D
Deleted member 118
Guest
Lol
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
M_C
Founding Member
BaconLover
Founding Member
Some of the companies are in various funds. Brainchip would be eligible for her Robotics fund, Space, Autonomous Tech, Innovation ETFs etc.
Rskiff
Regular
BaconLover this is a different kind of fund to the others by the way it is structured, worth a watch.
AARONASX
Holding onto what I've got
I haven't seen any links between Brainchip and Examin Holdings, but in saying that no one saw Mercedes come out last month. that was left-field so anything is possible.
There is a lot that Akida can do they've mentioned
Thanks for sharing!
IndepthDiver
Regular
Just to clarify Biotome was given a $225,000 research grant by the WA government if you read the original grant funding documentation. The $20k grant value is incorrect IMO (see bottom entry on table below).
Future Health Research and Innovation Fund - FHRI Focus Grants - COVID-19
Media statement announcing a COVID-19-related research, innovation and infrastructure funding recipients
Secondly, the $650k grant appears to be a federal one. The federal government is bigger than State so typically these are higher value. Biotome has only received a State grant but there is always the possibility of receiving a federal one in the future.
Thirdly, the time frame for getting results back by this device is significantly longer than is the case for Nanose. The below article indicates 60 seconds.
Fourthly, it's not clear if the analysis is being done on the device itself. Given it takes 60 seconds to get a QR code result back, this either means:
-it's being sent off to the cloud for analysis, OR
-it's being analysed very slowly on the device.
Lastly, there's no indication of power consumption. Assuming it's battery operated, how long will it last till needing to be charged?
From memory the Nanose device can return results back in the order of ~3 seconds. An additional 30 seconds is required to use gas to purge the device. This is very different to waiting 60 seconds for a QR code. Nanose also doesn't need an internet connection so can be operated anywhere at any time as it is self-sufficient. We also know an Akida chip can run at maximum capacity on a AAA battery for 6 months, which indicates a Nanose device powered by Akida would be able to last this long as well. If this Queensland device isn't powered by Akida, and if it potentially using most of it's power to send data back and forth to the internet it will not last that long.
In short, Nanose is a significantly superior device.
Queenslander Colin Hickey, 71, invented the Examin testing gadget, which boasts 98 per cent accuracy and returns a test consequence after simply 60 seconds, by way of a QR code.
Tuliptrader
Regular
I have just finished watching Sean Hehir presentation for the virtual investor conference.
To be honest I was really quite impressed with his performance.
His address was relaxed and affable, but still informative. Since it was primarily for investors I think he managed to strike an excellent balance between the technology we have produced and the desire the present and future customers will have for our product moving forward. He also continuously reinforced our uniqueness and advantages we currently maintain over our competitors. Trying to put myself in the shoes of an investor hearing this information for the first time I think I would have walked away with a pretty reasonable grasp of Brainchip as an investment. My ears would have definitely pricked up at the Mercedes mention.
As factfinder has previously spoken of, Sean left no doubt at all as to Mercedes being a customer.
Definitely worth a look.
TT
To be honest I was really quite impressed with his performance.
His address was relaxed and affable, but still informative. Since it was primarily for investors I think he managed to strike an excellent balance between the technology we have produced and the desire the present and future customers will have for our product moving forward. He also continuously reinforced our uniqueness and advantages we currently maintain over our competitors. Trying to put myself in the shoes of an investor hearing this information for the first time I think I would have walked away with a pretty reasonable grasp of Brainchip as an investment. My ears would have definitely pricked up at the Mercedes mention.
As factfinder has previously spoken of, Sean left no doubt at all as to Mercedes being a customer.
Definitely worth a look.
TT
mrgds
Regular
"For jerk free discussion head to stockexchange.com.au " ---------- LUV ITJust a little upgrade on my HC signatureView attachment 181
Now, surely with "ManChildreborn" you can admit to preferencing the Tesla Gen 2 Roadster , over that antiquated Audi bucket.
AARONASX
Holding onto what I've got
There might not be a cloud needed for this device per se, I think the QR code might be used to spit out data to a larger screen ie a mobile device which we all have, this would give the device compatibility for the users. Think of it like a code on a cars-tyre, or a batch No. you can put a lot of information in QR codes. If they are going to put everything on the device's screen then you will need a larger screen, larger device, more power, etc.Just to clarify Biotome was given a $225,000 research grant by the WA government if you read the original grant funding documentation. The $20k grant value is incorrect IMO (see bottom entry on table below).
View attachment 182Future Health Research and Innovation Fund - FHRI Focus Grants - COVID-19
Media statement announcing a COVID-19-related research, innovation and infrastructure funding recipientsfhrifund.health.wa.gov.au
Secondly, the $650k grant appears to be a federal one. The federal government is bigger than State so typically these are higher value. Biotome has only received a State grant but there is always the possibility of receiving a federal one in the future.
Thirdly, the time frame for getting results back by this device is significantly longer than is the case for Nanose. The below article indicates 60 seconds.
Fourthly, it's not clear if the analysis is being done on the device itself. Given it takes 60 seconds to get a QR code result back, this either means:
-it's being sent off to the cloud for analysis, OR
-it's being analysed very slowly on the device.
Lastly, there's no indication of power consumption. Assuming it's battery operated, how long will it last till needing to be charged?
From memory the Nanose device can return results back in the order of ~3 seconds. An additional 30 seconds is required to use gas to purge the device. This is very different to waiting 60 seconds for a QR code. Nanose also doesn't need an internet connection so can be operated anywhere at any time as it is self-sufficient. We also know an Akida chip can run at maximum capacity on a AAA battery for 6 months, which indicates a Nanose device powered by Akida would be able to last this long as well. If this Queensland device isn't powered by Akida, and if it potentially using most of it's power to send data back and forth to the internet it will not last that long.
In short, Nanose is a significantly superior device.
Queenslander Colin Hickey, 71, invented the Examin testing gadget, which boasts 98 per cent accuracy and returns a test consequence after simply 60 seconds, by way of a QR code.
so maybe just slow
What would benefit these guys is using a screen with the technology called E-paper: very low power and stays on indefinitely once changed
M_C
Founding Member
I think you mean Alfa Romeo QUADRAfoglio lol ...............I have my eyes on an Maserati MC20 now actually"For jerk free discussion head to stockexchange.com.au " ---------- LUV IT
Now, surely with "ManChildreborn" you can admit to preferencing the Tesla Gen 2 Roadster , over that antiquated Audi bucket.
D
Deleted member 118
Guest
M_C
Founding Member
I think you mean Alfa Romeo QUADRAfoglio lol ...............I have my eyes on an Maserati MC20 now actually
Tothemoon24
Top 20
Wow MC
That isn’t a car that’s a leg opener !
Similar threads
