Space Cadet
Regular
Thanks Bravo, great explanationHi Space Cadet,
I’m pretty sure one of our BOD said some time ago that safety certification is handled by the OEM.
From what I’ve read, it works something like this - the OEM (Mercedes in this case), owns the vehicle-level L3/L4 feature and the full ISO 26262 / SOTIF (ISO 21448) / ISO/SAE 21434 safety case. In short, Mercedes are the certifying party.
Mercedes can shift portions of the responsibility to a supplier (i.e Athos) if they ship the mSoC/ECU. In that case, Athos would be responsible for the ECU-level safety case (redundancy, voting, diagnostics) and for providing SEooC documentation back to Mercedes.
BrainChip’s role is different. We provide the IP plus the safety collateral (safety manual, failure-mode/diagnostics data, etc.) so our tech can be used inside the OEM’s vehicle/system-level certification.
From what I understand, for system certification you need the whole kit and caboodle - sensors + perception + planning + actuation + ISO 26262/SOTIF + redundancy. By that standard, no single accelerator (GPU/NPU/CPU/neuromorphic) “achieves L3/L4” on its own. Akida isn’t meant to be the whole ADAS computer; it’s a low-power, event-driven component that fits inside an L3/L4 ECU.
Athos Silicon’s mSoC is meant to give an OEM the building blocks to construct that ISO 26262/SOTIF case around their autonomous driving stack. Their pitch is that their solution is a safety envelope (redundancy + voting + diagnostics + isolation + timing discipline) that makes it easier for OEMs to build an L3/L4 system. It provides the critical safety architecture into which the rest of the stack can be integrated. That envelope is meant to be vendor-agnostic and therefore I suppose it can host NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Arm NPUs, Intel, BrainChip's Akida, etc.
I assume Piednoel said "Akida does not pass minimum requirements for a Level 3 or level 4" to promote his Athos’s mSoC solution, rather than provide free airtime to Akida. The idea being that chips don’t meet L3/L4 alone, but can inside Athos’s safety architecture.
Markus May’s “not on its own” reply reinforces that idea IMO.
These are my opinions only. Please DYOR.
SC