Fact Finder
Top 20
And they are so quick by the time I check the serial number to see if its one I am missing it is already sold. So annoying.Massive trade in collector shares though. View attachment 18573





And they are so quick by the time I check the serial number to see if its one I am missing it is already sold. So annoying.Massive trade in collector shares though. View attachment 18573
Thanks DChalk and cheese. As you say there is no acronym police, so when presented with acronyms in a new technology, it's important to know the context and what the author intends.
This is a software solution running on GPUs. It is for "distributed training", ie, those little blokes on the left of the diagram are collaboratively doing the training (image labelling).
The author explained that normal CNN is not so hot for long objects or occlusions.
Their SCNN is related to the interconnexion of neurons in the same layer (Normally, neurons in one layer do not talk to each other, only to neurons in the next layer).
Spatial Convolutional Neural Network (SCNN) generalizes the CNN to a rich spatial level. It allows information propagation between neurons in the same layer, which makes it best suited for structured objects such as lanes, poles, or truck with occlusions. This compatibility is because the spatial information can be reinforced, and it preserves smoothness and continuity.
I don't see why this could not be applied in Akida, but a definitive answer is above my pay grade.
If these deals where already penciled in between customers and Brainchip, then the surrounding economic factors are unlikely to affect them. It is highly unlikely that tech giants (Fortune 500, etc.) would change their strategic plan based on a war in Ukraine, or high (as expected following COVID) inflation figures.I'd rather be surprised to the upside, than disappointed..
If royalties do get a mention, as having started to flow, which I think is a very real possibility, I don't think we will ever see, a break up of incoming revenues..
Good Fortune to all Holders!
Slava Ukraini!
You cannot be suggesting that something suspicious is taking place on the ASX. Heaven forbid. I just cannot see that being allowed. We are a democracy with the rule of law.Take those numbers with a grain of salt.
Date Reported Short 05/10/2022 115,318,892 04/10/2022 113,784,258 03/10/2022 117,183,327 30/09/2022 117,471,870
Gross shorts for the 4th 1,265,143.
Do you believe that on the 4th they managed to cover 4,664,212 shares ( 1,265,143 gross new shorts on 4th + 3,399,069 covered net positions shorts from 3rd ) when the trading volume on the day was 8,002,430 ?
That would mean that trading volume on the 4th was
~58% short covering
~16% new shorts
~26% normal trade
or
~74% shorting trade ( new/covering )
~26% normal trade
.....
A birds-eye view of the activity.
View attachment 18571
View attachment 18572
Price has been roughly around the $1 mark since 03/2022 but reported net short position keeps increasing from then 35M or 2% to where we are now.
The problem is, all the "reported" figures need to be taken with, not only a grain of salt, but a generous shaking of the container..Take those numbers with a grain of salt.
Date Reported Short 05/10/2022 115,318,892 04/10/2022 113,784,258 03/10/2022 117,183,327 30/09/2022 117,471,870
Gross shorts for the 4th 1,265,143.
Do you believe that on the 4th they managed to cover 4,664,212 shares ( 1,265,143 gross new shorts on 4th + 3,399,069 covered net positions shorts from 3rd ) when the trading volume on the day was 8,002,430 ?
That would mean that trading volume on the 4th was
~58% short covering
~16% new shorts
~26% normal trade
or
~74% shorting trade ( new/covering )
~26% normal trade
.....
A birds-eye view of the activity.
View attachment 18571
View attachment 18572
Price has been roughly around the $1 mark since 03/2022 but reported net short position keeps increasing from then 35M or 2% to where we are now.
Here is a list of cameras in Sony’s product line which contain Sony’s Event Based Vision sensor ( well at least I assume it is ) . I can’t download it as you need to register with a valid email address , not a free one…I only have a gmail account. Maybe someone would like to try and download it see if it contains any juicy info.
![]()
Event-based Vision Sensor (EVS)#391 | Products & Solutions | Sony Semiconductor Solutions Group
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Group develops device business which includes Micro display, LSIs, and Semiconductor Laser, in focusing on Image Sensor.www.sony-semicon.com
Download
A list of cameras with Event-based Vision Sensor (EVS)
Download a list of cameras that incorporate Sony's Event-based Vision Sensor
Register to Download
There's only one camera Sony listsThanks but I can’t get it to open
The download said cameras…plural. Ripped offThere's only one camera Sony lists..
And it's made by Prophesee..
Who are they..
Strange. No problem, will screenshot it. This is all that's inside the document:Thanks but I can’t get it to open
You cannot be suggesting that something suspicious is taking place on the ASX. Heaven forbid. I just cannot see that being allowed. We are a democracy with the rule of law.![]()
From the Prophesee link you provided.The extensive list of one contains:
“Prophesee
USB3.0
https://www.prophesee.ai/event- camera-evk4/
Prophesee's EVK(Evaluation Kit)can be used for evaluation purpouse only”
Evaluation Kit only for my money leaves lots of room for a subtle upgrade to the production model before mass production begins.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
For us to have the explosive growth, don't we need multiple announcements on licensing agreements?If these deals where already penciled in between customers and Brainchip, then the surrounding economic factors are unlikely to affect them. It is highly unlikely that tech giants (Fortune 500, etc.) would change their strategic plan based on a war in Ukraine, or high (as expected following COVID) inflation figures.
Tech is a race, and it always has been - to use Samsung and Apple as an example, Apple has a plan to release an iPhone in two years, as would Samsung with the Galaxy. Each of these companies are testing, signing, making deals with whomever suppliers to implement into these future offerings. If they terminate a deal that is required to develop these products in a effort to reduce expenditure in the short-term, they pay for that exponentially in the long-term. Say Apple puts a deal on hold and Samsung decides to push ahead - then when two companies each release their respective product, the better one will gain more market share. Besides, for the most part payment for these suppliers (Brainchip in this case) is made as the company releases their products into the wild - (e.g., in two years time), so by tis logic, these deals have already been signed (perhaps under the umbrella for an existing material customer), and the payment/revenue to Brainchip is due on X,Y,Z. This is especially true in a world where tech innovation has plateaued, I mean how impressive are new phone (as an example) releases over their predecessors?
Obviously this is a dream scenario (Apple and Samsung), but the principal remains consistent with tech companies of all valuations. Its a brutal industry - dog eat dog - survival of the fittest. Evident if we cast our eyes back over the years when considering companies like Nokia, Compaq, Blackberry, even Blockbuster... They failed to innovate, and they failed as a company. These lessons have already been learnt, and big tech knows this. This is why Intel is pumping $billions into SNN research - its failed to innovate over recent years, and now it needs to make up ground.
The other indicator for me is Sean Hehir, our own CEO. A seasoned Silicon Valley executive who obviously understands business and big tech. During an interview with Tom Piotrowski (Commsec), this May, he stated, and I quote, "I look forward to standing in front of you next year, and talking about results". I for one did not take that statement lightly, and I'm pretty sure that Sean wouldn't have said it unless he was absolutely certain that he (they) would be successful in delivering - free markets have a nose for bullshit, and a failure to deliver would be career suicide, especially for a new CEO, regardless of surrounding economic factors (especially true given he made that statement during COVID and an already fractured market).
Peter has said it, Sean has said it, the company has a market ready product - explosive growth is what I expect.
The problem is, all the "reported" figures need to be taken with, not only a grain of salt, but a generous shaking of the container..
But we need some kind of gauge..
They know we monitor the figures and if any psychological edge, can be attained by skewing them, would they?
They need only "report", "not report" or report fictional figures, as they see fit.
Who's going to stop them?
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)?
That bunch of gutless, hand under the table, pen pushers?
As long as some are doing the right thing and reporting their stupid bets against us, which is evidenced by the overall "strengthening" short position, I'm happy![]()
Date | Reported Short | High Price | Low Price | Closing Price | Trading Volume |
04/10/2022 | 113,784,258 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 8,002,430 |
19/09/2022 | 112,708,576 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 9,100,937 |