BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Tothemoon24]

​

​

New UN regulation paves the way for the roll-out of additional driver assistance systems​

Autonomous DrivingVehicle RegulationsRoad Safety
Sustainable DevelopmentTransport

01 February 2024

UNECE’s Working Party on Automated/Autonomous and Connected Vehicles has adopted the draft of a new regulation that defines provisions for the approval of vehicles with Driver Control Assistance Systems (DCAS) and provides minimum safety requirements for vehicles equipped with the Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), such as lane keep assist.
DCAS are a subset of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). While active, DCAS are able to stabilize or manoeuvre the vehicle.
The new regulation builds on UN Regulation No. 79adopted in 2018 and covers a broader range of technologies to be introduced in new models. For instance, the new regulation will no longer limit the use of lane changing systems to motorways (roads with 2 lanes and a physical separation from traffic in the opposite direction) but will extend it to other types of roads.
The new regulation aims to allow the approval of a combination of driving control assistance features, including assistance to braking, accelerating, and overtaking.
However, the new regulation does not cover full driving automation, and therefore requires manufacturers to implement strategies to ensure that drivers have appropriate knowledge of the capabilities of assistance systems and do not overestimate them (mode awareness).
To avoid driver overreliance on such systems, the regulation stipulates that DCAS shall be designed to ensure that the driver remains engaged with the driving task. The driver’s hands must remain on the wheel and the system shall monitor the driver’s visual engagement with the road, triggering alarms after 5 seconds when it detects that this is no longer the case.
The regulation also stipulates that manufacturers will be required to submit an outline of the systems’ design to type approval authorities. The validation of DCAS shall ensure that a thorough assessment, considering the functional and operational safety of the features integrated in DCAS and the entire DCAS integrated into a vehicle, is performed by the manufacturer during the design and development processes.
The regulation will require manufacturers to monitor the performance of these systems once on the roads and provide periodic (at least once a year) and ad-hoc reports on critical safety occurrences to the authority that approved the vehicle.
The new regulation will be submitted to the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) for adoption in June 2024, with an entry into force foreseen in January 2025.

 

[cosors]

Let all shorters burn and give control back to healthy money-making and growth.

Until now... Wait and see the coming days: Arm’s stock surge burns short sellers, to the tune of $445 million in paper losses

until now here:

 

[Esq.111]

Morning Charles2 ,

Thay are having a good run indeed .

Beamr Imaging Ltd (BMR) Stock Price & News - Google Finance

Get the latest Beamr Imaging Ltd (BMR) real-time quote, historical performance, charts, and other financial information to help you make more informed trading and investment decisions.

g.co

Regards,
Esq

 

[cosors]

Once apon a time the AFR was a trusted paper..

I find the statement absurd that someone sets a threshold and only above this is a company entitled to be included in the 200 if it still has a low turnover. And this absurdly completely ignores the position the company occupies or the patents it holds.
To illustrate my thought, imagine ARM were to spin off all its patents into a new company and go public on the ASX. The 200 would be denied until some other defined threshold for reasonable turnover is exceeded?! Absurd that is.

 

[DingoBorat]

Let all shorters burn and give control back to healthy money-making and growth.
View attachment 56674

until now here:
View attachment 56675

That's what I'm talking about baby!

Some decent volume, on the German exchanges!

 

[cosors]

That's what I'm talking about baby!

Some decent volume, on the German exchanges!


View attachment 56678

I know, I know. Probably ridiculous for you and a ⅒th (?) of your volume. But that's neat here. It was almost dusty here on the exchanges. All the exchanges need to be added up...

 

[Esq.111]

Chippers ,

Shaping up very nicely for today ,

Start the day with a bang....



Regards,
Esq.

 

[DingoBorat]

I find the statement absurd that someone sets a threshold and only above this is a company entitled to be included in the 200 if it still has a low turnover. And this absurdly completely ignores the position the company occupies or the patents it holds.
To illustrate my thought, imagine ARM were to spin off all its patents into a new company and go public on the ASX. The 200 would be denied until some other defined threshold for reasonable turnover is exceeded?! Absurd that is.

I have to disagree with you here Corsors.

As FactFinder said..
"Shorting should be banned fullstop but at the very least pre revenue companies should be protected"

Pre-revenue companies, have a "natural" protection from shorters, if not included in the ASX300 or ASX200, because the shares to lend to them, are just not available in large quantities.

This is the Time and opportunity, for them, to raise funds, while they are still pre-revenue.

If their market capitalisation, forces them into the Big Boys Club (ASX300/200) this period of protection disappears and it's open slather, for the wolves to prey on the young "defenseless" lambs..

The author's original "complaint" was about the "quality" of the index, but I can see, how a young company, would want to avoid inclusion, until it was "ready" had building revenue and was profitable.

Just my opinions and happy to differ..

 

[cosors]

I have to disagree with you here Corsors.

As FactFinder said..
"Shorting should be banned fullstop but at the very least pre revenue companies should be protected"

Pre-revenue companies, have a "natural" protection from shorters, if not included in the ASX300 or ASX200, because the shares to lend to them, are just not available in large quantities.

This is the Time and opportunity, for them, to raise funds, while they are still pre-revenue.

If their market capitalisation, forces them into the Big Boys Club (ASX300/200) this period of protection disappears and it's open slather, for the wolves to prey on the young "defenseless" lambs..

The author's original "complaint" was about the "quality" of the index, but I can see, how a young company, would want to avoid inclusion, until it was "ready" had building revenue and was profitable.

Just my opinions and happy to differ..

I was able to understand the article at from the beginning I think. And I have no problem with divergent opinions at all! It makes things clearer. I'm concerned with these two threshold values that need to be defined. And that raises the question and doubt in my mind - who sets them and by what standard/interest? In my view, the value of a company is not defined solely by turnover.
Quite apart from the fact that too little is said about profit.
So this exclusive club should only be for companies that fulfil these two thresholds, thus further cementing the model of this exclusive society?
I fully agree that it was too early for BRN. However, this is not because of the value that lies dormant in this company, but because of the existing system. I was very surprised that Brainchip was repeatedly denied an exit. My naive thought, and I really don't know much about such things, is why BRN wasn't downgraded when it was the time to.)

___
I simply don't trust this system and don't think it is conducive to healthy growth. Investment in the future is not just debt. A discussion that is very topical here in Germany in these days.

___
Regarding the second threshold: no turnover? That was and is not correct. Bad journalism. So how much turnover is appropriate for the 200. Maybe that explains one of my concerns.

 

[Pom down under]

Chippers ,

Shaping up very nicely for today ,

Start the day with a bang....



Regards,
Esq.

 

[cosors]

off topic
I have a question. When do I say figure and when do I say number? Where is the difference in detail?
Regards
cosors

 

[Esq.111]

Cosors ,

I'm not flash with English , but this may help...


The young punk had pulled this stunt a number of times with great success, though had not figured on having a larger impliment drawn upon himself , and hence thought his number was up.



.

Regards,
Esq.

 

[cosors]

Cosors ,

I'm not flash with English , but this may help...


The young punk had pulled this stunt a number of times with great success, though had not figured on having a larger impliment drawn upon himself , and hence thought his number was up.



.

Regards,
Esq.

 

[cosors]

Ok
Is this a number or a figure
11.11?
Please not it's both true.
figure number figure number figure number

 

[BrainShit]

Ok
Is this a number or a figure
11.11?
Please not it's both true.
figure number figure number figure number

1. A number can have one or more digits (1...0)
2. A figure can be a shape, a diagram, or a number; if used to describe a number, it can be composed of a single digit or of multiple digits.

Note that both number and figure can refer to a numerical value. Number is the proper word to use when referring to a mathematical value, while figure is commonly used when referring to a written or printed representation of a number.

e.g. $100.000 as sales figures
e.g. Dim intA(2) AS Integer (number)
e.g. Spock as figure
.
.
u'll figure it out.

 

[charles2]

What a difference a day makes:

BMR to collaborate with NVDA....up 981%

Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR)​

NasdaqCM - NasdaqCM Real Time Price. Currency in USD
Follow

22.82+20.71(+981.41%)
As of 11:18AM EST. Market open.

• Summary
• Chart
• Conversations
• Statistics
• Historical Data
• Profile
• Financials
• Analysis
• Options
• Holders
• Sustainability
• 1D
• 5D
• 1M
• 6M
• YTD
• 1Y
• 5Y
• Max

Full screen

Trade prices are not sourced from all markets

Previous Close	2.11
Open	6.07
Bid	17.64 x 1800
Ask	17.71 x 2200
Day's Range	6.06 - 23.00
52 Week Range	0.91 - 23.00
Volume	94,298,406
Avg. Volume	148,767

Market Cap	294.567M
Beta (5Y Monthly)	N/A
PE Ratio (TTM)	N/A
EPS (TTM)	-0.10
Earnings Date	N/A
Forward Dividend & Yield	N/A (N/A)
Ex-Dividend Date	N/A
1y Target Est	5.00

MAYBE TIME TO COLLABORATE?

Something seems amiss here....probably my thinking.... thinking out loud.

If NVDA announced through the newswires that they were collaborating with Brainchip.....BRN would spike to $10 and the ASX could pound sand.

If Brainchip announced to the ASX they we were collaborating with NVDA what would happen. A speeding ticket, a fine, a threat to delist, an investigation, a Motley Fool article, a trading halt for days, or would it be just business as usual......and yes of course the stock price would explode.

So imagine we are collaborating with NVDA, honoring the NDA is suppressing the share-price by magnitudes.

Now consider this, the BMR/NVDA announcement is not a buy out offer but a statement of fact.

 

[cosors]

1. A number can have one or more digits (1...0)
2. A figure can be a shape, a diagram, or a number; if used to describe a number, it can be composed of a single digit or of multiple digits.

Note that both number and figure can refer to a numerical value. Number is the proper word to use when referring to a mathematical value, while figure is commonly used when referring to a written or printed representation of a number.

e.g. $100.000 as sales figures
e.g. Dim intA(2) AS Integer (number)
e.g. Spok as figure
.
.
u'll figure it out.

Thank you so much!! I understand that. For the first time answered and understood this at the same time. A dream!

 

[cosors]

Thank you so much!! I understand that. For the first time answered and understood this at the same time. A dream!

perfect explanation
Love it!
Just a moment

BRN Discussion Ongoing

Those 2 lines look tasty

thestockexchange.com.au

 

[Sirod69]

perfect explanation
Love it!
Just a moment
View attachment 56680

BRN Discussion Ongoing

Those 2 lines look tasty

thestockexchange.com.au

View attachment 56681

I don't understand now Kölle Bub, what's with the number, are the nerds here? And who emerged?
Do you write to yourself? Can I help? Everything all right with you?

 

[TECH]

I hope that all individuals, brokers or fund managers enjoy the themes embedded within these two song lyrics....Burn baby Burn.

10 months and counting down !