BRN Discussion Ongoing

Xray1

Regular
From the last Quarterly report it was stated therein that:

"The Company is currently experiencing its highest ever level of commercial engagements, the volume and quality of which are improving rapidly as a larger number of customers learn about BrainChip and our 2nd Generation technology which will be available in late Q3."

I do hope that the second generation Akida 2E, 2S & 2P does come out at the end of this quarter as stated by the Co as above that being the 30 September 2023... ( that being only some 6 weeks away ) ... imo, any delay in the delivery of the Akida Generation 2 will only further exaggerate negative s/holder sentiment, cause the s/price to fall further and more importantly put further doubt as to management's ability to provide creditability to the statements that they may make and time lines.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

wilzy123

Founding Member
Yes I think its a function of poorly performing share price. With an 85% reduction in share price off ATH's, with no visible non-Megachips IP signings, there's less the company can talk about that will satisfy shareholders. By its very nature, you'll be getting forward-looking guidance without confirmation.

When a company valuation is suffering, shareholders tend to go to the narrative or fundamentals and newsflow to try to find something to hold onto to justify their position. Getting more information and communication isn't going to make the share price better. It just simply a way of trying to psychologically justify a poor investment to yourself.

That's where I see things.. And is why I always manage risk appropriately.
Dear Nigerian Prince.

Please deposit all your deep and meaningful share price posts into this thread (https://thestockexchange.com.au/thr...d-the-fugly-and-general-concern.139152/unread). They will be received well there as opposed to here.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Sad
Reactions: 10 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
From the last Quarterly report it was stated therein that:

"The Company is currently experiencing its highest ever level of commercial engagements, the volume and quality of which are improving rapidly as a larger number of customers learn about BrainChip and our 2nd Generation technology which will be available in late Q3."

I do hope that the second generation Akida 2E, 2S & 2P does come out at the end of this quarter as stated by the Co as above that being the 31st August 2023... ( that being only some 10 days away ) ... imo, any delay in the delivery of the Akida Generation 2 will only further exaggerate negative s/holder sentiment, cause the s/price to fall further and more importantly put further doubt as to management's ability to provide creditability to the statements that they may make and time lines.
Late Q3 is the end of September?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 20 users

Shadow59

Regular
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Foxdog

Regular
[been
Late Q3 is the end of September?
Yay, even more time for the SP to drop 😃👍
 
  • Sad
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

wilzy123

Founding Member
[been
Yay, even more time for the SP to drop 😃👍
200w.gif

Yes
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Hey Damo, defiantly not directed at you - I have zero personal issues with anyone on this forum, most of you I don't know, and those of you who I have met in person are fantastic people. I was simply responding to a post.

I want to respond to your post accurately, so I'm going to break it down by sentence.

In my honest opinion, there is a disconnect between SP and the outlook of the company.

Six months ago and I'd have agreed with you, now, I think we are probably appropriately priced. Every passing day without commercial adoption (and lets be clear - that's all that matters here. Partnerships, podcasts, scientific articles, new hires, Robs likes on LinkedIn all mean nothing if nobody buys our product) diminishes the value of this company (in my opinion of course). AKD1000 has been available for over two years', and call it a test chip if you like (and that another story as this isn't what the company sold it to us as initially), but it was sold to two clients, so obviously there was potential for it to be sold to more - why wasn't it?.. We've seen articles and "evidence" being posted here for the four years' that I've been a shareholder, so why haven't any of the referenced signed a contract? By means of example - We've seen multiple phone and device releases by the big two over that period, so that completely null and voids the argument of development time. We're apparently at the start of an Artificial Intelligence revolution, we have a working chip, ready for sale, better and cheaper than any of the largest semiconductor companies have got, and we cant sell it? It's beginning to feel like there's no appetite for it.

I don't believe we are looking like we are 'done.' If I did, I would have sold.

I actually said that without commercial take up we're done, obviously we have sufficient operating capital for the coming months, but what happens when that runs out? Investors aren't going to keep throwing good money at it without a return. Without being patronising - look at the chart! If it continues on this trajectory for another 18 months without further commercial contracts and revenue then I'll stand by that statement.

There are plenty of companies on the ASX that have peaked and failed, and this is looking very similar right now. Its not good.

I think it would be insanity to believe this company is destined for failure but still hold on. Unless you believe we will be pumped back to a level in which you can exit with most or more than your money in hand? All prior to the apparent inevitable collapse?
TBH there's many people here who would sell out at or around their avg price which is so silly too, but to each their own.


I believe we are at a defining moment in the companies history, and the tires need to touch the tarmac. I've been bullshitted time and time again by company representatives (to my face) telling me that they're extremely positive about the coming months, etc., only to be let down by a fucking partnership or some other insignificant news. Contracts and revenue are needed, and they are needed very soon, but I'm questioning whether we have a team that are up to it, assuming that the chip is as good as its said to be.

I have a significant number of shares. Nobody wants this company to succeed more than I do. I've read and read, and researched and read and have weighed up this investment against others, and this is my current outlook. Its mine, and everyone is entitles to their own. I see high level posters stating with fact that the future is rosy and big things are coming, but (and in response to your question a couple of days ago @Rise from the ashes, this is me calling out the bullshit) they don't know what will happen in the future and they have no guarantees that management turn this company into a success.

To answer your questions about why, I can only trust what management have to say.
Unfortunately I don't know more about Brainchip than them, so I don't believe its prudent to reject their responses.
If we can't trust them when they speak of the position they are in now, why have so many held onto single sentences from Sean regarding watching the financials, or lumpy revenue?

Sean has said a lot of things, as have the rest of them, but the proof is in the pudding and as i mentioned previously, nothing has transpired.

TBH I can see why management is tight-lipped, everyone here expects them to crystal-ball revenue figures and IP contracts and then try to crucify them when they miss.

I don't think that's fair. They need to do better with shareholder engagement and have more transparency. The podcasts tell us nothing, but elude us to believe a future where Akida runs the world, but in reality we're a microcap again, with no real world adoption and a declining SP.

I'm no stranger to making my concerns vocal (and yes, I understand that rubs a lot of you up the wrong way), but I'm a genuine shareholder with genuine concerns that I cant seem to get a proper answer to:

- What is the status of the EAP participants?
- How many companies are Brainchip currently engaged with?
- What is the sector distribution of these engagement?
- How advanced are these engagements?

They aren't hard questions, and don't specifically break any non-disclosure agreements as there is nothing specific in them.

"The share price will do what the share price will do" - This about sums up how few fucks management actually give about company shareholders.

They need to do better.
Hi rob,

I usually don't respond to what might be called would-be Cassandras, but you have taken some time to elucidate your thoughts.

I thought that when I bought in 5 years ago, the SP was about to explode because the company was giving a geeks presentation in the US, and I still believe the SP is about to explode. It's just taken a bit longer, or maybe it's a slow explosion ...

Starting with your 4 questions:

a response to Q1 would be the sort of thing for which the ASX would demand further and better particulars, which would put us in conflict with all the NDAs, a la Ford;

Similarly for Q2;

Q3 is reasonable, but I think this has been answered with the degree of specificity allowable under the NDAs - automotive, health, mechanical maintenance, aerospace, ... . As I said 5 years ago, it would be easier to list the areas where Akida cannot be used (it's a very short list).

Q4, see Q1.

Taking your example of mobile phones, the development cycle is several years, so, while we missed the recent releases and those shortly upcoming, there is nothing to suggest we are not being considered for future releases. Our association with Prophesee gives us a strong link into the process, especially given Synsense's admission of its low level applicability.

Remember BRN is on a steep learning curve. We need to discover what our customers need, and they don't know because they don't know how revolutionary Akida is. Last year we were talking about the recently invented LSTM functionality for "attention", and now we have bypassed that for ViT/TeNNs in Akida 2. This is not to say Akida 1 is obsolete. We have developed Akida 1500, which is Akida 1 el cheapo, or at least stripped of the ARM Cortex processor, available from 2 nodes (8 NPUs ) up to 20 nodes, whether you want an always-on wake-word watching device, a vibration monitor, or a full video processing chip.

The IP licensing business is a long haul project, much longer than selling chips.

You know that Renesas and Megachips are bringing out processors incorporating Akida 1. Renesas has its own in-house DRP-AI but has found applications where Akida is more relevant.
I find it encouraging to remember:

Prophesee loves us;

nViso loves us;

NASA is a fan;

Mercedes is impressed;

Valeo is a partner;

we are compatible with all ARM processors;

SiFive, ARM's up and coming rival, is also a partner;

...

It is true that the company has had a few major business model changes, and this has inevitably shifted expectations. We've been a software company, a chip company, and now an IP licensing company. Software provides only a pale shadow of Akida's capabilities. Chips would have produced a quicker return, but again, without maximizing the benefits of the Akida design. Would we produce different sizes for different applications. Putting all our eggs in the IP licensing basket makes it a harder sell because of the up-front costs to the customer. But I am trusting that the superior performance of Akida will win over customers like Mercedes, and partners like Prophesee and SiFive, and marquee clients like NASA/DoD/DoE (DOE - that's right, we do do cybresecurity too).


The SP is down now, but within a few (short?) months ...

[Not financial advice, just part of an online discussion - if you have questions about investing in Brainchip, seek professional advice or, better still, do your own research and avoid the variegated foolish professional nay-sayers]
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 111 users
Hi rob,

I usually don't respond to what might be called would-be Cassandras, but you have taken some time to elucidate your thoughts.

I thought that when I bought in 5 years ago, the SP was about to explode because the company was giving a geeks presentation in the US, and I still believe the SP is about to explode. It's just taken a bit longer, or maybe it's a slow explosion ...

Starting with your 4 questions:

a response to Q1 would be the sort of thing for which the ASX would demand further and better particulars, which would put us in conflict with all the NDAs, a la Ford;

Similarly for Q2;

Q3 is reasonable, but I think this has been answered with the degree of specificity allowable under the NDAs - automotive, health, mechanical maintenance, aerospace, ... . As I said 5 years ago, it would be easier to list the areas where Akida cannot be used (it's a very short list).

Q4, see Q1.

Taking your example of mobile phones, the development cycle is several years, so, while we missed the recent releases and those shortly upcoming, there is nothing to suggest we are not being considered for future releases. Our association with Prophesee gives us a strong link into the process, especially given Synsense's admission of its low level applicability.

Remember BRN is on a steep learning curve. We need to discover what our customers need, and they don't know because they don't know how revolutionary Akida is. Last year we were talking about the recently invented LSTM functionality for "attention", and now we have bypassed that for ViT/TeNNs in Akida 2. This is not to say Akida 1 is obsolete. We have developed Akida 1500, which is Akida 1 el cheapo, or at least stripped of the ARM Cortex processor, available from 2 nodes (8 NPUs ) up to 20 nodes, whether you want an always-on wake-word watching device, a vibration monitor, or a full video processing chip.

The IP licensing business is a long haul project, much longer than selling chips.

You know that Renesas and Megachips are bringing out processors incorporating Akida 1. Renesas has its own in-house DRP-AI but has found applications where Akida is more relevant.
I find it encouraging to remember:

Prophesee loves us;

nViso loves us;

NASA is a fan;

Mercedes is impressed;

Valeo is a partner;

we are compatible with all ARM processors;

SiFive, ARM's up and coming rival, is also a partner;

...

It is true that the company has had a few major business model changes, and this has inevitably shifted expectations. We've been a software company, a chip company, and now an IP licensing company. Software provides only a pale shadow of Akida's capabilities. Chips would have produced a quicker return, but again, without maximizing the benefits of the Akida design. Would we produce different sizes for different applications. Putting all our eggs in the IP licensing basket makes it a harder sell because of the up-front costs to the customer. But I am trusting that the superior performance of Akida will win over customers like Mercedes, and partners like Prophesee and SiFive, and marquee clients like NASA/DoD/DoE (DOE - that's right, we do do cybresecurity too).


The SP is down now, but within a few (short?) months ...

[Not financial advice, just part of an online discussion - if you have questions about investing in Brainchip, seek professional advice or, better still, do your own research and avoid the variegated foolish professional nay-sayers]
Just on SiFive D.

We know NASA has also been looking at the X280.

I noticed on that recent presentation table that the X280 is also slated for 2025 with the RISC-V cores TBD.

To be designed? To be decided? To be developed?

Given we are also on the table stand alone and also have the SiFive relationship, do we have the capability to also be in the X280 cores mix possibly?

IMG_20230819_002905.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 24 users
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

chapman89

Founding Member
Hi rob,

I usually don't respond to what might be called would-be Cassandras, but you have taken some time to elucidate your thoughts.

I thought that when I bought in 5 years ago, the SP was about to explode because the company was giving a geeks presentation in the US, and I still believe the SP is about to explode. It's just taken a bit longer, or maybe it's a slow explosion ...

Starting with your 4 questions:

a response to Q1 would be the sort of thing for which the ASX would demand further and better particulars, which would put us in conflict with all the NDAs, a la Ford;

Similarly for Q2;

Q3 is reasonable, but I think this has been answered with the degree of specificity allowable under the NDAs - automotive, health, mechanical maintenance, aerospace, ... . As I said 5 years ago, it would be easier to list the areas where Akida cannot be used (it's a very short list).

Q4, see Q1.

Taking your example of mobile phones, the development cycle is several years, so, while we missed the recent releases and those shortly upcoming, there is nothing to suggest we are not being considered for future releases. Our association with Prophesee gives us a strong link into the process, especially given Synsense's admission of its low level applicability.

Remember BRN is on a steep learning curve. We need to discover what our customers need, and they don't know because they don't know how revolutionary Akida is. Last year we were talking about the recently invented LSTM functionality for "attention", and now we have bypassed that for ViT/TeNNs in Akida 2. This is not to say Akida 1 is obsolete. We have developed Akida 1500, which is Akida 1 el cheapo, or at least stripped of the ARM Cortex processor, available from 2 nodes (8 NPUs ) up to 20 nodes, whether you want an always-on wake-word watching device, a vibration monitor, or a full video processing chip.

The IP licensing business is a long haul project, much longer than selling chips.

You know that Renesas and Megachips are bringing out processors incorporating Akida 1. Renesas has its own in-house DRP-AI but has found applications where Akida is more relevant.
I find it encouraging to remember:

Prophesee loves us;

nViso loves us;

NASA is a fan;

Mercedes is impressed;

Valeo is a partner;

we are compatible with all ARM processors;

SiFive, ARM's up and coming rival, is also a partner;

...

It is true that the company has had a few major business model changes, and this has inevitably shifted expectations. We've been a software company, a chip company, and now an IP licensing company. Software provides only a pale shadow of Akida's capabilities. Chips would have produced a quicker return, but again, without maximizing the benefits of the Akida design. Would we produce different sizes for different applications. Putting all our eggs in the IP licensing basket makes it a harder sell because of the up-front costs to the customer. But I am trusting that the superior performance of Akida will win over customers like Mercedes, and partners like Prophesee and SiFive, and marquee clients like NASA/DoD/DoE (DOE - that's right, we do do cybresecurity too).


The SP is down now, but within a few (short?) months ...

[Not financial advice, just part of an online discussion - if you have questions about investing in Brainchip, seek professional advice or, better still, do your own research and avoid the variegated foolish professional nay-sayers]
Well said my friend 😁

Everybody keeps forgetting VALEO, Brainchip in my opinion is behind Scala3 which has already taken more than $1 billion euros in pre orders, and that was at the back end of last year, so maybe they’ve taken more pre orders?

Regardless, scala3 is hitting the market at the end of this year/very early 2024 in 2024 model vehicles.
Who here remembers the Valeo premier back in 2021? I certainly do. If you need a refresher, watch the video again.

Also, as @Diogenese can attest, automotive takes 3 years minimum, we (Brainchip) have a joint development with Valeo where we get paid on undisclosed milestones, that was announced back in June 2020.
I’ve posted this before, but on the CTO of Valeo interview post on LinkedIn about 2 months ago, I asked if they’ve achieved Scala3 by neuromorphic, this was the response I got from a Valeo employee below.
IMG_2526.jpeg

IMG_2650.png


It is happening, believe it, we will get paid and that will be a recurring income and will only grow as Scala3 becomes standard for even more vehicles.


Of course my opinion but based on the facts out there, who else can supply Valeo with their neuromorphic IP?? There is nobody. We’ve been through this before!
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 127 users

equanimous

Norse clairvoyant shapeshifter goddess
Well said my friend 😁

Everybody keeps forgetting VALEO, Brainchip in my opinion is behind Scala3 which has already taken more than $1 billion euros in pre orders, and that was at the back end of last year, so maybe they’ve taken more pre orders?

Regardless, scala3 is hitting the market at the end of this year/very early 2024 in 2024 model vehicles.
Who here remembers the Valeo premier back in 2021? I certainly do. If you need a refresher, watch the video again.

Also, as @Diogenese can attest, automotive takes 3 years minimum, we (Brainchip) have a joint development with Valeo where we get paid on undisclosed milestones, that was announced back in June 2020.
I’ve posted this before, but on the CTO of Valeo interview post on LinkedIn about 2 months ago, I asked if they’ve achieved Scala3 by neuromorphic, this was the response I got from a Valeo employee below.
View attachment 42507
View attachment 42508

It is happening, believe it, we will get paid and that will be a recurring income and will only grow as Scala3 becomes standard for even more vehicles.


Of course my opinion but based on the facts out there, who else can supply Valeo with their neuromorphic IP?? There is nobody. We’ve been through this before!
Im glad you verified that
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 24 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
Hi rob,

I usually don't respond to what might be called would-be Cassandras, but you have taken some time to elucidate your thoughts.

I thought that when I bought in 5 years ago, the SP was about to explode because the company was giving a geeks presentation in the US, and I still believe the SP is about to explode. It's just taken a bit longer, or maybe it's a slow explosion ...

Starting with your 4 questions:

a response to Q1 would be the sort of thing for which the ASX would demand further and better particulars, which would put us in conflict with all the NDAs, a la Ford;

Similarly for Q2;

Q3 is reasonable, but I think this has been answered with the degree of specificity allowable under the NDAs - automotive, health, mechanical maintenance, aerospace, ... . As I said 5 years ago, it would be easier to list the areas where Akida cannot be used (it's a very short list).

Q4, see Q1.

Taking your example of mobile phones, the development cycle is several years, so, while we missed the recent releases and those shortly upcoming, there is nothing to suggest we are not being considered for future releases. Our association with Prophesee gives us a strong link into the process, especially given Synsense's admission of its low level applicability.

Remember BRN is on a steep learning curve. We need to discover what our customers need, and they don't know because they don't know how revolutionary Akida is. Last year we were talking about the recently invented LSTM functionality for "attention", and now we have bypassed that for ViT/TeNNs in Akida 2. This is not to say Akida 1 is obsolete. We have developed Akida 1500, which is Akida 1 el cheapo, or at least stripped of the ARM Cortex processor, available from 2 nodes (8 NPUs ) up to 20 nodes, whether you want an always-on wake-word watching device, a vibration monitor, or a full video processing chip.

The IP licensing business is a long haul project, much longer than selling chips.

You know that Renesas and Megachips are bringing out processors incorporating Akida 1. Renesas has its own in-house DRP-AI but has found applications where Akida is more relevant.
I find it encouraging to remember:

Prophesee loves us;

nViso loves us;

NASA is a fan;

Mercedes is impressed;

Valeo is a partner;

we are compatible with all ARM processors;

SiFive, ARM's up and coming rival, is also a partner;

...

It is true that the company has had a few major business model changes, and this has inevitably shifted expectations. We've been a software company, a chip company, and now an IP licensing company. Software provides only a pale shadow of Akida's capabilities. Chips would have produced a quicker return, but again, without maximizing the benefits of the Akida design. Would we produce different sizes for different applications. Putting all our eggs in the IP licensing basket makes it a harder sell because of the up-front costs to the customer. But I am trusting that the superior performance of Akida will win over customers like Mercedes, and partners like Prophesee and SiFive, and marquee clients like NASA/DoD/DoE (DOE - that's right, we do do cybresecurity too).


The SP is down now, but within a few (short?) months ...

[Not financial advice, just part of an online discussion - if you have questions about investing in Brainchip, seek professional advice or, better still, do your own research and avoid the variegated foolish professional nay-sayers]
This is the bee's knees straight from the Diogenese. 🤣
Way to calm the horses O sitter of barrels. 🤣
And so Factual. 🤣
It's almost as if you were channeling a beloved ghosty. 🤣
But from whichever noggin this sprang, it's gold. 🤣
Thank you for this salving contribution to our collective angst. 🤣
Bring it, BrainChip!
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 37 users

robsmark

Regular
Hi rob,

I usually don't respond to what might be called would-be Cassandras, but you have taken some time to elucidate your thoughts.

I thought that when I bought in 5 years ago, the SP was about to explode because the company was giving a geeks presentation in the US, and I still believe the SP is about to explode. It's just taken a bit longer, or maybe it's a slow explosion ...

Starting with your 4 questions:

a response to Q1 would be the sort of thing for which the ASX would demand further and better particulars, which would put us in conflict with all the NDAs, a la Ford;

Similarly for Q2;

Q3 is reasonable, but I think this has been answered with the degree of specificity allowable under the NDAs - automotive, health, mechanical maintenance, aerospace, ... . As I said 5 years ago, it would be easier to list the areas where Akida cannot be used (it's a very short list).

Q4, see Q1.

Taking your example of mobile phones, the development cycle is several years, so, while we missed the recent releases and those shortly upcoming, there is nothing to suggest we are not being considered for future releases. Our association with Prophesee gives us a strong link into the process, especially given Synsense's admission of its low level applicability.

Remember BRN is on a steep learning curve. We need to discover what our customers need, and they don't know because they don't know how revolutionary Akida is. Last year we were talking about the recently invented LSTM functionality for "attention", and now we have bypassed that for ViT/TeNNs in Akida 2. This is not to say Akida 1 is obsolete. We have developed Akida 1500, which is Akida 1 el cheapo, or at least stripped of the ARM Cortex processor, available from 2 nodes (8 NPUs ) up to 20 nodes, whether you want an always-on wake-word watching device, a vibration monitor, or a full video processing chip.

The IP licensing business is a long haul project, much longer than selling chips.

You know that Renesas and Megachips are bringing out processors incorporating Akida 1. Renesas has its own in-house DRP-AI but has found applications where Akida is more relevant.
I find it encouraging to remember:

Prophesee loves us;

nViso loves us;

NASA is a fan;

Mercedes is impressed;

Valeo is a partner;

we are compatible with all ARM processors;

SiFive, ARM's up and coming rival, is also a partner;

...

It is true that the company has had a few major business model changes, and this has inevitably shifted expectations. We've been a software company, a chip company, and now an IP licensing company. Software provides only a pale shadow of Akida's capabilities. Chips would have produced a quicker return, but again, without maximizing the benefits of the Akida design. Would we produce different sizes for different applications. Putting all our eggs in the IP licensing basket makes it a harder sell because of the up-front costs to the customer. But I am trusting that the superior performance of Akida will win over customers like Mercedes, and partners like Prophesee and SiFive, and marquee clients like NASA/DoD/DoE (DOE - that's right, we do do cybresecurity too).


The SP is down now, but within a few (short?) months ...

[Not financial advice, just part of an online discussion - if you have questions about investing in Brainchip, seek professional advice or, better still, do your own research and avoid the variegated foolish professional nay-sayers]

Hey Dio,

Thank you for the detailed response.

You’re a valued contributor here on a technical front, and I appreciate your input.

I’m not sure I appreciate your consideration of me being a “Cassandra“. I don’t think it’s fair to play this off as an emotional post, as would stand by it even if the SP shot off to $5 on open tomorrow.

Starting with your 4 questions:

a response to Q1 would be the sort of thing for which the ASX would demand further and better particulars, which would put us in conflict with all the NDAs, a la Ford;

I‘m pleased you brought this up. Are we still engaged with Ford? It’s been over three years now (25/5/2020) since Brainchip announced that Ford were ”evaluating“ Akida and since then we have heard nothing. This is my point Dio, there is no transparency. Is three years‘ an unreasonable duration of time for a shareholder update? I think not. For all we know, Ford have gone quiet and the company have decided not to disclose it due to a technicality - perhaps they never formally terminated the agreement. I’m not saying this has happened, but it’s certainly plausible after this duration.


Similarly for Q2;

Q3 is reasonable, but I think this has been answered with the degree of specificity allowable under the NDAs - automotive, health, mechanical maintenance, aerospace, ... . As I said 5 years ago, it would be easier to list the areas where Akida cannot be used (it's a very short list).

It hasn’t been answered at all. The company have alluded to working with these sectors. And to state it’s easier to state where Akida cannot be used is besides the point. I understand the use-cases are practically infinite, but that doesn’t mean we are engaged with infinite “customers”, and nobody knows, as we aren’t updated of any specifics.

Q4, see Q1.

Taking your example of mobile phones, the development cycle is several years, so, while we missed the recent releases and those shortly upcoming, there is nothing to suggest we are not being considered for future releases. Our association with Prophesee gives us a strong link into the process, especially given Synsense's admission of its low level applicability.

There is nothing to support that we are being considered for future releases either. Absolutely nothing.

The fact is that Brainchip hasn’t mentioned the EAP is a very long time. Nothing about the participants, nothing about progress, nothing about the potential. Simply nothing. Woulds, coulds, and maybes won’t change this. The company needs to update the market on the status of this program without breaking contractual obligations. It shouldn’t be hard, they’ve have years to figure this out, unless of course there’s nothing to update?


Remember BRN is on a steep learning curve. We need to discover what our customers need, and they don't know because they don't know how revolutionary Akida is. Last year we were talking about the recently invented LSTM functionality for "attention", and now we have bypassed that for ViT/TeNNs in Akida 2. This is not to say Akida 1 is obsolete. We have developed Akida 1500, which is Akida 1 el cheapo, or at least stripped of the ARM Cortex processor, available from 2 nodes (8 NPUs ) up to 20 nodes, whether you want an always-on wake-word watching device, a vibration monitor, or a full video processing chip.

The IP licensing business is a long haul project, much longer than selling chips.
- If I recall correctly, Renesas came out of nowhere, the company were surprised by this licensing agreement, so I find your argument weak here. It’s been years since our last licensing agreement, and the Company itself has admitted that this is taking longer than expected, and that was a while ago! Where are they??? Why aren’t they licensing a groundbreaking innovation like Akida???

You know that Renesas and Megachips are bringing out processors incorporating Akida 1. Renesas has its own in-house DRP-AI but has found applications where Akida is more relevant.

I find it encouraging to remember:

Prophesee loves us;
Where is the licence?

nViso loves us; Where is the licence?

NASA is a fan;

Mercedes is impressed;
Why isn’t it in their cars, and licensed?

Valeo is a partner; Where is the licence?

we are compatible with all ARM processors; Then why hasn’t anyone licensed it?

SiFive, ARM's up and coming rival, is also a partner; Where is the licence?

...My intention isn’t to be objective for the sake of being objective. The point is it’s all hearsay until someone signs and we generate revenue, for some reason that hasn’t happened, and I want to know what the feedback is as to why that is.

We cannot survive on partnerships, we aren’t a university or a funded research centre, we are a company that needs revenue and answers to shareholders.

It is true that the company has had a few major business model changes, and this has inevitably shifted expectations. We've been a software company, a chip company, and now an IP licensing company. Software provides only a pale shadow of Akida's capabilities. Chips would have produced a quicker return, but again, without maximizing the benefits of the Akida design. Would we produce different sizes for different applications. Putting all our eggs in the IP licensing basket makes it a harder sell because of the up-front costs to the customer. But I am trusting that the superior performance of Akida will win over customers like Mercedes, and partners like Prophesee and SiFive, and marquee clients like NASA/DoD/DoE (DOE - that's right, we do do cybresecurity too).

We don’t do cyber secunity. We currently do nothing. We currently have our IP in zero products. This is a fact Dio. As evident by the lack of revenue. Why???

I’m not saying we’ve failed yet, I believe the tech is strong, but for some reason people aren’t buying it, and I’d like to see some detail as to why.

The SP is down now, but within a few (short?) months ...

Come on mate, we’ve been in a death spiral for 30 months!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 23 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Just on SiFive D.
We know NASA has also been looking at the X280.
I noticed on that recent presentation table that the X280 is also slated for 2025 with the RISC-V cores TBD.
To be designed? To be decided? To be developed?
Given we are also on the table stand alone and also have the SiFive relationship, do we have the capability to also be in the X280 cores mix possibly?

View attachment 42506
Do we have the capability to also be in the X280 cores mix possibly?

I'm going to go with "YES" on that one.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

wilzy123

Founding Member
Well said my friend 😁

Everybody keeps forgetting VALEO, Brainchip in my opinion is behind Scala3 which has already taken more than $1 billion euros in pre orders, and that was at the back end of last year, so maybe they’ve taken more pre orders?

Regardless, scala3 is hitting the market at the end of this year/very early 2024 in 2024 model vehicles.
Who here remembers the Valeo premier back in 2021? I certainly do. If you need a refresher, watch the video again.

Also, as @Diogenese can attest, automotive takes 3 years minimum, we (Brainchip) have a joint development with Valeo where we get paid on undisclosed milestones, that was announced back in June 2020.
I’ve posted this before, but on the CTO of Valeo interview post on LinkedIn about 2 months ago, I asked if they’ve achieved Scala3 by neuromorphic, this was the response I got from a Valeo employee below.
View attachment 42507
View attachment 42508

It is happening, believe it, we will get paid and that will be a recurring income and will only grow as Scala3 becomes standard for even more vehicles.


Of course my opinion but based on the facts out there, who else can supply Valeo with their neuromorphic IP?? There is nobody. We’ve been through this before!

Valeo (global leader in ADAS solutions) have been PUMPING Mercedes in all their marketing material. Scala3 is coming and Merc are no doubt a healthy portion of their huge pre-orders.



Mercedes also haven't lost their appetite for Neuromorphic, having advertised the position "Development engineer in the field of artificial intelligence with a focus on neuromorphic computing and ADAS (f/m/x)" (https://jobs.mercedes-benz.com/job/...on-neuromorphic-computing-and-adas-f-m-x.html) with these goals:
  1. Applied research in the field of neuromorphic computing and spiking neural networks
  2. Development of innovative algorithms for automotive applications
  3. Implementation of neuromorphic algorithms for automotive applications
  4. Researching and transferring current neuromorphic computing trends for automotive applications with a special focus on ADAS
  5. Conceptual implementation of ideas and development of demonstrators
  6. Close cooperation with colleagues from the project and the specialist departments
  7. Involvement in the development of new ideas and in the development of the strategic orientation of the project
  8. Close cooperation with universities, research institutions, technology companies and start-ups
  9. Supervision of internships, bachelor and master thesis and doctoral dissertations
Maybe the Nigerian Prince can apply and tell them all about the SP.🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣

Here's Valeo's view on the role of AI in their state of the art Scala 3 presented at the last CES.

 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 41 users

gilti

Regular
Afternoon WhiteDove ,

Try 33 Month Low ,

Regards,
Esq
try i week short of 35 months low.
everybody who has brought since 28/9/2020 is underwater on that purchase
this is total bollocks and ignores all progress for nearly 3 years
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
The only thing I'm pissed off about is I haven't got any readies to buy more.
50,000 shares for only $16,250. Someone got lucky I reckon😩
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 16 users

cosors

👀

"Neuromorphic Chips-Top Five Important Things You Need To Know​


Neuromorphic Chips: Unveiling the Future of Cognitive Computing

In the realm of cutting-edge technology, the pursuit of mimicking the extraordinary capabilities of the human brain has led to the development of neuromorphic chips. These innovative chips represent a paradigm shift in the field of artificial intelligence and computing, striving to emulate the intricate neural networks and cognitive functions of the human brain. Unlike traditional digital processors that rely on binary logic and sequential operations, neuromorphic chips leverage a biologically inspired approach, harnessing the power of parallelism and adaptability to revolutionize various domains, including machine learning, robotics, and sensory processing. By emulating the brain’s efficient neural connections, these chips hold the potential to unlock unprecedented levels of energy efficiency, speed, and versatility, ultimately paving the way for a new era of cognitive computing.

Neuromorphic chips, at their core, embody the convergence of neuroscience and computer engineering. The term “neuromorphic” stems from the fusion of “neuro,” referring to neurons and neural networks, and “morph,” suggesting a form or structure. Essentially, these chips are engineered to replicate the neural architecture and behavior of the brain, aiming to bridge the gap between biological cognition and artificial intelligence. The human brain’s astounding capabilities, such as pattern recognition, sensory processing, and adaptive learning, have served as a wellspring of inspiration for scientists and engineers in their quest to create intelligent machines that can simulate human-like reasoning.

Unlike conventional processors that operate based on the binary on-off switches of transistors, neuromorphic chips employ a vastly different approach. They consist of networks of artificial neurons and synapses that communicate and process information in a manner akin to biological neural circuits. These neurons, often simplified abstractions of real neurons, communicate through analog signals, allowing for continuous variations in their output. This analog nature enables neuromorphic chips to process information with remarkable efficiency, as they can simultaneously process multiple inputs and perform complex computations in parallel. The result is a significant reduction in power consumption and a potential leap in computational speed, making them highly attractive for various applications where energy efficiency and real-time processing are crucial.

The development of neuromorphic chips has also rekindled interest in hardware acceleration for artificial intelligence tasks. While traditional computing paradigms, such as the von Neumann architecture, have propelled technological progress for decades, they are increasingly encountering limitations when faced with the demands of complex AI algorithms, particularly those related to deep learning. Neuromorphic chips, however, are tailor-made for these types of algorithms due to their neural network-inspired design. This has led to a growing recognition of their potential to usher in a new era of efficient and high-performance AI processing, catalyzing research and investment in this innovative field.

Intriguingly, one of the remarkable aspects of neuromorphic chips is their ability to learn and adapt to new information, similar to the plasticity of biological brains. This phenomenon, known as synaptic plasticity, allows the strength of connections between artificial neurons to be modified based on the patterns of input they receive. This intrinsic learning capability opens the door to unsupervised learning, where machines can autonomously extract meaningful patterns from data without explicit programming. Such self-learning characteristics are especially valuable in scenarios where traditional rule-based programming becomes impractical due to the complexity and variability of the data.

In essence, neuromorphic chips hold the potential to redefine the landscape of computing and artificial intelligence. Their emergence marks a departure from the rigid, rule-based processing of traditional digital systems, ushering in an era of adaptable, parallel, and energy-efficient computing inspired by the neural elegance of the human brain. As researchers delve deeper into the intricacies of neuromorphic design and capitalize on their promising characteristics, these chips could unlock a multitude of transformative applications, from brain-inspired robotics to intricate real-time sensory processing. While challenges remain, including refining the accuracy and scalability of these systems, the trajectory of neuromorphic chips underscores their potential to shape the future of cognitive computing and propel us into an era where machines not only compute but truly comprehend.

Parallel Processing:
Neuromorphic chips are designed to process information in a massively parallel manner, similar to how the human brain’s billions of neurons work together simultaneously. This parallelism allows for the efficient execution of complex computations, enabling tasks such as pattern recognition and data analysis to be performed with exceptional speed.

Analog Signal Processing:
Unlike traditional digital processors that use discrete on-off signals, neuromorphic chips operate with analog signals. This analog nature enables them to perform continuous computations and process real-world data with a high degree of precision, leading to improved accuracy in tasks that require subtle variations or gradient-based learning.

Adaptive Learning:
One of the defining features of neuromorphic chips is their ability to exhibit synaptic plasticity, akin to the brain’s ability to adapt and learn from experience. The connections between artificial neurons can be dynamically strengthened or weakened based on the input patterns they receive. This intrinsic learning capability allows for unsupervised learning and the extraction of meaningful insights from raw data.

Energy Efficiency:
Neuromorphic chips are designed with energy efficiency in mind. The parallel and analog processing nature reduces the need for excessive power consumption, making them particularly suited for applications where low energy consumption is crucial, such as mobile devices, edge computing, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices.

Real-time Processing:
The combination of parallelism, analog processing, and adaptive learning equips neuromorphic chips with the ability to process information in real-time. This makes them well-suited for tasks that require rapid decision-making and response, such as autonomous vehicles, robotics, and real-time sensor data analysis.

These key features collectively distinguish neuromorphic chips from traditional digital processors and underline their potential to revolutionize various fields, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, robotics, and beyond.

Neuromorphic chips stand as a testament to the relentless pursuit of understanding and emulating the remarkable computational capabilities of the human brain. Rooted in the principles of neuromorphic engineering, these chips embody a fusion of neuroscience, computer science, and engineering prowess. They represent a convergence of disciplines, aiming to bridge the gap between the complex workings of biological neural networks and the creation of artificial systems that can replicate, to some extent, the brain’s intricate functions.

The inception of neuromorphic chips emerged as a response to the limitations of traditional digital processors in tackling certain types of complex computations. While digital processors excel in performing sequential tasks with high precision, they encounter challenges when dealing with tasks that require parallelism, adaptability, and the kind of cognitive flexibility that human brains effortlessly exhibit. Neuromorphic chips arose as a visionary alternative, built upon the inspiration drawn from nature’s most sophisticated computational structure.

One of the captivating aspects of neuromorphic chips lies in their ability to unravel the mysteries of the brain’s information processing mechanisms. By attempting to mimic the neuronal connections and signal propagation observed in the brain, scientists and engineers dive deep into the intricate dance of ions and neurotransmitters that underlie human cognition. These chips provide a tangible platform to experiment with theories about learning, memory, and decision-making. This emulation, while far from a complete replication of the brain’s complexity, offers a unique playground to test hypotheses about neural behavior and explore novel methods of computation.

The journey of developing neuromorphic chips is fraught with challenges, yet every obstacle fuels the flames of innovation. Researchers delve into the fundamental physics of materials, seeking to replicate the behavior of synapses and neurons in silicon and other semiconductor substrates. The quest involves developing models that not only capture the essence of neural connections but also encapsulate the plasticity – the brain’s ability to strengthen or weaken connections based on experience. This endeavor has given rise to intricate algorithms, programming languages, and simulation tools specifically designed to harness the potential of neuromorphic hardware.

In the grand tapestry of technology, the story of neuromorphic chips intertwines with the ambitions of creating machines that possess cognitive capabilities. These chips invite us to ponder questions about the nature of intelligence, the boundaries between biology and technology, and the ethical implications of creating systems that mimic human-like learning and decision-making. The drive to replicate the brain’s marvels is accompanied by a profound curiosity – a desire to understand not only how the brain computes but also how it gives rise to consciousness, emotions, and the rich tapestry of human experience.

Neuromorphic chips, however, do not exist in isolation. Their development has sparked collaborations across disciplines, transcending the boundaries of computer science and neuroscience. Researchers from various domains join hands to unravel the mysteries of cognition, bringing together insights from psychology, neurobiology, physics, materials science, and more. This multidisciplinary effort mirrors the interconnectedness of the human brain itself, where diverse regions collaborate to create the symphony of thoughts and actions.

As neuromorphic chips evolve, they have the potential to alter the landscape of artificial intelligence, paving the way for more efficient and brain-inspired computing models. These chips offer promise in applications ranging from medical diagnostics, where they could aid in the interpretation of complex data such as brain scans, to environmental monitoring, where they could analyze vast datasets in real time. Their deployment in robotics might enable machines to perceive and interact with the world in a manner that feels more natural and intuitive.

In the larger context, the journey of neuromorphic chips underscores the remarkable feat of human ingenuity. It illustrates our capacity to draw inspiration from nature’s most intricate designs and transform them into tangible innovations that shape the world. These chips symbolize the unending pursuit of pushing boundaries, not merely for the sake of technology, but to uncover the secrets of existence itself.

In conclusion, the story of neuromorphic chips is a narrative of ambition, curiosity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. It is a testament to humanity’s quest to comprehend the enigmatic workings of the brain and translate that understanding into revolutionary technology. Neuromorphic chips stand at the crossroads of science and imagination, inspiring us to delve deeper into the realms of cognition, computation, and consciousness. As they continue to evolve, they hold the potential to reshape our relationship with technology and guide us towards a future where the boundaries between human and machine become increasingly blurred."
https://dotcommagazine.com/2023/08/neuromorphic-chips-top-five-important-things-you-need-to-know/ .)
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users

Slade

Top 20
A lot of shareholders that have been holding BRN shares for years and years have been patiently waiting for these next 9 months. These are the championship rounds. No time for the wobbles now. Can’t understand the efforts some are making to try and convince others that they should be worried.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 56 users

JDelekto

Regular
As far as Akida is concerned, the configuration of the NN determining the number of layers and in allocating NPUs to each layer, and the determination of the weights from the model library are the functions carried out by the CPU preliminary to using the NN to classify input signal spikes.

For CPU based SNNs, the programme includes instructions to compare the model library imges and the incoming signals.
I'll add my $0.02 to this excellent response.

Aside from algorithm development, Akida is used to its full advantage by sensors that provide event-based output. There are many different types of sensors, but those which require no conversion, like Prophesee's event-based vision solution, will provide the best integration.

The algorithms that will come into play will be applications that use Akida's one-shot learning (such as training for a new voice, image, vibration, gustatory or taste, etc.) and inferencing for specific tasks. NVISO's algorithms detecting the emotional state of passengers in a vehicle most likely use several models to detect eye position, mouth shape, etc.

Consider a toy that will learn the voice of the child that owns it and determine their mood based on their current facial expression, and provide seemingly empathic responses. This is where I think the algorithms come into play; some of these solutions would work with other inferencing chips, and the performance and minimal power requirements would make it ideal for toys and wearables while leaving them disconnected from the cloud.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 30 users
Top Bottom