Xhosa12345
Regular
ahh legend, i did miss that - sorry all!
Thanks Esq,Good Afternoon Diogenese,
Cracking effort as per usual.
Below is my little list, hope it can add to the collective.
Cheers once again.
Regards,
Esq.
Hi Rob.
My point is that looking back mistakes may have been made, the absolute pristine path of growth may have been missed and that it stinks that our share price is lower at the moment than its all time highs. As a fellow share holder these are all points of concern.
However, I choose to focus my attention on what Sean and the Company are doing now to try and address these issues.
They have some baggage to clear from the past, and, as ugly as it may appear, I would like them to be rid of it so they can focus on lessons learnt, and get on with it.
Some may think Sean has had his chance and did not cut the mustard, but I think he deserves more time to get the Company traction and I'm yet to hear an alternate plan of action moving forward, beyond "off with his head".
I think we need to back in our management, acknowledging they are but merely human, and thus liable to error, and having hopefully learned from such, support their ongoing efforts on our behalf in moving forward and progressing the Company and its aims, which will eventually be reflected in our share price.
If your team fumbles and stumbles calling them names may bring a brief moment of self gratification but it's ultimately not conducive to the result desired. That, in a nutshell is my point.
But they still need to be accountable and address the valid concerns of Shareholders. Our money is paying their salaries and bonuses. To continue in this secretive (NDA bubble) whilst not putting ASX announcements out (price sensitive or not) simply can't continue. Particularly when the SP has retraced by around 75% and the latest 4C had an insignificant revenue figure. The lack of transparency here and inability to navigate the ASX reporting rules is particularly unprofessional for a listed company. By their actions our management are enabling the shorters to decimate the value of our holdings.
These NDA's had better lead to revenue soon, otherwise using them as a reason for suppressing the flow of information to shareholders may be seen as a deceitful tactic.
So we have around 30,000 plus everyday investors, how many off these keep in touch with social media? maybe 10 or 20% max, which means only 6000 share holders would have been privy to news being released by brainchip via social media over the last year or so. So if you were a new investor and wanted to invest in brainchip and decide to check out the asx announcements it wouldn’t really excite you to invest, when really with all the news over the last year it should be the complete opposite.
News like today should be released via the asx and who ever decision it is not to release this information, is not only causing a negative effect on the sp, it’s also making enemies of us share holders. This needs to stop now before I find out who it is and kick them in theSurely going to the website of the company you are thinking of investing is not unreasonable.
Makes me wonder why I bother sharing the tweet of the partnership in the first place.
Quick list of guaranteed things
- Death
- Taxes
- Complaints and negativity when BRN announce anything on any platform outside of the ASX
So we have around 30,000 plus everyday investors, how many off these keep in touch with social media? maybe 10 or 20% max, which means only 6000 share holders would have been privy to news being released by brainchip via social media over the last year or so. So if you were a new investor and wanted to invest in brainchip and decide to check out the asx announcements it wouldn’t really excite you to invest, when really with all the news over the last year it should be the complete opposite.
Come on BRAINCHIP pull your heads in and start releasing more news on the asx.
Surely going to the website of the company you are thinking of investing is not unreasonable.Surely going to the website of the company you are thinking of investing is not unreasonable.
Makes me wonder why I bother sharing the tweet of the partnership in the first place.
Quick list of guaranteed things
- Death
- Taxes
- Complaints and negativity when BRN announce anything on any platform outside of the ASX
I really honestly think they don’t give a f..k about these announcements as it ain’t brain science to get it right.View attachment 36570
Our dude doesn't seem to be doing his job properly. 'Proper communication' is not Twitter. The reason they refuse to announce this stuff through the ASX, as stated by management, is that they previously screwed it up and got in trouble. Fix it. Please...
Hey ho, everyone. Is anyone hav8ng trouble posting at *the other place*? I'm in the middle of a heated discussion with shareman about that Plato guy and this is not the first time I've been unable to publish my post over the years. I used to think it was just my phone telling me to calm my farm and get back to work but now I'm starting to wonder..
Does anyone have the same problem over there where their post won't... post - it's just non-responsive? Please let me know because I'm starting to draw all sorts of conspiracy theory dots right now.. :/
Also, *he* never seems to have this problem, 2800 posts later.
News like today should be released via the asx and who ever decision it is not to release this information, is not only causing a negative effect on the sp, it’s also making enemies of us share holders. This needs to stop now before I find out who it is and kick them in the
Hi Kiki.Hey ho, everyone. Is anyone hav8ng trouble posting at *the other place*? I'm in the middle of a heated discussion with shareman about that Plato guy and this is not the first time I've been unable to publish my post over the years. I used to think it was just my phone telling me to calm my farm and get back to work but now I'm starting to wonder..
Does anyone have the same problem over there where their post won't... post - it's just non-responsive? Please let me know because I'm starting to draw all sorts of conspiracy theory dots right now.. :/
Also, *he* never seems to have this problem, 2800 posts later.
So go back where you belong your not wanted here.
In HC's defence, they released BRN and Quantum Ventura news today...Hi Kiki.
We all left that other place after confirming to our own satisfaction that quite likely all your conspiracy theories are correct.
It seems to favour a conflict model to keep eyes and hands twichin' and many have previously expressed the leaning towards an uncomfortably noticeable bias. When we were there, BRN was the indubitable king of those threads, but when Zeebot set this up as an alternative, most of us have left them to play in the mire on their own. Here a'int perfect, but its a hell of a saner place to spend one's time.
Occasionally we'll slum it over there for the giggles and the pisstake, but all the serious discussion happens here.
Cheers!![]()
Sorry I think your justI beg your pardon? Wtf are you on about?
Also, anyone who is in regular communication with the company - who is your point of contact? And does anyone know if they have any in-house legal on staff? This rubbish getting bandied about all over the place by Plato is beyond the pale. This really needs to be addressed and shut down. As shareholders we should all be concerned, it's a targeted attack.
I want to know what these 20 other redflags are so that we can put them to the company and have their feedback.
I don't want to give Plato's flame-fanning any oxygen, I am confident this is just another shortseller's market-influencing ploy, but nevertheless this needs to be addressed, if even only by a strongly worded letter from BRN'S legal representation, because this guy has come out from under the usual anonymous HC posters rock covering and is bandying about qualifications that seem legit but he's making BIG allegations that, as shareholders, we should be rightly concerned about being published.
Hi Kiki.
We all left that other place after confirming to our own satisfaction that quite likely all your conspiracy theories are correct.
It seems to favour a conflict model to keep eyes and hands twichin' and many have previously expressed the leaning towards an uncomfortably noticeable bias. When we were there, BRN was the indubitable king of those threads, but when Zeebot set this up as an alternative, most of us have left them to play in the mire on their own. Here a'int perfect, but its a hell of a saner place to spend one's time.
Occasionally we'll slum it over there for the giggles and the pisstake, but all the serious discussion happens here.
Cheers!![]()
Sorry I think your just