BRN Discussion Ongoing

Iseki

Regular
Good Afternoon Chippers ,

Once again iv taken the liberty of stealing this from the other forum.

Cheers StockHound , these numbers also correspond with the last update on price compiled by RockerRothsGettyFellerChild LLC which stood at a conservative $7.117 Au on 9th July 2024.

😃.

NOTE , The attached has been generated by ChatGPT.

View attachment 77588
View attachment 77590

View attachment 77589
View attachment 77591
View attachment 77592 View attachment 77593 View attachment 77594 View attachment 77595 Dam it , still can't cut and past the whole picture.

The crapper,
Poster , StockHound81
Today @ 11:00

If a savvy Chipper would be so kind as to retrieve this from the crapper site , and post for all to have a ponder.

Thankyou in advance.

#Well i certainly made mess of that , sorry all 😄

Regards,
Esq.
The trouble is, is that no one can buy BRN and add $$ to their bottom line.

What failing mega companies usually do is acquire acretive companies so that they can add their profit to their own, and not incur any outgoings, and it looks to their shareholders that the company is being well run.

So we are not going to get any company looking to do this as we don't have any revenue. ie Intel, boeing, Northrop etc etc are out.

So who is left?

Well Frontgrade are privately owned - they don't have to spin a narrative to their share holders. They also are in our line of business - designing specialist chips for space and defense. They also want to keep whatever moat they have and yes, airbus does pay Eu90K per chip if it makes a 6 Million euro satelite work.

Frontgrade has licensed us.

So here is what is a probable scenario: Frontgrade owners will buy 10% BRN, get their specialist akida chips fabbed, build models for lots of things, and do what BRN always threatened to do - disrupt.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 5 users
Not sure if this is leading to anything but when I had a read through the Nintendo Switch 2 Wikipedia page, I came across something interesting:

"The new Joy-Con, besides being larger to match the larger console, attach to the console by snapping to the sides rather than using a rail system from the original Switch, and are removed using a small button on the Joy-Con that causes a cylinder in the Joy-Con to extend and push off from the main unit.[38] Industry rumors suggest the Joy-Con attachment to the main body is through magnetic attachment rather than a physical connector,[39] which had been desired in the original Switch design.[40][41] Reports state that the new Joy-Con will utilize Hall effect sensors for the joysticks rather than normal analog joysticks, which would address the drift issues that the original models had due to dust collecting within the analog system.[42] Journalists also noted the presence of an optical sensor on the Joy-Con, along with a re-designed wrist strap attachment that included a front button and pads, which the Joy-Con can slot into, believing this to indicate the Joy-Con could be used like a computer mouse.[39][43] The possible magnetic connections and mouse functionality were supported by multiple patents awarded to Nintendo in February 2025 for such functionalities in a game controller.[44][45]"

So I did a Google search on 'Hall sensor neuromorphic', and this came up:

"AI Overview
Hall sensors and Hall effect sensors can be used in neuromorphic computing, which is a brain-inspired approach to computing.

How Hall sensors are used:

Hall sensors can detect and measure magnetic fields.

Hall effect sensors can measure the magnitude and direction of magnetic fields.

Hall effect sensors can sense proximity, position, and speed.

How Hall sensors are used in neuromorphic computing:

Hall sensors can be used to create synapses, which are memory elements in neuromorphic computing.

Hall sensors can be used to create artificial neurons, which are computing elements in neuromorphic computing.

Hall sensors can be used to create neuromorphic spintronics, which are energy-efficient and scalable."
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 41 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
Question: Esq: what price are you refering to when you mention, "...last update on price compiled by RockerRothsGettyFellerChild LLC which stood at a conservative $7.117 Au on 9th July 2024."?

BTW a buyout between 0-12 months at $7p/s would be great :)
Evening Humble Genius ,

The ,RockerRothsGettyFellerChild LLC , was my attempt at humour, which has inputs from my workings on the numbers & what I belive to be a fair valuation at that time , needles to say there have been numerous entitys, partners etc added since then ..... so my fair price has risen since then .

A fellow Chipper may be able to locate & post my last report .

Obviously this is not and was not to be relied on as financial advice.

For what it's worth.... some time ago (4 to 5 years ago ) Deloitte had a fair , guestimat on our share price of some $16.00 Au from memory.
* This firm is certified for providing financial advice , on a global scale .

Love for the Deloitte report to be shared again also, if any Chipper has it close at hand , though out dated showes thay also saw the potential way back then.


Regards,
Esq.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 15 users

jtardif999

Regular
Not sure if this is leading to anything but when I had a read through the Nintendo Switch 2 Wikipedia page, I came across something interesting:

"The new Joy-Con, besides being larger to match the larger console, attach to the console by snapping to the sides rather than using a rail system from the original Switch, and are removed using a small button on the Joy-Con that causes a cylinder in the Joy-Con to extend and push off from the main unit.[38] Industry rumors suggest the Joy-Con attachment to the main body is through magnetic attachment rather than a physical connector,[39] which had been desired in the original Switch design.[40][41] Reports state that the new Joy-Con will utilize Hall effect sensors for the joysticks rather than normal analog joysticks, which would address the drift issues that the original models had due to dust collecting within the analog system.[42] Journalists also noted the presence of an optical sensor on the Joy-Con, along with a re-designed wrist strap attachment that included a front button and pads, which the Joy-Con can slot into, believing this to indicate the Joy-Con could be used like a computer mouse.[39][43] The possible magnetic connections and mouse functionality were supported by multiple patents awarded to Nintendo in February 2025 for such functionalities in a game controller.[44][45]"

So I did a Google search on 'Hall sensor neuromorphic', and this came up:

"AI Overview
Hall sensors and Hall effect sensors can be used in neuromorphic computing, which is a brain-inspired approach to computing.

How Hall sensors are used:

Hall sensors can detect and measure magnetic fields.

Hall effect sensors can measure the magnitude and direction of magnetic fields.

Hall effect sensors can sense proximity, position, and speed.

How Hall sensors are used in neuromorphic computing:

Hall sensors can be used to create synapses, which are memory elements in neuromorphic computing.

Hall sensors can be used to create artificial neurons, which are computing elements in neuromorphic computing.

Hall sensors can be used to create neuromorphic spintronics, which are energy-efficient and scalable."
Now I read a post either here or on the crapper about TSMC producing chips that utilise spintronics 🤔
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

Baneino

Regular
I have the feeling that some people here are very tense about our beloved brainship. I can only recommend to stay calm and be patient, because brainship will make its way. I am very relaxed because my shares will stay put for at least another 18 years or more and there will be ups and downs that I will take with me. For me there is only one option and that is to buy, if anyone has no nerves I recommend maybe taking 30 to 40 days vacation and not looking at prices or what brainship is doing or not doing. I love you all. Best regards from Germany ♥️
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 33 users
I have the feeling that some people here are very tense about our beloved brainship. I can only recommend to stay calm and be patient, because brainship will make its way. I am very relaxed because my shares will stay put for at least another 18 years or more and there will be ups and downs that I will take with me. For me there is only one option and that is to buy, if anyone has no nerves I recommend maybe taking 30 to 40 days vacation and not looking at prices or what brainship is doing or not doing. I love you all. Best regards from Germany ♥️
Not sure many here, have the luxury of waiting another 18 years, me included..

Some think A.S.I. will be here before the end of the decade now.
Nobody really knows what that will mean, but probably not good, at least further down the track.

I'm hoping we'll be full steam ahead, within the next couple.
Sean said we were on the cusp of recurring revenue (I think in the quarterly before last).

I reckon that relates to the Nintendo Switch 2, which will certainly get things rolling nicely, if correct.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 33 users
Now I read a post either here or on the crapper about TSMC producing chips that utilise spintronics 🤔
Here is a Google search on neuromorphic spintronics, which gives some interesting info on how Nintendo could incorporate and benefit from this:

"Spintronics-based neuromorphic computing, in the context of Nintendo, could potentially refer to the development of future gaming consoles or peripherals that utilize the principles of spintronics to create highly efficient, brain-like computing systems for advanced AI features within games, potentially leading to more realistic and responsive gameplay experiences with significantly lower power consumption compared to traditional processors; however, currently, there is no public information about Nintendo actively pursuing this technology in their consoles.

Key points to understand:
  • Spintronics:
    A technology that leverages the spin of electrons to store and manipulate information, offering potential for faster, more energy-efficient computing compared to traditional electronics.

  • Neuromorphic computing:
    A computing paradigm inspired by the human brain, aiming to mimic the structure and function of neurons and synapses for high-performance, low-power computation.
How it could benefit Nintendo:
  • Advanced AI in games:
    By incorporating spintronic neuromorphic computing, Nintendo could develop more sophisticated AI opponents or non-player characters that exhibit more complex behaviors and adapt to player actions in real-time.

  • Improved graphics and physics:
    This technology could potentially enable more realistic simulations of complex environments and physics due to its ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently.

  • Power efficiency:
    Spintronics could lead to reduced power consumption in future consoles, potentially extending battery life for handheld devices.
Important considerations:
  • Early stage of development:
    While research in spintronics and neuromorphic computing is promising, the technology is still in its early stages and may not be readily applicable to consumer electronics like Nintendo consoles in the near future.
  • Technical challenges:
    Implementing spintronic devices at the scale required for gaming consoles presents significant engineering challenges."
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
Pretty positive week i thought.
Last Fridays close of 28c and yesterday closing at 31c.
No announcements apart from employee incentive options.
And yesterday was the largest volume traded for the week.
Better that drifting back to the mid or low 20's
Looking forward to the coming months with excitement and a few corks ready to pop.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 32 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Howdy All,

I just stumbled upon this research paper titled "A Diagonal State Space Model on Loihi 2 for Efficient Streaming Sequence Processing." It is currently under double-blind review for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2025, which will take place from 24–28 April, 2025.

As the title suggests, the paper focuses on Intel's Loihi 2. While it doesn’t mention BrainChip’s Akida technology, it is still highly relevant to us, as Loihi 2 and Akida are frequently compared as cutting-edge neuromorphic computing platforms.

The study highlights Loihi 2’s exceptional efficiency in online token-by-token inference, stating that it "consumes approximately 1000x less energy with a 75x lower latency and a 75x higher throughput compared to the recurrent implementation of n-S4D on the Jetson GPU."

It also states "our results provide the first benchmarks of an SSM on a neuromorphic hardware platform versus an edge GPU, comparing both the recurrent and convolution modes and revealing the differences in energy, latency, throughput, and task accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most holistic picture to date of the merits of neuromorphic hardware for SSM efficiency."

The authors emphasize the broader impact of their findings, stating:

"Our work and potential optimizations and extensions can be applied and tested in real-world streaming use cases, such as keyword-spotting, audio denoising, vision for drone control, autonomous driving, and other latency- or energy-constrained domains."

While I’m not as technically proficient as many in this forum, it stands to reason that if Loihi 2 demonstrates extreme efficiency in online token-by-token inference, the same should apply to BrainChip’s Akida neural processor.

If so, this would be yet another strong validation that Akida is ideally suited for applications requiring low latency and ultra-low power consumption such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and speech enhancement.




Extract 1
Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 11.11.16 am.png



Extract 2


Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 11.09.49 am.png


 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 23 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Not sure many here, have the luxury of waiting another 18 years, me included..

Some think A.S.I. will be here before the end of the decade now.
Nobody really knows what that will mean, but probably not good, at least further down the track.

I'm hoping we'll be full steam ahead, within the next couple.
Sean said we were on the cusp of recurring revenue (I think in the quarterly before last).

I reckon that relates to the Nintendo Switch 2, which will certainly get things rolling nicely, if correct.
Hi Dingo,

Assuming our technology is involved in Nintendo Switch 2, I've been trying to get a feel for the type of revenue we could expect once sales start to ramp up.

I asked ChatGPT, how many Switch 2's would be projected to be sold each year on the basis of past sales and it said:

"Based on historical sales data and industry projections, the Nintendo Switch 2 is expected to achieve significant sales figures in its initial years. Analysts project that the console will sell between 15 and 17 million units in its first year, with total sales surpassing 80 million units by 2028." famiboards.com

For context, the original Nintendo Switch, released in 2017, has sold over 150 million units as of December 2024, making it one of Nintendo's most successful consoles.

As far as understand it, royalty calculations would depend on several factors, including licensing agreements and the pricing model used.

OPTION 1) The most common calculation appears to be "Per-Unit Royalty".
  • Example: If the agreed royalty is $1 per unit and Nintendo sells 20 million units, BrainChip would earn $20 million in royalties.
OPTION 2) Another calculation could be "Percentage of Product Revenue" similar to how ARM sometimes structures deals.
  • Example: If Nintendo sells the console for $400 and BrainChip gets 0.5% of sales, that’s $2 per unit.
According to the two options above, and so long as the analysts are actually correct about the projected 80 million units expected to being sold by 2028, then that would equate to the following potential revenue over the next 2.5 years.

  • UNDER OPTION 1) $80 million
  • UNDER OPTION 2) $160 million
Obviously, these figures are just an example only because I have no idea what price or percentage per unit BrainChip has negotiated.

I guess, we're all going to know at a certain point, once sales start, whether we begin to see those sales reflected in our Quarterly Reports. If revenue comes in around this time-frame, it'll be pretty darn oblivious it's from Megachips, because it's not like we have an other potential opportunities that would sell that sort of quantity of units.

And, if we don't receive any revenue at all by October, then I'd say it would be fairly obvious we are not involved and we'll all have to toddle off to the pub to drown our sorrows.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users

Diogenese

Top 20
... or we could start preemptory sorrow-drowning now, and be nicely primed when we are proven wrong.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 22 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
How good would it be if Arm decides to incorporate our technology into it's own chips to set it apart from other chip companies offerings?

Recent reports indicate that Arm intends to launch the chip by mid-2025, with expectations to unveil it as early as this summer.

Since Arm already has access to our technology, they could already be testing it as part of their prototype, so presumably they wouldn't have to obtain a licence from us until just prior to the launch.

It wouldn't be a stretch to think that our technology would be a competitive differentiation for Arm against Qualcomm because of Qualcomm's focus on edge AI applications and low-power AI. Given the legal disputes over Nuvia, Arm would probably want to push further into AI acceleration to gain an edge over Qualcomm and reduce its reliance on licensing revenue from them.

For what it's worth, here's what ChatGPT had to say about why integrating BrainChip’s neuromorphic technology could be a very smart move for Arm.





Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 1.55.32 pm.png


Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 2.16.24 pm.png






Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 1.52.09 pm.png






 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 28 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
This Forbes article (see below) was only published online 13 hours ago and it should be read bearing in mind what our very own Tony Lewis had to say on Linkedin just 2 weeks go.

Yet another reason for arm to seriously consider incorporating our technology into their new chips...



Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 3.00.57 pm.png










Qualcomm Could Benefit Most From DeepSeek’s New, Smaller AI​

Karl Freund
Contributor
Founder and Principal Analyst, Cambrian-AI Research LLC
Follow


Feb 14, 2025,10:10am EST
Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon

Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon

While the Deep Seek Moment crashed most semiconductor stocks as investors feared lower demand for data center AI chips, these new, smaller AI models are just the ticket for on-device AI. “DeepSeek R1 and other similar models recently demonstrated that AI models are developing faster, becoming smaller, more capable and efficient, and now able to run directly on device,” said Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon at the company’s recent earnings call. And within less than a week, DeepSeek R1-distilled models were running on Qualcomm Snapdragon-powered PCs and smartphones. (Qualcomm is a client of Cambrian-AI Research.)


While both Apple and Qualcomm will benefit from these new models, Qualcomm can quickly apply these models beyond smart phones; the company has strong positions in other markets such as automotive, robotics, and VR headsets, as well as the company’s emerging PC business. All these markets will benefit from the new smaller models and the applications built on them.

Apple is famous for its beautiful fully integrated designs, but Qualcomm partners with others to design and build the final product, speeding time to market and enabling broader adoption. For example, Qualcomm Snapdragon chips power both Meta Quest and Rayban headsets, which enjoy over 70% market share.

Major Trends Accelerating On-device AI​

Qualcomm and Apple have both been working hard to reduce model size through lower precision math and model optimization techniques such as pruning and sparsity. Now, with distillation, we are seeing step-function improvement in the quality, performance, and efficiency of AI models that can now run on device. And these smaller models do not demand users to compromise.


These new state-of-the-art smaller AI models have superior performance thanks to techniques like model distillation and novel AI network architectures, which simplify the development process without sacrificing quality. These smaller models can outperform larger ones which really only operate in the cloud.

In addition, the size of models continues to decrease rapidly. State-of-the-art quantization and pruning techniques allow developers to reduce the size of models with no material drop in accuracy.



The table below shows that the distilled versions of both the DeepSeek Qwen and Meta Llama models perform as well or better than the larger and more expensive state of the art models from OpenAI and Mistral. The GPQA Diamond benchmark is particularly interesting, as that model involves deep, multi-step reasoning to solve complex queries, which many models find challenging.
The new DeepSeek-R1 shows significantly better results (accuracy) across all math and coding benchmarks vs Open AI and Claude.

The new DeepSeek-R1 shows significantly better results (accuracy) across all math and coding ... [+]
QUALCOMM

So, Do You Really Need On-device AI?​

The market skepticism around on-device AI is fading fast. Here is an example use case that Qualcomm has provided. Imagine you are driving along and one of your passengers mentions coffee. An LLM agent hears this and suggests a place along the route where you can stop and grab a cup. Since the local driving LLM and ADAS systems are local, a cloud-based AI cannot perform this task. This is but one example of how agents will transform AI and are especially useful on-device.
Here is a great use case for LLM Agents in a car.  Coffee anyone?

Here is a great use case for LLM Agents in a car. Coffee anyone?
QUALCOMM

So, the AI World Isn’t Crashing?​

Not in the least. In fact, we would say that these new models are a tipping point for ubiquitous AI. Smaller, more efficient, and accurate AI models are key to helping make AI pervasive and affordable. Consequently, techniques demonstrated by DeepSeek are already being applied by the mainstream AI companies to keep them competitive and avoid the pitfalls of censorship and security that DeepSeek presents.
And Qualcomm is perhaps the biggest winner in this evolution of models towards affordable AI that fits and runs well on the devices that already number in the billions.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 3.00.57 pm.png
    Screenshot 2025-02-15 at 3.00.57 pm.png
    192.7 KB · Views: 37
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users
Hi Dingo,

Assuming our technology is involved in Nintendo Switch 2, I've been trying to get a feel for the type of revenue we could expect once sales start to ramp up.

I asked ChatGPT, how many Switch 2's would be projected to be sold each year on the basis of past sales and it said:

"Based on historical sales data and industry projections, the Nintendo Switch 2 is expected to achieve significant sales figures in its initial years. Analysts project that the console will sell between 15 and 17 million units in its first year, with total sales surpassing 80 million units by 2028." famiboards.com

For context, the original Nintendo Switch, released in 2017, has sold over 150 million units as of December 2024, making it one of Nintendo's most successful consoles.

As far as understand it, royalty calculations would depend on several factors, including licensing agreements and the pricing model used.

OPTION 1) The most common calculation appears to be "Per-Unit Royalty".
  • Example: If the agreed royalty is $1 per unit and Nintendo sells 20 million units, BrainChip would earn $20 million in royalties.
OPTION 2) Another calculation could be "Percentage of Product Revenue" similar to how ARM sometimes structures deals.
  • Example: If Nintendo sells the console for $400 and BrainChip gets 0.5% of sales, that’s $2 per unit.
According to the two options above, and so long as the analysts are actually correct about the projected 80 million units expected to being sold by 2028, then that would equate to the following potential revenue over the next 2.5 years.

  • UNDER OPTION 1) $80 million
  • UNDER OPTION 2) $160 million
Obviously, these figures are just an example only because I have no idea what price or percentage per unit BrainChip has negotiated.

I guess, we're all going to know at a certain point, once sales start, whether we begin to see those sales reflected in our Quarterly Reports. If revenue comes in around this time-frame, it'll be pretty darn oblivious it's from Megachips, because it's not like we have an other potential opportunities that would sell that sort of quantity of units.

And, if we don't receive any revenue at all by October, then I'd say it would be fairly obvious we are not involved and we'll all have to toddle off to the pub to drown our sorrows.
I have a feeling it may be more like option 1, Bravo and $1 might by overly optimistic..

MegaChips licenced us, to make themselves money, not us, so the royalty we get, will be a fraction of what "they're" making and we would only be a very small part of what makes the Switch 2 jiggle, overall.

So I think more like 30 to 50 cents would be closer to the mark..

Unit sales is the big question..

With ARM, RISK-V and Intel, they are among our "Technology Partners" so it may work differently, as far as their need for an IP Licence.

Nintendo will be a good appetiser, to stop the stomach grumbles, but we still need a main course..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 17 users
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users
Just watched the CES video from a couple of weeks ago and I noticed the "streaming" on the banner. I've never seen that in thir marketing and wondering if there is a potential change in direction?

1739598520653.png
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Wow
Reactions: 15 users

Diogenese

Top 20
I have a feeling it may be more like option 1, Bravo and $1 might by overly optimistic..

MegaChips licenced us, to make themselves money, not us, so the royalty we get, will be a fraction of what "they're" making and we would only be a very small part of what makes the Switch 2 jiggle, overall.

So I think more like 30 to 50 cents would be closer to the mark..

Unit sales is the big question..

With ARM, RISK-V and Intel, they are among our "Technology Partners" so it may work differently, as far as their need for an IP Licence.

Nintendo will be a good appetiser, to stop the stomach grumbles, but we still need a main course..
Hi DB,

ARM may have used a per unit royalty in the past, but they are now seeking a larger slice of the pie, trying to get a higher return more in line with what they consider to be the capability/benefit enabled by their processsors, for example, in the form of a percentage of sales.

I guess ARM's IP licensing market is multi-faceted, such as companies who make ARM processors as COTS product, as compared with end product manufacturers who incorporate ARM processor IP as part of a SoC in their commercial products. eg, Qualcomm.

ARM's proposed chip manufacturing business model would be of more concern to the first group, the COTS ARM processor manufacturers.

A percent of sales model would be more complex to implement in the SoC case as far as attributing revenue between the elements of the SoC, but I suppose they could work out some formula based on the straight ARM processor sales royalty.

It does not seem unreasonable to base royalties on what the processor can do rather than on what it costs to make. Of course that has to be assessed in comparison with competitive products.

It's all too complicated for me.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users

TECH

Regular
Gidday...I think I'm right in saying that Dr. Tony Lewis is the first senior executive to actually verbally name a competitor to Brainchip, when he recently stated that Dr. Chris Eliasmith CTO at Applied Brain Research had been working on state space models (ssm) as well, while we have developed our TENN's model.

Interesting he mentioned that, not a company we would neccessarily think of first, I don't ever remember Peter or Anil ever publicly mentioning a competitor, maybe someone will correct me on that.

Tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Gidday...I think I'm right in saying that Dr. Tony Lewis is the first senior executive to actually verbally name a competitor to Brainchip, when he recently stated that Dr. Chris Eliasmith CTO at Applied Brain Research had been working on state space models (ssm) as well, while we have developed our TENN's model.

Interesting he mentioned that, not a company we would neccessarily think of first, I don't ever remember Peter or Anil ever publicly mentioning a competitor, maybe someone will correct me on that.

Tech.
Curioser and curioser ...

https://brainchip.com/brainchip-sig...keting-agreement-with-applied-brain-research/

BrainChip Signs Joint Development and Marketing Agreement with Applied Brain Research 01.02.2016​

ALISO VIEJO, CA — (Marketwired) — 02/01/16 — BrainChip, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of BrainChip Holdings Limited (ASX: BRN), a developer of a revolutionary new Spiking Neuron Adaptive Processor (SNAP) technology that has the ability to learn autonomously, evolve and associate information just like the human brain, has signed a strategic, joint development and marketing agreement with Applied Brain Research.
...
The partnership with BrainChip represents a significant opportunity for our team to work with a breakthrough company,” said Dr. Chris Eliasmith, Co-founder of Applied Brain Research. “We believe neuromorphic semiconductor chips will run the next generation of AI systems, and BrainChip’s hardware technology is a complete development solution for companies entering the neuromorphic chip market.”
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 37 users

MDhere

Top 20
Howdy All,

I just stumbled upon this research paper titled "A Diagonal State Space Model on Loihi 2 for Efficient Streaming Sequence Processing." It is currently under double-blind review for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2025, which will take place from 24–28 April, 2025.

As the title suggests, the paper focuses on Intel's Loihi 2. While it doesn’t mention BrainChip’s Akida technology, it is still highly relevant to us, as Loihi 2 and Akida are frequently compared as cutting-edge neuromorphic computing platforms.

The study highlights Loihi 2’s exceptional efficiency in online token-by-token inference, stating that it "consumes approximately 1000x less energy with a 75x lower latency and a 75x higher throughput compared to the recurrent implementation of n-S4D on the Jetson GPU."

It also states "our results provide the first benchmarks of an SSM on a neuromorphic hardware platform versus an edge GPU, comparing both the recurrent and convolution modes and revealing the differences in energy, latency, throughput, and task accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most holistic picture to date of the merits of neuromorphic hardware for SSM efficiency."

The authors emphasize the broader impact of their findings, stating:

"Our work and potential optimizations and extensions can be applied and tested in real-world streaming use cases, such as keyword-spotting, audio denoising, vision for drone control, autonomous driving, and other latency- or energy-constrained domains."

While I’m not as technically proficient as many in this forum, it stands to reason that if Loihi 2 demonstrates extreme efficiency in online token-by-token inference, the same should apply to BrainChip’s Akida neural processor.

If so, this would be yet another strong validation that Akida is ideally suited for applications requiring low latency and ultra-low power consumption such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and speech enhancement.




Extract 1
View attachment 77607


Extract 2


View attachment 77608


Howdy All,

I just stumbled upon this research paper titled "A Diagonal State Space Model on Loihi 2 for Efficient Streaming Sequence Processing." It is currently under double-blind review for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2025, which will take place from 24–28 April, 2025.

As the title suggests, the paper focuses on Intel's Loihi 2. While it doesn’t mention BrainChip’s Akida technology, it is still highly relevant to us, as Loihi 2 and Akida are frequently compared as cutting-edge neuromorphic computing platforms.

The study highlights Loihi 2’s exceptional efficiency in online token-by-token inference, stating that it "consumes approximately 1000x less energy with a 75x lower latency and a 75x higher throughput compared to the recurrent implementation of n-S4D on the Jetson GPU."

It also states "our results provide the first benchmarks of an SSM on a neuromorphic hardware platform versus an edge GPU, comparing both the recurrent and convolution modes and revealing the differences in energy, latency, throughput, and task accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most holistic picture to date of the merits of neuromorphic hardware for SSM efficiency."

The authors emphasize the broader impact of their findings, stating:

"Our work and potential optimizations and extensions can be applied and tested in real-world streaming use cases, such as keyword-spotting, audio denoising, vision for drone control, autonomous driving, and other latency- or energy-constrained domains."

While I’m not as technically proficient as many in this forum, it stands to reason that if Loihi 2 demonstrates extreme efficiency in online token-by-token inference, the same should apply to BrainChip’s Akida neural processor.

If so, this would be yet another strong validation that Akida is ideally suited for applications requiring low latency and ultra-low power consumption such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and speech enhancement.




Extract 1
View attachment 77607


Extract 2


View attachment 77608

You had me at the words stumbled upon. I started singing and movin to the song stumblin in. Anyway its one of those nights where I clearly need to sleep now lol Happy weekend fellow brners. I know I've nothing to contribute tonight apart from some sing song in my mind, but well done to all of you :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: 13 users
Top Bottom