FUD is rife both here and hotcrapper.
Make no mistake, those that are promoting the idea of a second strike are doing so with dishonest intentions.
We are not even half way to the next AGM. There is a significant amount of water to flow under the bridge between now and then. It is a premature scare tactic and nothing more for those that are promoting it to either accumulate more shares at a cheap price or to make money on a short position as the price declines.
In addition to that, anyone that thinks a second strike is a good idea has holes in their head. All the work that has been done to date, all of the relationships that have been built, they are at a people level. If the board spills and some of our key directors are not re-elected then we lose
significant progress in that regard.
The entire re-election process would also be a massive distraction and a costly process. It is a 90-day process that would limit directors time in areas of the business that actually matter. We need our directors focused with two hands on the wheel. Not worrying about a fucking board spill.
@Xray1 is a user to watch out for. There are many more but I will leave that for you to make your own opinion on.
The only person I don't want to see re-elected at the next AGM is Pia. Loan, Antonio etc all come with significant semi-conductor industry experience and expertise. They've been there and have done it and consequently have great networks to leverage. Pia has none of that. Pia has very good board level experience and would be suitable for other listed companies, but not Brainchip. I am also annoyed by the fact she heavily promotes events, groups and other ideas on her LinkedIn, but never Brainchip, yet she is paid a significant sum for her seat at the table. Perhaps she does a lot behind the scenes. In that case the company needs to do a better job in showing the value added.