BRN Discussion Ongoing

Do elephants need hearing aids, or do they just listen to trunk calls?
Now you're showing your agešŸ¤—
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users

TopCat

Regular
  • Fire
Reactions: 1 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Now you're showing your agešŸ¤—
Yes - I've had to explain it to a couple of millennials.

You know - you have to give them THE talk ...

"Once upon a time, when the world was still black and white, there was no internet and mobile phones did not exist ..."
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users
So my thinking is if we are to get an announcement prior to Christmas it will need to be next week or the following. After that the big companies will well and truly be closing shop for a month or two IMO.
Fingers crossed šŸ¤ž
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

CHIPS

Regular
So my thinking is if we are to get an announcement prior to Christmas it will need to be next week or the following. After that the big companies will well and truly be closing shop for a month or two IMO.
Fingers crossed šŸ¤ž
I don't expect anything to come this year.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
I don't expect anything to come this year.
Mine Xmas present has already arrived in the way of my XRP and know I donā€™t know what do, cash some buy more BRN or let it ride, but I could buy a shit load more BRN šŸ˜‚

1732354949760.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

schuey

Regular
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
If your right then Sean has failed......
Again.

After watching the Qualcomm 2024 investor day presentation on YouTube you would have to wonder why anyone would bet against them and chose a little ole Aussie chip company. Qualcomm have all bases covered. Can Akida slip in there somewhere?
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

CHIPS

Regular
If your right then Sean has failed......

This is too early to judge. Wait until the end of the second quarter of 2025, or at least until the next Annual Meeting ... Sean did not say THIS YEAR, right?!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 4 users

Frangipani

Regular
Today, numerous articles on some of the promising future technologies Mercedes-Benz is exploring were published online, after the carmaker had recently invited journalists to its Future Technologies Lab in Sindelfingen.

And of course - you guessed it - neuromorphic computing was one of them.
(I also find solar coating another interesting concept).

There was also a press release by MB itself:

49621E2E-E14D-4047-B1A7-DC5E8A150813.jpeg




E30D57FE-A3FF-4258-9BD2-A830B006BE3D.jpeg


E3330290-6FCF-4237-9ED1-C88510C09690.jpeg

D5348BF4-805B-41DC-87BC-356A6501A9F4.jpeg




Playmobil-MƤnnchen im Einsatzā€¦ šŸ˜€

243935D1-DFB4-4247-BBBA-8ACEE30BD343.jpeg

3F51A5C0-0180-4DD5-B12C-2D18112F96C2.jpeg




German magazine auto, motor und sport published both an online article and a video on MB & neuromorphic computing earlier today (both in German) that literally confirm what Iā€™ve been suspecting: that Mercedes-Benz is nowhere near to implementing neuromorphic technology at scale into their serial carsā€¦




ā€œDer Weg in die Serie ist noch weit.ā€ - ā€œItā€™s still a long way to serial carsā€.

ā€œBis neuromorphe Chips ihren Weg ins Auto finden, wird es wohl noch einige Jahre dauern.ā€ - ā€œItā€™ll probably take a few years / It looks as if it will still take a few years until neuromorphic chips will find their way into (serial) cars.ā€


FF7DAB90-5B31-4D17-A941-047AAB3EA91D.jpeg





ā€œDiese Technologie steht jedoch noch am Anfang und erfordert umfangreiche Tests und Zertifizierungen, bevor sie in Autos eingesetzt werden kann.ā€

ā€œHowever, this technology is still in its infancy and requires extensive testing and certification before it can be used in cars.ā€

Something similar is said in the video itself around the 5 min mark.


Other articles are behind a paywall, but maybe one of you happens to be a subscriber and could check out whether there are any additional snippets of interest worth sharing?





My guess is that the next Mercedes-Benz LinkedIn post regarding NC will give us some more details about the research collaboration with HKA (Hochschule Karlsruhe) on neuromorphic cameras. Or it might be a post announcing the collaboration between Mercedes and Neurobus that I had spotted on Nov 12 (https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-441454).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 31 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users

FJ-215

Regular
This is too early to judge. Wait until the end of the second quarter of 2025, or at least until the next Annual Meeting ... Sean did not say THIS YEAR, right?!
Hi CHIPS,
Sean is always very careful with his words. This interview with him is worth another look. Does he say 2024 is the year? Does he imply it?
(Edit: Nov 9/2023)

 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 6 users

rgupta

Regular
Again.

After watching the Qualcomm 2024 investor day presentation on YouTube you would have to wonder why anyone would bet against them and chose a little ole Aussie chip company. Qualcomm have all bases covered. Can Akida slip in there somewhere?
I don't know why you want to compare brn with qualcomm.
Qualcomm is a big established player, while brn is a start up for last 12 years. We all know Qualcomm use arm ip for most of their products and they may use brn IP as well. Arm is our technology partner which means our technology may have some benefits with arm technology. Which in other way, may mean Qualcomm may be using us in their future endeavors or may need to use us. Qualcomm is not a competitor of brainchip because we are not even in the picture.
The only way for growth of brn is to sell it's technology to Qualcomm than to compete with qualcomm or any big player.
Dyor
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 12 users
I don't know why you want to compare brn with qualcomm.
Qualcomm is a big established player, while brn is a start up for last 12 years. We all know Qualcomm use arm ip for most of their products and they may use brn IP as well. Arm is our technology partner which means our technology may have some benefits with arm technology. Which in other way, may mean Qualcomm may be using us in their future endeavors or may need to use us. Qualcomm is not a competitor of brainchip because we are not even in the picture.
The only way for growth of brn is to sell it's technology to Qualcomm than to compete with qualcomm or any big player.
Dyor
So you have watched the Qualcomm investor presentation then šŸ˜µā€šŸ’«
 

rgupta

Regular
So you have watched the Qualcomm investor presentation then šŸ˜µā€šŸ’«
I am neither invested in Qualcomm, nor have a motivation to invest in them in near future, so no I did not see their presentation.
I am invested in brainchip and want follow the same. And I don't want to compare brn with anyone like apple, Google, Nvidia, Qualcomm, arm etc . They are all established players and world leaders while we have to start getting our 1st cent of royalty.
To me brainchip have a technology and have a future for their technology. Will they compete with existing players or go with existing players only our company statements can tell the same.
Qualcomm is a very good company around 400 times bigger than brn, around 10000 times revenue than brainchip, but there is no comparison here. Once we start getting into main stream and one of Qualcomm or their competitor will start using our IP only then I would like to compare. Unneccessary comparing can either be a hype or doom for brainchip. Yes I want team brainchip should sell their IP to Qualcomm but that is work for team brainchip, I cannot do much about that.
Dyor
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users

7fĆ¼r7

Top 20
Mine Xmas present has already arrived in the way of my XRP and know I donā€™t know what do, cash some buy more BRN or let it ride, but I could buy a shit load more BRN šŸ˜‚

View attachment 73218
Same here but Iā€™ll just let it run. I donā€™t see the point in exchanging a currency that might later be worth more than other currencies for a cheaper one. I think if everything goes well, some people will be glad they held on to it. Just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

manny100

Regular
I don't know why you want to compare brn with qualcomm.
Qualcomm is a big established player, while brn is a start up for last 12 years. We all know Qualcomm use arm ip for most of their products and they may use brn IP as well. Arm is our technology partner which means our technology may have some benefits with arm technology. Which in other way, may mean Qualcomm may be using us in their future endeavors or may need to use us. Qualcomm is not a competitor of brainchip because we are not even in the picture.
The only way for growth of brn is to sell it's technology to Qualcomm than to compete with qualcomm or any big player.
Dyor
One of our partners Prophesee is a supplier to Qualcomm.
We make Prophesee products smarter.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

manny100

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 11 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its bicepsšŸ’Ŗ!
One of our partners Prophesee is a supplier to Qualcomm.
We make Prophesee products smarter.


That's a great point @manny100.

It might be a simplistic way of looking at things, but for me it boils down to two particular areas:
  • performance and efficiency calculated by TOPS/watt, and
  • the unique processing capabilities that BrainChip's technology can bring to the table
If BrainChip's technology can deliver on both of these areas in a meaningful way, then there should be no reason for Qualcomm not to want to integrate it into their products. As has been mentioned numerous times, we are trying to position ourselves as a partner rather than a competitor to behemoths like Qualcomm and NVIDIA.

In terms of determining the TOPS/watt capabilities of Qualcomm's chips, it's a bit tricky because there doesn't seem to be any specified values from the manufacturer on power consumption measurements. In this instance, the authors of one article (published 20 June 2024, linked below) estimated via their own power consumption measurements that "the most efficient power range of the Snapdragon X Elite chips seems to be 20-30 Watts".

AKIDA's Pico on the other hand operates in the microwatt (Ī¼W) to milliwatt (mW) range.

When it comes to the process that BrainChip's technology allows for, we can look to Max Maxfiled's latest article "Taking the Size and Power of Extreme Edge AI/ML to the Extreme Minimum" dated 21 Nov 2024. The obvious benefit is that you can "feed the event-based data from the camera directly to the event-based Akida processor, thereby cutting latency and power consumption to a minimum", as compared to other available techniques.

The big question is whether Qualcomm would see any value in adopting this type technology into their own products and I think that Judd Heape, VP for product management of camera, computer vision and video at Qualcomm Technologies, might have actually answered that question in an EE Times article dated 22 March 2023 when he stated the following.


EXTRACT - EE Times article dated 22 March 2023 (Interview with Judd Heape, VP for product management of camera, computer vision and video at Qualcomm Technologies).

Screenshot 2024-11-24 at 1.51.53 pm.png






EXTRACT - Notebook Check 20 June 2024
Screenshot 2024-11-24 at 1.21.10 pm.png



EXTRACT - Notebook Check 20 June 2024
TOPS  pm.png



EXTRACT - EE Journal"Taking the Size and Power of Extreme Edge AI/ML to the Extreme Minimum" 21 Nov 2024.
Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 10.24.31 am (1).png



Links
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 25 users

rgupta

Regular
That's a great point @manny100.

It might be a simplistic way of looking at things, but for me it boils down to two particular areas:
  • performance and efficiency calculated by TOPS/watt, and
  • the unique processing capabilities that BrainChip's technology can bring to the table
If BrainChip's technology can deliver on both of these areas in a meaningful way, then there should be no reason for Qualcomm not to want to integrate it into their products. As has been mentioned numerous times, we are trying to position ourselves as a partner rather than a competitor to behemoths like Qualcomm and NVIDIA.

In terms of determining the TOPS/watt capabilities of Qualcomm's chips, it's a bit tricky because there doesn't seem to be any specified values from the manufacturer on power consumption measurements. In this instance, the authors of one article (published 20 June 2024, linked below) estimated via their own power consumption measurements that "the most efficient power range of the Snapdragon X Elite chips seems to be 20-30 Watts".

AKIDA's Pico on the other hand operates in the microwatt (Ī¼W) to milliwatt (mW) range.

When it comes to the process that BrainChip's technology allows for, we can look to Max Maxfiled's latest article "Taking the Size and Power of Extreme Edge AI/ML to the Extreme Minimum" dated 21 Nov 2024. The obvious benefit is that you can "feed the event-based data from the camera directly to the event-based Akida processor, thereby cutting latency and power consumption to a minimum", as compared to other available techniques.

The big question is whether Qualcomm would see any value in adopting this type technology into their own products and I think that Judd Heape, VP for product management of camera, computer vision and video at Qualcomm Technologies, might have actually answered that question in an EE Times article dated 22 March 2023 when he stated the following.


EXTRACT - EE Times article dated 22 March 2023 (Interview with Judd Heape, VP for product management of camera, computer vision and video at Qualcomm Technologies).

View attachment 73247





EXTRACT - Notebook Check 20 June 2024
View attachment 73241


EXTRACT - Notebook Check 20 June 2024
View attachment 73244


EXTRACT - EE Journal"Taking the Size and Power of Extreme Edge AI/ML to the Extreme Minimum" 21 Nov 2024.
View attachment 73246


Links
You are right Bravo we need not compete with tech behemoths.
A matter of fact no one can hide the sun. So if our solutions are better than others that will mean we are going to get our share sooner or later.
Event based processing sensors are new for the market place and similarly event based processor no one thought about a few years ago.
So let us see where we are heading to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Top Bottom