robsmark
Regular
0.275?My spidey senses are tingling this morning so I'm going to strike while the iron's hot: FF may have been a year early but I'm calling his $2.75 SP by this Christmas.
NOT...... INVESTMENT...... ADVICE![]()
0.275?My spidey senses are tingling this morning so I'm going to strike while the iron's hot: FF may have been a year early but I'm calling his $2.75 SP by this Christmas.
NOT...... INVESTMENT...... ADVICE![]()
Judging by the drop I take it that you topped up yesterday?0.275?
From the report: 'The reduction in revenues to $115,606 from $4,831,081 in the same period a year agoDidn’t it say end of the quarter and a couple of media articles (not from BRN) say end of August?
"EXPECTED RELEASE"From the report: 'The reduction in revenues to $115,606 from $4,831,081 in the same period a year ago
reflects the volatility of revenues in the early years of commercialisation, noting that several
active customers elected to defer their evaluation of BrainChip’s technology until after the
expected release of Akida 2.0 in August 2023'.
Considering this was released only a few days ago you'd expect that the timeline is pretty accurate.
Thanks for pointing that out. I’d be amazed if BRN did 2 good announcements in one week ( 1500 & 2.0).From the report: 'The reduction in revenues to $115,606 from $4,831,081 in the same period a year ago
reflects the volatility of revenues in the early years of commercialisation, noting that several
active customers elected to defer their evaluation of BrainChip’s technology until after the
expected release of Akida 2.0 in August 2023'.
Considering this was released only a few days ago you'd expect that the timeline is pretty accurate.
Yeah true Rise, but why would you 'over promise and under deliver' on something as simple as this. If there's any doubt just say by the end of the quarter. They know shareholder (and shorters) are hanging on every word."EXPECTED RELEASE"
I don't know mate, nothing surprises me anymoreYeah true Rise, but why would you 'over promise and under deliver' on something as simple as this. If there's any doubt just say by the end of the quarter. They know shareholder (and shorters) are hanging on every word.
Also that "expected" in release is a insurance policy so people can't legitimately complain if it's not delivered by the expected time .Yeah true Rise, but why would you 'over promise and under deliver' on something as simple as this. If there's any doubt just say by the end of the quarter. They know shareholder (and shorters) are hanging on every word.
Hi Foxdog, does this evaluation mean the active customers will be testing it again as I thought they were the ones who provided feedback on it's design in first place. Let's say it is released tomorrow morning then I would consider it shouldn't take very long to evaluate if it is working silicon. We might have 1 announcement tomorrow regarding Gen2 release and another related to an active customer or a material contract. Fingers crossedFrom the report: 'The reduction in revenues to $115,606 from $4,831,081 in the same period a year ago
reflects the volatility of revenues in the early years of commercialisation, noting that several
active customers elected to defer their evaluation of BrainChip’s technology until after the
expected release of Akida 2.0 in August 2023'.
Considering this was released only a few days ago you'd expect that the timeline is pretty accurate.
Where is Brainchip’s link to this ?View attachment 43261![]()
Cloud and ML leadership with Neoverse V2
We detail the new features and capabilities available on the Arm Neoverse V2 Platform and show how it delivers leadership performance on cloud, HPC and AI/ML workloads.community.arm.com
You know that it's impossible. What do you think the share price would be in this scenario?
If I had a crystal ball telling me in scenario x with or without involvement of party y even though they exist, share price z would eventuate, you wouldn't see me posting on any stock forum ever again.
Once again, shorters are not mainly responsible, like you said. It's the company who hasn't made any relevant revenue of its product, which naturally attracts people/ institutions that make money of bad performing shortin
Shorters don’t just attack underperforming companies. They attack start ups and companies that are trying to grow quickly with the aid of capital raising. If shorters can see a company will need to go to the market for money to grow they will hammer the price down a month before and buy in the capital raising and make serious dollars. You might want to paint shorting as good practice but in reality they are no different than the mafia. They hold companies to ransom and choice who survive and whom don’t. There should be an independent inquiry into shorters and the harm it does to companies and investors.You know that it's impossible. What do you think the share price would be in this scenario?
If I had a crystal ball telling me in scenario x with or without involvement of party y even though they exist, share price z would eventuate, you wouldn't see me posting on any stock forum ever again.
Once again, shorters are not mainly responsible, like you said. It's the company who hasn't made any relevant revenue of its product, which naturally attracts people/ institutions that make money of bad performing companies.
I don't recall seeing this but then again not paying too close attention either.
Starts at 14 mins 43 seconds
Yep they are bloody bad lot, they have an unfair advantage being able to trade many times for next to nothing in the blink of an eye. A protected breed making serious money. My hope is that they don’t want to kill the goose laying the golden eggs , expect them to ease off soon and ride with us on the way up and when it suits them start again. Our turn will come, have a plan .Shorters don’t just attack underperforming companies. They attack start ups and companies that are trying to grow quickly with the aid of capital raising. If shorters can see a company will need to go to the market for money to grow they will hammer the price down a month before and buy in the capital raising and make serious dollars. You might want to paint shorting as good practice but in reality they are no different than the mafia. They hold companies to ransom and choice who survive and whom don’t. There should be an independent inquiry into shorters and the harm it does to companies and investors.
"Looking forward to hearing more from #EdgeAI innovation at the #GTS2023"
Late addition:
Learning![]()
So our media team have got it wrong on 2 platforms this morning.![]()
Sign Up | LinkedIn
500 million+ members | Manage your professional identity. Build and engage with your professional network. Access knowledge, insights and opportunities.www.linkedin.com
View attachment 43306
You mean this oneHi @Learning,
It's interesting that the platinum partners are Cadence, Siemens and Synopsy.
Remember the BrainChip job ad for an IP Verification Engineer in Hyderabad before it was taken down which also mentioned Cadence, Siemens and Synopsys. Probably just some random and irrelevant co-incidence.
In addition to this there's also this to consider...
View attachment 43305