers.. And of course I hope we start seeing some more positive price action for BRN, because I'll be an as enthusiastic a shareholder as ever.
That looks huge !!Good morning/afternoon from Germany
in "The Handelsblatt" today another article about Mercedes, Qualcomm and Nvidia:
"Qualcomm to oust Nvidia from Mercedes cockpit
In the future, the carmaker will source the chips for the infotainment of the new E-Class from Qualcomm. Insiders expect the Stuttgart-based company to further distance itself from Nvidia.
Munich Setback for the world's most valuable chip company: Nvidia has lost a prestigious contract with carmaker Mercedes. For the next generation of the E-Class, rival Qualcomm will supply the chips for the infotainment. "Our Snapdragon solution is becoming the preferred platform for the digital cockpit," Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon told Handelsblatt of the new partnership on the sidelines of the IAA auto show in Munich.
For Mercedes, this should end its heavy dependence on U.S. chip company Nvidia. The Stuttgart-based automaker currently relies on chips and software from the Qualcomm competitor for both driver assistance systems and infotainment.
The contracts are still a topic of discussion in the automotive industry today: Mercedes has agreed a so-called "revenue sharing" with Nvidia for the driver assistance systems. This means that Nvidia will share in the revenue that Mercedes generates from the sale of driver assistance systems. This agreement has caused a lot of internal disgruntlement because Nvidia will receive a 50 percent share of the revenues."
translation with deepl.com
Regards
Cassip
Good morning/afternoon from Germany
in "The Handelsblatt" today another article about Mercedes, Qualcomm and Nvidia:
"Qualcomm to oust Nvidia from Mercedes cockpit
In the future, the carmaker will source the chips for the infotainment of the new E-Class from Qualcomm. Insiders expect the Stuttgart-based company to further distance itself from Nvidia.
Munich Setback for the world's most valuable chip company: Nvidia has lost a prestigious contract with carmaker Mercedes. For the next generation of the E-Class, rival Qualcomm will supply the chips for the infotainment. "Our Snapdragon solution is becoming the preferred platform for the digital cockpit," Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon told Handelsblatt of the new partnership on the sidelines of the IAA auto show in Munich.
For Mercedes, this should end its heavy dependence on U.S. chip company Nvidia. The Stuttgart-based automaker currently relies on chips and software from the Qualcomm competitor for both driver assistance systems and infotainment.
The contracts are still a topic of discussion in the automotive industry today: Mercedes has agreed a so-called "revenue sharing" with Nvidia for the driver assistance systems. This means that Nvidia will share in the revenue that Mercedes generates from the sale of driver assistance systems. This agreement has caused a lot of internal disgruntlement because Nvidia will receive a 50 percent share of the revenues."
translation with deepl.com
Regards
Cassip