Fact Finder
Top 20
Innatera has been around for a while now and the last time it came up which was reasonably recent when we dug into it again for the umptieth time tucked away in the latest release was a line to the effect they still had to iron out the problem with production issues. @Diogenese has often written about the main issue with analogue is the inability to produce the chips without errors (my words) and in my words again a tiny error/defect in analogue will multiply when being used for spiking neuromorphic computing. This production issue is why Peter van der Made and Anil Mankar went with digital so it is reliable, cheap and capable of mass production across a range of different processes and foundries.There is also another future BRN competitor, Innatera. They appear to still be in R&D phase.
Innatera’s ultra-efficient neuromorphic processors mimic the brain’s mechanisms for processing sensory data. Based on a proprietary analog-mixed signal computing architecture, Innatera’s processors leverage the computing capabilities of spiking neural networks to deliver ground-breaking cognition performance within a narrow power envelope. With an unprecedented combination of ultra-low power consumption and short response latency, these devices enable high-performance always-on pattern recognition capabilities in applications at the sensor-edge.
Ultra low power intelligence for the sensor edge. | Innatera
Our processors help sensors recognise patterns with more energy efficiency, lower latency and greater privacy.www.innatera.com
Innatera tech is analog-mixed signal whereas Akida is digital.
I suspect that when they work out how to do it and many have tried before them it will be a more expensive process and they will be at a different price point. A lot of water to flow under their bridge before they are actually a competitor in the mass end of the market with AKIDA at low cost.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA