DingoBorat
Slim
When we may secure an IP deal for them, wasn't the subject of my post.https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-433475
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-433479
Hi @DingoBorat and @Diogenese
AGM May 2024 -
Tony Lewis: well so TENNs is a competitor against, existing neural networks, our customers have a view of the world that is pre TENNs they have to be introduced to the technology and they're being introduced in a stage manner we're going out we're talking about TENNs we're publishing papers we're getting people familiarised I believe that once they're familiarised with TENNs they're going to see that we can use it for all sorts of things so we're proving out how we can use it for audio de-noising as you saw there but also ASR is on our agenda, processing biomedical samples that's on our agenda and also these large language models and so we're proving out what we can do with TENNs and once we have those proof points we can go to customers and say hey guys this is going to be you should go with TENNs because it's going to be a lot more power efficient than what you're using right now it's going to be good for you eat your vegetables and you know learn about our technology.
Sean: before the next question comes a couple of themes that came out if you heard my speech, we were going to put more resources into TENNs so more development.
Tony’s comments from just three months ago, along with the recent CR, SPP, and investor presentation from two weeks ago, make it hard for me to believe that we’ll be waking up to a trading halt involving the sale of TENNs IP or software anytime soon.
I like the team's efforts in building TENN's profile through articles, white paper, etc and by ensuring that there are multiple demos, models and possibly even simulation environments are ready before moving towards commercialisation. These lessons have clearly been learned from the experience with AKIDA when introducing a brand-new technology.
It was the fact, that you were wrong, about AKIDA 2.0 TENNS IP, TENNS software and TENNS Pleaides software, not being part of BrainChip's current IP portfolio, correct?
Which you confidently stated as fact.
Saying you don't see an IP deal for them anytime soon, is your opinion and is neither right nor wrong and you are of course, free to have.
Saying something is not a product, when it is and wrongly stating that it's because it's still in development, is not an opinion, as you are stating it as a fact, which is not okay.
Last edited: