wilzy123
Founding Member
This is precisely what it will be doing up there.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
This is precisely what it will be doing up there.
BrainShit
Regular
We're down over 28% today and I haven't been able to go to bed yet. It's so nice to see you green, somehow you get so excited from day to day and we were already so far down. I hope I wake up tomorrow and it's a green day.
Greetings from your Bavarian girl, have a good day.
Attachments
SharesForBrekky
Regular
OMG, that is enormous if he said that!
Jumpchooks
Regular
Could not help myself, although I didn't get them at 30 cents, I am still happy.
And just for people that think I am full of sh#t, this is what I have brought in
the last month, ( Ok I am in debt ) but just showing because this is how much.
confidence I have in the Company and I am ready to buy more if the opportunity
arises.
As I said before, it is going to make me or break me, only time will tell.
View attachment 58033
Frangipani
Top 20
I totally missed the Technion Institute by being bedazzled with Cornell Tech.
Did everyone else notice?
View attachment 58068
View attachment 58071
Cornell Tech Joins BrainChip University AI Accelerator Program | Steve Thorne
Welcome to the club, Cornell Tech! We look forward to working with our friends from Cornell University and the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.www.linkedin.com
Good morning from Germany, Terroni,
yes. I hadn’t spotted Steve Thorne’s comment, yet, but I had had a look at the Cornell Tech website before going to sleep last night and discovered there is an institute within Cornell Tech that is a joint academic venture between Cornell University and the Technion: the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute.
Cornell Tech - Who We Are
They offer a number of two-year dual degree master programmes, of which I found this one particularly intriguing, as the technical topics are all right up our alley:
Jacobs Technion-Cornell Dual MS Degrees - Health Tech
This degree from the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute combines the rigor of an Ivy League degree with an innovation lab approach to health tech projects.
Other dual Master programmes interesting for us:
Last edited:
Smoothsailing
Regular
He is a Brilliant addition to the BRN team and has great communication skills. I am very pleased indeed with Sean choice’s of all these quality people that are now apart of Brainchip which will enable us access to highest levels of success.
Last edited:
Jumpchooks
Regular
Hi sb182, I understand hoe you feel right now. Have been trying to average down and collect bargains.
GLTAH
GLTAH
DingoBorat
Slim
Ahh yeah, I was having a brief look at the share quantities, which is misleading on Comsec, when I should have been looking at the cash values..
Some great posts coming through !
Couple of things that I forgot to mention yesterday, Sean mentioned twice I think from memory, we aren't a chip company and he
carefully linked that to, "no we aren't taping out AKD 2.0" I apologize upfront if that quote is slightly wrong, but it was linked to the
fact that, we are 100% focused on being an IP provider...the reason that I mention that is the fact that Todd did say recently at CES that
we are currently I think taping out AKD 2.0...at the time yesterday I did think to myself, there is a slight disconnect in what Todd said and
what Sean stated...very happy to be corrected by someone who heard that differently to me.
When a question was also asked about an update on AKD 3.0 I think that Sean also indicated that it may not follow that path of AKD 3
AKD 4 etc...similar to what Peter explained to me via email, and no, I haven't had the time to go searching the 100's of emails I receive
from all corners of the globe just yet, I'm too busy being retired
Planning on contacting Peter soon, asking what he views as the biggest differentiators between Native Spiking Neural Networks and what we are currently focused on with customers, hopefully he will share his wisdom with me/us on this topic, stay tuned.
Finally, yesterday some people would have made some serious money forcing our share price south, but a little correction is fine, as today just
showed the actions of manipulation are still alive and well, interesting in the short term, but in my view our company will deliver in the long run,
so stay strong and try not to let anyone break your spirit, Brainchip's a winner ALREADY.
Regards....Tech
Couple of things that I forgot to mention yesterday, Sean mentioned twice I think from memory, we aren't a chip company and he
carefully linked that to, "no we aren't taping out AKD 2.0" I apologize upfront if that quote is slightly wrong, but it was linked to the
fact that, we are 100% focused on being an IP provider...the reason that I mention that is the fact that Todd did say recently at CES that
we are currently I think taping out AKD 2.0...at the time yesterday I did think to myself, there is a slight disconnect in what Todd said and
what Sean stated...very happy to be corrected by someone who heard that differently to me.
When a question was also asked about an update on AKD 3.0 I think that Sean also indicated that it may not follow that path of AKD 3
AKD 4 etc...similar to what Peter explained to me via email, and no, I haven't had the time to go searching the 100's of emails I receive
from all corners of the globe just yet, I'm too busy being retired
Planning on contacting Peter soon, asking what he views as the biggest differentiators between Native Spiking Neural Networks and what we are currently focused on with customers, hopefully he will share his wisdom with me/us on this topic, stay tuned.
Finally, yesterday some people would have made some serious money forcing our share price south, but a little correction is fine, as today just
showed the actions of manipulation are still alive and well, interesting in the short term, but in my view our company will deliver in the long run,
so stay strong and try not to let anyone break your spirit, Brainchip's a winner ALREADY.
Regards....Tech
Can we play the sp backwards to $2.35?Wait.....still listening.
Sure I just heard....Paul is dead
Space Cadet
Regular
. I am glad I bought some more at 0,19 EUR yesterday.Frank Zappa
Regular
Maybe he has family here
cassip
Regular
Hello Esq.
volume of the Fonds is 15 Million Euro. That means 7,09 % (fully invested, they can keep up to 50% cash) equals 1.063.500 Euro, with SP of 0,20 Euro these are 5.317.500 shares, with SP of 0,3 it would be 3.545.000 shares.
So no substantial holder (not yet). I assume they would report crossing of a certain threshold. Sub-custodian depositary (is this the right word?) by the way in Autralia is BNP Paribas Securities Services.
Regards
Cassip
P.S.: you can see it at the "Monatsultimo Factsheet" on the right side "Fondsvolumen in Mio EUR"
Unsere Fonds - Frankfurter Vermögen AG
Last edited:
7für7
Top 20
This is an assessment from our chart technicians in the German forum, can anyone here confirm this? Can you work with charts at Brainchip or does that not carry weight? Thank you in advance.
"Good morning everyone. As long as we don't break the last high at 0.535, I see it similarly to Melle, that the current counter-movement is only the B wave and after completion the C wave will follow. If the C wave starts from the small top tonight at 0.405, the target of the C wave would be around 0.235, which also roughly corresponds to the 78.6% retracement of the last rise, which would still be a healthy correction. However, what bothers me about this target is that it is below the MA200 in the Daily and also below the MA50 in the weekly, which is less favorable. Alternatively, the current correction low of 0.315 has already reached a healthy target level and has also reacted positively to it, so it could continue to rise directly. The moving averages in the RSI on a 4-hour basis and on a daily basis, however, show bearish tendencies, with room for improvement in the weekly. It's best to keep an eye on the two levels 0.315 and 0.535. A break of one of the levels will determine the further short-term direction."
"Good morning everyone. As long as we don't break the last high at 0.535, I see it similarly to Melle, that the current counter-movement is only the B wave and after completion the C wave will follow. If the C wave starts from the small top tonight at 0.405, the target of the C wave would be around 0.235, which also roughly corresponds to the 78.6% retracement of the last rise, which would still be a healthy correction. However, what bothers me about this target is that it is below the MA200 in the Daily and also below the MA50 in the weekly, which is less favorable. Alternatively, the current correction low of 0.315 has already reached a healthy target level and has also reacted positively to it, so it could continue to rise directly. The moving averages in the RSI on a 4-hour basis and on a daily basis, however, show bearish tendencies, with room for improvement in the weekly. It's best to keep an eye on the two levels 0.315 and 0.535. A break of one of the levels will determine the further short-term direction."
Good Morning Cassip ,
Thankyou kindly for the clarification.
Hard to make out what thay are upto when one dose not savvy the lingo.
Regards,
Esq.
Pom down under
Top 20
No one knows how to predict BRN, so I’d take his comments with a pinch, but to me it seems extremely weird and why do you post this?
rgupta
Regular
I assume you have to read it the other way around. Buyer is asking seller to sell @36 cents coz the price is 37.5 cents. If someone is selling at 36 cents then how the actual price is 37.5 centsI think the 1.16 million sell order at 36 cents in the closing auction is fudge..
Aimed at pushing a lower close..
View attachment 58062
But whatever..
36 cent is a bid price if someone wants to sell there
DingoBorat
Slim
No I read it right..
"Seller" had at 36 cents, because they wanted to be near the front of the queue to sell (or it was manipulative sell pressure).
Not sure if anyone can tell, or saw if that order went through?
The indicative price, was because people were doing the opposite, on the buy side (putting a higher price, up to 41.5 cents, to ensure getting their shares).
Neither the buyers, nor sellers, wanted to pay or receive the figures shown.
Similar threads
