BRN Discussion Ongoing

uiux

Regular
Looks like MB.OS is a rebranding of QNX out of Waterloo uni.

QNX is already in use in all the major car makers vehicles - BMW, Bosch, Continental, Dongfeng Motor, Geely, Ford, Honda, Subaru, Toyota, Volkswagen, Volvo, and more.

So, it looks to me that we've been used by MB in a slimy sort of way.

In fact QNX is an Unix-like, real-time operating system that is embedded in not only cars, but medical devices, machinery, and other devices.So I wonder if BRN will produce drivers for QNX as well as linux?



Found something all good

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users

Iseki

Regular
"Looks like MB.OS is a rebranding of QNX out of Waterloo uni."




Where is this info from
I think it is a valid question to ask: is MB really writing their own OS or is it a re-branding of an existing OS.
I haven't seen MB answer the question, but I do know that back in the day QNX was the OS for realtime data routing. It's from Waterloo Uni, and a quick google will show that it's already in about 300million vehicles plus medical devices, and lo and behold, the owners of QNX, Blackberry, are suddenly (last month) pushing its public awareness.

I don't have any proof other than the above, which seems to be logical, and if true, might mean that we should understand what it means.

There are people here on this forum who are currently writing AKD1000 drivers for Windows.

What do you think?
 

Iseki

Regular
Found something all good

Yes, well. As you are probably aware much of the performance saving may be the simple fact that they are running a form of QNX, a micro-kernel OS.

On the one hand MB.OS is just a rebranding of QNX, and so we shouldn't expect too much from them.
On the other hand if MB are smart enough to select QNX, they might be smart enough to select Akida.

Either way the question remains: Why no Akida driver for QNX?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

uiux

Regular
Yes, well. As you are probably aware much of the performance saving may be the simple fact that they are running a form of QNX, a micro-kernel OS.

On the one hand MB.OS is just a rebranding of QNX, and so we shouldn't expect too much from them.
On the other hand if MB are smart enough to select QNX, they might be smart enough to select Akida.

Either way the question remains: Why no Akida driver for QNX?


If they have based MB.OS off QNX they would just write their own proprietary driver.


Mercedes are designing MSOCs. They don't need drivers for pcie cards, they will likely be working with chips on their own interfaces
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
1740386723720.png


 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Team refinement ……

IMG_3849.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

overpup

Regular
I know someone perfect for the job, but I hear he just started a new position at some GPU mob..
They don't mention 'loyalty' in the must-haves, so he might be able to get back in...
 
  • Fire
Reactions: 1 users

Iseki

Regular
If they have based MB.OS off QNX they would just write their own proprietary driver.


Mercedes are designing MSOCs. They don't need drivers for pcie cards, they will likely be working with chips on their own interfaces
Yep, Those MSOC's 'll transform your plebean vehicle from thirsty gas guzzler to thrifty gaslighter. Good luck to them! My skyline had a minicomputer, and all MB's had was automatic fuel openers that opened when the level got low. Those feckers use to open all the time.
 
Top Bottom