Forget quantum — neuromorphic AI could be the real disruptor, reshaping everything from medicine to warfare while cutting energy use dramatically.
www.cio.com
by
Daniel Hoffman
Contributor
Neuromorphic computing and the future of edge AI
Opinion
Sep 8, 202510 mins
Artificial IntelligenceNeural NetworksQuantum Computing
Forget quantum — neuromorphic AI could be the real disruptor, reshaping everything from medicine to warfare while cutting energy use dramatically.
Credit: MetamorWorks / Getty Images
By now, most IT professionals are well aware of the current CPU/GPU hardware architecture used for AI and the associated problems with power, cooling and connectivity. While these architectures have enabled breakthrough AI capabilities, they also face serious physical and operational constraints:
- Power consumption. A single data-center-grade GPU can draw 300–700 watts, and large training runs often require thousands of them operating in parallel.
- Cooling requirements. A high power draw results in significant thermal output, necessitating extensive liquid or air cooling systems, which add cost and complexity.
- Bandwidth bottlenecks. Moving massive datasets between memory, storage and compute units strains interconnects, introducing delays and consuming more energy.
- Latency. Even with high-speed networking, inference requests routed to cloud-based GPU clusters face network latency — problematic for time-critical applications such as robotics, autonomous vehicles or cybersecurity defense.
These constraints are pushing researchers and industry toward alternative computing architectures that can deliver high performance with drastically lower energy and infrastructure demands.
Recently, many of my peers have been speculating about the effect quantum computing (QC) will have on AI, as if that will be the next big catalyst for AI to dominate everything. But due tov
quantum’s major hurdles — qubit instability, error correction overhead and the need for cryogenic cooling — they are costly and impractical for the continuous, large-scale workloads that drive modern AI.
While QC captures the mainstream headlines, neuromorphic computing has positioned itself as a force in the next era of AI. While conventional AI relies heavily on GPU/TPU-based architectures, neuromorphic systems mimic the parallel and event-driven nature of the human brain. The recently announced
Darwin Monkey 3 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences signals a new stage in this race. With claims of outperforming traditional supercomputers in edge and energy‑constrained environments, the DM3 invites analysis of its potential impact.
Life imitates art
In “Terminator 2: Judgment Day,” the T-800 explains that his brain runs on a “neural-net processor, a learning computer,” a piece of Hollywood sci-fi tech that seemed designed to make cyborgs sound more menacing. And against all reason, scientists have gone ahead and built it. Neuromorphic chips now mimic the very thing the scriptwriters imagined: brain-like processors that learn and adapt in real time. No, they’re not striding around in leather jackets with shotguns, but they are bringing artificial intelligence to the edge, disconnected and learning. What was once a cinematic plot device has quietly become a laboratory reality, proving that sometimes life really does imitate the movies.
Comparative analysis: CPU/GPU vs. neuromorphic systems
To appreciate the significance of neuromorphic breakthroughs, it is important to compare them directly with the dominant compute platforms of today, CPUs and GPUs.
- CPUs excel at general-purpose computing with strong single-threaded performance and broad software ecosystems. However, they struggle with massively parallel AI workloads and are power‑hungry at scale.
- GPUs/TPUs have become the backbone of modern AI training and inference, offering massive parallelism and mature frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch. Yet they are highly energy‑intensive, require cooling and infrastructure, and are less suitable for size, weight and power (SWaP)-constrained environments such as IoT or edge devices.
- Neuromorphic systems, in contrast, are designed around event-driven, spike-based architectures. They compute only when stimuli occur, yielding extraordinary energy efficiency and low-latency processing. This makes them highly suitable for real-time edge applications, adaptive control and on-device intelligence. However, neuromorphic platforms face limitations in tooling, developer familiarity and ecosystem maturity.
AI on the edge
Neuromorphic hardware has shown promise in edge environments where power efficiency, latency and adaptability matter most. From wearable medical devices to battlefield robotics, systems that can “think locally” without requiring constant cloud connectivity offer clear advantages.
Recent surveys in neuromorphic computing demonstrate applications spanning real‑time sensory processing, robotics and adaptive control.
Healthcare and R&D bridge
Healthcare is a leading beneficiary of neuromorphic breakthroughs. Neuromorphic systems are being studied for diagnostics, prosthetics and personalized medicine. A recent review highlights how
neuromorphic computing is contributing to diagnostic imaging, brain-computer interfaces and adaptive neuroprosthetics, bridging edge diagnosis with frontier R&D. For example, neuromorphic neuroprosthetics have shown promise in restoring sensory feedback to amputees, while low‑power neuromorphic imaging chips are enabling continuous patient monitoring.
At the same time,
Steve Furber and others stress that real‑time event‑driven sensors — such as event‑based vision systems — are where neuromorphic excels today. These systems only compute when stimuli occur, making them particularly valuable in healthcare wearables and medical imaging, where sparse, efficient data capture is critical.
Industrial control systems (ICS)
Industrial systems demand ultra‑low‑latency and robust decision‑making under uncertainty. Neuromorphic computing offers clear advantages in closed‑loop control, process optimization and anomaly detection. A paper published recently in Nature Communications demonstrates how
spiking neural networks can handle nonlinear process control and adapt to disturbances in real time. This aligns with prior work on neuromorphic resilience in ICS, particularly in power grids, oil & gas and manufacturing, where continuous adaptation is critical.
CIO Smart Answers
Learn more
Explore related questions
Why this matters in simple terms: Closed‑loop control is like a thermostat constantly adjusting heating to keep a room comfortable — neuromorphic chips allow ICS to make those adjustments instantly and efficiently. Process optimization is similar to cruise control in a car, keeping things running smoothly while using less fuel or energy. Anomaly detection works like a smoke detector, spotting early signs of trouble before they escalate. In industries where downtime costs millions, or where failures can be dangerous, these capabilities translate directly into safer, cheaper and more reliable operations.
Aircraft and shipping
Applications in aerospace and maritime domains leverage neuromorphic systems’ ability to process complex sensory streams while remaining power efficient. In aviation, neuromorphic processors can aid in autonomous navigation, fault detection and cockpit assistance. In shipping, neuromorphic computing supports sensor fusion and real‑time anomaly detection in harsh, bandwidth‑limited environments.
Logistics
Beyond ICS and transportation, logistics presents a compelling use case for neuromorphic computing. A
2025 review of supply chain resilienceemphasizes dynamic modeling through hybrid complex‑network and agent‑based approaches. Neuromorphic architectures mirror this hybrid paradigm, enabling parallel simulations, disruption response and adaptive re‑routing in real time. Practical applications include warehouse robotics, just‑in‑time inventory management and intermodal transport optimization. By integrating neuromorphic systems, logistics chains could achieve a higher degree of resilience, limiting ripple effects during global disruptions.
Security and SOC applications
Another promising area is cybersecurity and Security Operations Centers (SOCs). Spiking neural networks (SNNs) process data in an event‑driven fashion, making them ideal for real‑time anomaly detection with minimal energy overhead. Their selective processing also enhances privacy by limiting unnecessary data exposure, a key advantage in handling sensitive information. Emerging work on
spiking neural P systems shows effectiveness in malware detection, phishing identification and spam filtering with fewer training cycles than conventional deep learning systems. Early findings also suggest that
SNNs may be more resilient to adversarial attacks due to their spike‑based encoding and nonlinear temporal dynamics.
More recently, a US government‑backed study demonstrated that neuromorphic platforms such as BrainChip’s Akida 1000 and Intel’s Loihi 2 can achieve up to 98.4% accuracy in multiclass attack detection, matching full‑precision GPUs while consuming far less power. These chips were tested across nine network traffic types, including multiple attack categories and benign traffic, showing their suitability for deployment in aircraft, UAVs and edge gateways where size, weight, power and cost (SWaP‑C) constraints are critical. This represents
a leap over earlier prototypes (~93.7% accuracy), aided by improved tooling like Intel’s Lava framework. Combined with advances in semi‑supervised and continual learning, neuromorphic SOC solutions are now capable of adapting to evolving threats while minimizing catastrophic forgetting.
Equally important, neuromorphic AI is directly tackling the SWaP problem that prevents conventional AI from running effectively at the edge. In 2022, more than 112 million IoT devices were compromised, and IoT malware surged by 400% the following year. Neuromorphic processors, such as Akida 1000, address these challenges by delivering on‑device, event‑driven anomaly detection without heavy infrastructure requirements. This positions neuromorphic SOC technologies as a practical path to securing IoT, UAVs and critical infrastructure endpoints that cannot support traditional AI models.
Market and strategic implications
Darwin Monkey 3 symbolizes more than a technological achievement; it reflects geopolitical competition in next‑generation AI hardware. The ability to deploy neuromorphic systems across healthcare, ICS, defense, logistics and security may shape both national resilience and private‑sector competitiveness. Importantly, as Furber notes, the hardware is ready — but the ecosystem isn’t. Development tools akin to TensorFlow or PyTorch are still emerging (e.g., PyNN, Lava), and convergence toward standards will be crucial for widespread adoption (
IEEE Spectrum, 2024).
Adding to this, a 2025–2035 global market forecast projects significant growth in neuromorphic computing and sensing, spanning sectors such as healthcare, automotive, logistics, aerospace and cybersecurity. The study profiles more than 140 companies, from established giants like Intel and IBM to startups such as
BrainChip and Prophesee, which are releasing joint products now, underscoring the breadth of investment and innovation. It also emphasizes challenges in standardization, tooling and supply chain readiness, suggesting that
the race will not just be technological but also commercial and regulatory.
Ethics and sustainability
As neuromorphic computing matures, ethical and sustainability considerations will shape adoption as much as raw performance. Spiking neural networks’ efficiency reduces carbon footprints by cutting energy demands compared to GPUs,
aligning with global decarbonization targets. At the same time, ensuring that neuromorphic models are transparent, bias‑aware and auditable is critical for applications in healthcare, defense and finance. Calls for AI governance frameworks now explicitly include neuromorphic AI, reflecting its potential role in high‑stakes decision‑making. Embedding sustainability and ethics into the neuromorphic roadmap will ensure that efficiency gains do not come at the cost of fairness or accountability.
A paradigm shift in AI?
Will Darwin Monkey 3 spark a paradigm shift in AI? The answer lies in adoption and integration. Neuromorphic computing is no longer theoretical — it is moving into applied domains from healthcare to logistics to cybersecurity. Yet the field still searches for its “killer app” — a domain where neuromorphic’s efficiency and adaptability decisively outperform conventional AI. As industries face rising energy costs and escalating cyber‑physical risks, neuromorphic solutions offer a forward‑looking path that blends efficiency, adaptability, resilience and responsibility.
This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?
by
Daniel Hoffman
Contributor
- Follow Daniel Hoffman on LinkedIn
Daniel Hoffman is a veteran IT and cybersecurity leader with over two decades of experience across healthcare, retail, software and finance. He began his career at Symantec and later joined GoldMine Software, where he helped develop content for the GoldSync Server 5.0 technical certification platform. Today, Daniel supports small to mid-sized businesses in navigating cybersecurity, business continuity, disaster recovery and regulatory compliance. He holds certifications including CISSP, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, and Privacy Law and HIPAA from the University of Pennsylvania. A lifelong learner, Daniel is currently focused on physical security, compliance, and IT/OT convergence. He is an active member of both ISSA and ISC2 and values the opportunity to grow through collaboration with peers in the cybersecurity community. Daniel is also a strong advocate for security awareness training as a foundational layer of risk management.
I’m curious how the market would react if they would answer something like “unfortunately yes” 
.
️ Our super-intelligent operating system, MB.OS.
. 
