Sirod69
bavarian girl ;-)
I totally agree with them. I would really like an explanation from BRN on this, but I will not write to anyone about it now. It's not okay to publish something of any kind and then withdraw it. I hope this doesn't harm BRN, it seems it happened by mistakeIMO ....... you are correct to some degree, in that it's not possible to put a value on this "supposedly partnership ".... but I still think the undated BRN Co presumptive notice carries a fair degree of price sensitive information for ASX purposes, especially based on the fact, that s/holders or investors may have now attached / attributed some commercial importance to that disclosed information actually published on the BRN media web platform / page ....... imo, a Co can't just put out a notice in a Co web page, then just to pull it off again, like as if it never took place ..... It's just like a mining Co announcing/saying they found gold in the morning and then within a few hours they have taken that notice down off their web page, like as if it never happened !!!! ............. I really think, that the Co now need's the Co Secretary to urgently provide them with his advice as to how this matter should be treated or actioned upon well before the start of ASX trading this morning ........... I personally think that the Co needs to fess up to the oversight / mistake well before the ASX sends out a please explain notice and put another negative strike next to our Co's name and ongoing reputation, which the Co seem's to want to avoid at all cost's especially given's Tony D last general comments provided to TSE via another prominent member of the 1,000 eye's group.
@Boab , yes I hope so!