AARONASX
Holding onto what I've got
Is Number #2 Shorter as brainchip charts behind him are going up!?GOOD MORNING !!!! Choose your mindset! type 1. For 1 and 2. For 2
1
View attachment 73508
2
View attachment 73510
Is Number #2 Shorter as brainchip charts behind him are going up!?GOOD MORNING !!!! Choose your mindset! type 1. For 1 and 2. For 2
1
View attachment 73508
2
View attachment 73510
No, I think there are a lot of long term holder who feel like this even they are generally positiv. Maybe because they can’t stand the pressure any more or something.Is Number #2 Shorter as brainchip charts behind him are going up!?
I believe he sold himself to the company on a 5 year plan. That gives him 2 more years to prove himself. That doesn't mean he should only have a deal done before the 5 years is up but 2025 is important not only to us but also to him.Companies are willing to pay $2,000 per day because they expect a solid return on investment.
Over Sean’s three years in charge, it’s been difficult to see evidence of that return.
Yep - BRN have said many things. None of which have happened.This is what happens when a company is significantly undervalued.
You should google on 'Elcid Investments Ltd'. It has gone up 66,92,535% in a single trading session a few weeks ago!
"Elcid Investments Limited set a record for its share price when it increased by 66,92,535% in a SINGLE TRADING SESSION.
The increase occurred during a call auction organized by the BSE and NSE, which is designed to help investment holding companies discover their fair value."
If Sean can seal a big contract in the coming months, this baby could gap up significantly!
According to Sean's recent Youtube Interview in November, Sean said he is VERY bullish and he thinks that 2025 will be the year. Sean also said that he even anticipates in the next COUPLE of months things are all positive for Brainchip!!!
I have looked up the definition of 'couple'. It means '2', less than 3...
Please go to youtube and search 'brainchip ceo interview' by Stocks Down Under.
If you are time-strapped, just spend 29 seconds to listen from the 1 minute mark to the 1:29 mark.
Fingers crossed. lol![]()
Why shouldn't they be accountable? People invest in the company based on these comments. They are being paid millions of dollars per year to deliver on making the business profitable and providing returns for shareholders. If what they are saying has not come to fruition, then shouldn't there be some recourse?If some are wondering why BrainChip doesn’t communicate externally as actively as some might wish, hoping this would suddenly push the stock to $20 per share and skyrocket its valuation, consider this: if something like that were to happen, the question would be whether a small company like BrainChip could handle the enormous pressure of continuously meeting such high expectations to maintain that level. I think it wouldn’t be healthy, as the internal structures are not yet solidified.
Keep in mind that every success also brings additional pressure. Isn’t it much better to focus on organization, improving products, presenting these improvements to potential customers, and building something together calmly and steadily? Rather than constantly promising the moon and delivering nothing in the end.
The company once dared to speak positively about the future, and even that has led to many criticizing the board for allegedly not delivering or doing their job. Quotes like: “Where are the contracts, Sean?” … “Tick-Tock” or “Pack your luggage” are good examples.
I remain confident as there’s no negative news out there. Long-term holder here.
I had a brief chat with Tony about this.If some are wondering why BrainChip doesn’t communicate externally as actively as some might wish, hoping this would suddenly push the stock to $20 per share and skyrocket its valuation, consider this: if something like that were to happen, the question would be whether a small company like BrainChip could handle the enormous pressure of continuously meeting such high expectations to maintain that level. I think it wouldn’t be healthy, as the internal structures are not yet solidified.
Keep in mind that every success also brings additional pressure. Isn’t it much better to focus on organization, improving products, presenting these improvements to potential customers, and building something together calmly and steadily? Rather than constantly promising the moon and delivering nothing in the end.
The company once dared to speak positively about the future, and even that has led to many criticizing the board for allegedly not delivering or doing their job. Quotes like: “Where are the contracts, Sean?” … “Tick-Tock” or “Pack your luggage” are good examples.
I remain confident as there’s no negative news out there. Long-term holder here.
They are accountable, to each of us.Why shouldn't they be accountable? People invest in the company based on these comments. They are being paid millions of dollars per year to deliver on making the business profitable and providing returns for shareholders. If what they are saying has not come to fruition, then shouldn't there be some recourse?
Also, this price action today is poop.
Sorry if I have to disagree here. We live in a capitalist society. CEOs in such positions, who are expected to turn a startup into a significant company, certainly won’t work for free. These are standard amounts. Just because some people can’t handle such sums doesn’t mean they are exorbitant salaries. Criticism is, of course, valid, but I wouldn’t give up my salary either… would you? As I said, since the last AGM, nothing has changed for me… products are being improved, and partnerships are being expanded. We have plenty of positive developments. Revenues and contracts will follow. Just my positive opinion. And if the board questions Sean’s performance because they see no progress, then I will trust them. But certainly not someone who has zero insight into internal structural processes… Please, come on.Why shouldn't they be accountable? People invest in the company based on these comments. They are being paid millions of dollars per year to deliver on making the business profitable and providing returns for shareholders. If what they are saying has not come to fruition, then shouldn't there be some recourse?
Also, this price action today is poop.
You're entitled to your opinion.Sorry if I have to disagree here. We live in a capitalist society. CEOs in such positions, who are expected to turn a startup into a significant company, certainly won’t work for free. These are standard amounts. Just because some people can’t handle such sums doesn’t mean they are exorbitant salaries. Criticism is, of course, valid, but I wouldn’t give up my salary either… would you? As I said, since the last AGM, nothing has changed for me… products are being improved, and partnerships are being expanded. We have plenty of positive developments. Revenues and contracts will follow. Just my positive opinion. And if the board questions Sean’s performance because they see no progress, then I will trust them. But certainly not someone who has zero insight into internal structural processes… Please, come on.
Always positive my friend… if you’re negativ on something, stop it, change it, move on, or let it be.You're entitled to your opinion.
And good on you for having a positive opinion when our company's value continues to slide to the negative.
Altmann is not the messiah ...Some relevant background information here is that Sam Altman (OpenAI) had committed to a $51 million investment in AI chips from Rain AI in a letter of intent signed in 2019. The agreement committed OpenAI to purchase Rain's chips upon production. At that point in time Rain AI was focused on developing neuromorphic chips.
Since then, Rain AI no longer promotes the term neuromorphic technology, choosing instead to describe their chip efforts as novel compute-in-memory technology.
Last I heard they were hoping to bring their first chip (an analogue in-memory digital AI accelerator) to market at the end of this year.
I noticed that Airbus Ventures are listed as backers for Rain AI and I asked ChatGPT what the relationship between Airbus Ventures and Airbus is (see below).
Also, another connection is that our Chairman Mr Antonio Viana is also currently serving on the Board of Directors at Arteris. Arteris and Rain AI are collaborating to develop advanced hardware solutions aimed at enhancing artificial intelligence computing. Rain AI is leveraging Arteris' FlexNoC 5 network-on-chip (NoC) technology.
I wonder if @Diogenese might have an opinion on whether there could be a possibility that BrainChip's and Rain AI's technologies might be complementary, or whether our technology might be able to implemented into theirs in some way for better efficiency and performance outcomes?
View attachment 73525
View attachment 73526
View attachment 73527
Always positive my friend… if you’re negativ on something, stop it, change it, move on, or let it be.
I wouldn’t give you a life advice for freeWith all due respect, I don't need life advice from you.