BrainChip + Nanose

uiux

Regular

BRAINCHIP INC. AND NANOSE MEDICAL SUCCESSFULLY DETECT COVID-19 IN EXHALED BREATH WITH FAST HIGH-ACCURACY RESULTS

BrainChip Holdings Ltd (ASX:BRN), a leading provider of ultra-low power high performance artificial intelligence technology, today announced progress in testing with the NaNose (Nano Artificial Nose) where patients’ exhaled breath samples were tested for COVID-19.

NaNose Medical technology, based on the artificial nose developed at the Technion Israel Institute of Technology, has the same sensitivity to minute quantities of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) as a dog’s nose. It has been tested by the Technion since 2017 to identify diseases including Parkinson’s, cancers, kidney failure, multiple sclerosis and infectious diseases such as COVID-19. NaNose Medical collected samples from 130 patients and sent nanomaterial sensor data to BrainChip’s Research Institute in Perth, Western Australia, which configured and trained its Akida™ neuromorphic processor to interpret the data using AI/ML. The system detected the instances of COVID-19 between a disease group and a healthy control group and Akida learned to recognize patterns of VOC biomarkers associated with an infection within seconds with a high level of accuracy in a minimal time frame. NaNose Medical is currently collecting samples from three primary worldwide locations and will work with BrainChip to evaluate the data.





---




Multiplexed Nanomaterial-Based Sensor Array for Detection of COVID-19 in Exhaled Breath

This article reports on a noninvasive approach in detecting and following-up individuals who are at-risk or have an existing COVID-19 infection, with a potential ability to serve as an epidemic control tool. The proposed method uses a developed breath device composed of a nanomaterial-based hybrid sensor array with multiplexed detection capabilities that can detect disease-specific biomarkers from exhaled breath, thus enabling rapid and accurate diagnosis. An exploratory clinical study with this approach was examined in Wuhan, China, during March 2020. The study cohort included 49 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 58 healthy controls, and 33 non-COVID lung infection controls. When applicable, positive COVID-19 patients were sampled twice: during the active disease and after recovery. Discriminant analysis of the obtained signals from the nanomaterial-based sensors achieved very good test discriminations between the different groups. The training and test set data exhibited respectively 94% and 76% accuracy in differentiating patients from controls as well as 90% and 95% accuracy in differentiating between patients with COVID-19 and patients with other lung infections. While further validation studies are needed, the results may serve as a base for technology that would lead to a reduction in the number of unneeded confirmatory tests and lower the burden on hospitals, while allowing individuals a screening solution that can be performed in PoC facilities. The proposed method can be considered as a platform that could be applied for any other disease infection with proper modifications to the artificial intelligence and would therefore be available to serve as a diagnostic tool in case of a new disease outbreak.


This article is directly referenced in the BRN slide:


1644624615354.png


1644624623232.png





Nanoscale Sensor Technologies for Disease Detection



Diagnosis and Classification of 17 Diseases from 1404 Subjects via Pattern Analysis of Exhaled Molecules


1644624913185.png



---


Device and method for rapid detection of viruses

Abstract
The invention proposes an approach utilizing novel and artificially intelligent hybrid sensor arrays with multiplexed detection capabilities for disease-specific biomarkers from the exhaled breath of a subject. The technology provides a rapid and highly accurate diagnosis in various COVID-19 infection and transmission scenarios.

The first dataset was collected with the first-generation device with singe use units that include the sensors of the invention. The dataset included subjects tested with the device at two sites: 35 samples from Northwell NY, and 31 samples from Shamir medical center IL. Each test file consisted of responses from duplicated sensor array, and therefore each test file was split into two sample files, based on the sensor sets. Some of the sensors failed to respond, and therefore datasets that included failed sensors were discarded. The total number of sample files that were analyzed after the error- prone samples were discarded is: Northwell - 35 sample files (representing 24 tested subjects - 17 positives, 7 negatives) and Shamir medical center - 31 sample files (representing 21 tested subjects - 14 positives, 7 negatives). The data was analyzed by Brainchip with a Spiking Neural Network, the adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set. The test set included 31 samples- 21 positives and 10 negatives from 21 tested subjects. Zero out of 21 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 100% sensitivity and 4 out of 10 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 40% specificity. The overall accuracy was 80.65% The second study was performed with the multiuse NaNose sensors installed in Sniffphone device. The dataset included 165 samples taken from 141 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital - 65 samples from 65 COVID-19 positive subjects and 100 samples from 76 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). A Linear discriminative analysis was performed. The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 37 samples - 8 positive and 29 negative samples from 27 tested subjects. Seven out of eight positive samples were identified correctly which represents 87.5% sensitivity, and 25 out of the 29 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 86.2% specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 86.5%.

The same data set was analyzed also by the SNN methodology. To make the SNN most efficient, 34 samples were discarded due to noise or improper vector dimensionality. Thus, the dataset included 131 samples taken from 126 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital- 62 samples from 62 COVID-19 positive subjects and 69 samples from 64 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 53 samples - 20 positive and 33 negative samples from 53 tested subjects. Nineteen out of 20 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 95% sensitivity and 29 out of 33 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 87.87 % specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 90.5%.


---



Israeli company develops 'breathalyzer' COVID-19 test with 98% accuracy

During its preliminary testing, which has still not been completed, the company has seen 98% accuracy in the use of the test, which takes just a few minutes to perform

With the company's "unique algorithm," it claims to be able to have an even higher level of sensitivity and specificity (98%). Such results are higher than existing commercial tests. The algorithm is one which is in standard practice approved both in Israel and around the world. These preliminary results could mean that the test is eligible for FDA approval.




Prince Charles meets with Israeli scientists at Technion University

Charles is honoring Churchill's memory by meeting Professor Haick, one of Israel's leading scientists of the modern age

"SniffPhone has an unparalleled advantage over traditional screening methods: The device is comfortable and painless to use, and provides a simple and cost-effective alternative for medical professionals," Technion University explained in a statement.

1644624669644.png




PROF. HOSSAM HAICK MET WITH MICROSOFT FOUNDER BILL GATES IN SOUTH AFRICA

1644625468310.png



---

Previous clinical trials with Nanose:



Cancer Diagnoses From Exhaled Breath With Na-nose



Study to Evaluate NA-NOSE for Monitoring and Detecting Recurrence in Early Stage Lung Cancer



Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions From Exhaled Breath and Saliva



Detection of Placenta Accreta Via Exhaled Women Breath



Electronic Nose for Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases Via Breath Samples



Applications of Nanotechnology in Multiple Sclerosis by Respiratory Samples (MS-NANOSE)



Application of Nanotechnology and Chemical Sensors for Diagnosis of Decompensated Heart Failure by Respiratory Samples



Detection and Identification of Preeclampsia Via Volatile Biomarkers (DIP)



Diagnosis of Common Oral Diseases by Signature Volatile Profiles



Breath Testing in Early and Late Larynx Cancer


---

News coverage:

Just breathe: Israeli-made Nano COVID breath test spots every carrier in trial
Prototype ‘breathalyser’ test for Covid-19 shows promise
Novel COVID-19 Breath Test Detects Disease With 92% Accuracy In Trial
Toward a coronavirus breathalyzer test
Israel's COVID-19 breathalyzer test prototype promises results in 30 seconds
New prototype device non-invasively detects COVID-19 in exhaled breath of infected patients
COVID-19 Coronavirus Breathalyzer Test Developed
Novel COVID-19 Breathalyzer Has Potential as Screening Tool
Technion researchers working on emergency projects to fight coronavirus
New breath test sniffs out Covid-19 in 30 seconds
Prince Charles heralds ‘Israeli geniuses maintaining entire structure of NHS’
Prince Charles meets with Israeli scientists at Technion University

---




 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 78 users

Dougie54

Regular
Is there anything new on this ? Or any updates on progress ?
 
Last edited:

Rayz

Member

BRAINCHIP INC. AND NANOSE MEDICAL SUCCESSFULLY DETECT COVID-19 IN EXHALED BREATH WITH FAST HIGH-ACCURACY RESULTS

BrainChip Holdings Ltd (ASX:BRN), a leading provider of ultra-low power high performance artificial intelligence technology, today announced progress in testing with the NaNose (Nano Artificial Nose) where patients’ exhaled breath samples were tested for COVID-19.

NaNose Medical technology, based on the artificial nose developed at the Technion Israel Institute of Technology, has the same sensitivity to minute quantities of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) as a dog’s nose. It has been tested by the Technion since 2017 to identify diseases including Parkinson’s, cancers, kidney failure, multiple sclerosis and infectious diseases such as COVID-19. NaNose Medical collected samples from 130 patients and sent nanomaterial sensor data to BrainChip’s Research Institute in Perth, Western Australia, which configured and trained its Akida™ neuromorphic processor to interpret the data using AI/ML. The system detected the instances of COVID-19 between a disease group and a healthy control group and Akida learned to recognize patterns of VOC biomarkers associated with an infection within seconds with a high level of accuracy in a minimal time frame. NaNose Medical is currently collecting samples from three primary worldwide locations and will work with BrainChip to evaluate the data.





---




Multiplexed Nanomaterial-Based Sensor Array for Detection of COVID-19 in Exhaled Breath

This article reports on a noninvasive approach in detecting and following-up individuals who are at-risk or have an existing COVID-19 infection, with a potential ability to serve as an epidemic control tool. The proposed method uses a developed breath device composed of a nanomaterial-based hybrid sensor array with multiplexed detection capabilities that can detect disease-specific biomarkers from exhaled breath, thus enabling rapid and accurate diagnosis. An exploratory clinical study with this approach was examined in Wuhan, China, during March 2020. The study cohort included 49 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 58 healthy controls, and 33 non-COVID lung infection controls. When applicable, positive COVID-19 patients were sampled twice: during the active disease and after recovery. Discriminant analysis of the obtained signals from the nanomaterial-based sensors achieved very good test discriminations between the different groups. The training and test set data exhibited respectively 94% and 76% accuracy in differentiating patients from controls as well as 90% and 95% accuracy in differentiating between patients with COVID-19 and patients with other lung infections. While further validation studies are needed, the results may serve as a base for technology that would lead to a reduction in the number of unneeded confirmatory tests and lower the burden on hospitals, while allowing individuals a screening solution that can be performed in PoC facilities. The proposed method can be considered as a platform that could be applied for any other disease infection with proper modifications to the artificial intelligence and would therefore be available to serve as a diagnostic tool in case of a new disease outbreak.


This article is directly referenced in the BRN slide:


View attachment 836

View attachment 837




Nanoscale Sensor Technologies for Disease Detection



Diagnosis and Classification of 17 Diseases from 1404 Subjects via Pattern Analysis of Exhaled Molecules


View attachment 839


---


Device and method for rapid detection of viruses

Abstract
The invention proposes an approach utilizing novel and artificially intelligent hybrid sensor arrays with multiplexed detection capabilities for disease-specific biomarkers from the exhaled breath of a subject. The technology provides a rapid and highly accurate diagnosis in various COVID-19 infection and transmission scenarios.

The first dataset was collected with the first-generation device with singe use units that include the sensors of the invention. The dataset included subjects tested with the device at two sites: 35 samples from Northwell NY, and 31 samples from Shamir medical center IL. Each test file consisted of responses from duplicated sensor array, and therefore each test file was split into two sample files, based on the sensor sets. Some of the sensors failed to respond, and therefore datasets that included failed sensors were discarded. The total number of sample files that were analyzed after the error- prone samples were discarded is: Northwell - 35 sample files (representing 24 tested subjects - 17 positives, 7 negatives) and Shamir medical center - 31 sample files (representing 21 tested subjects - 14 positives, 7 negatives). The data was analyzed by Brainchip with a Spiking Neural Network, the adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set. The test set included 31 samples- 21 positives and 10 negatives from 21 tested subjects. Zero out of 21 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 100% sensitivity and 4 out of 10 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 40% specificity. The overall accuracy was 80.65% The second study was performed with the multiuse NaNose sensors installed in Sniffphone device. The dataset included 165 samples taken from 141 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital - 65 samples from 65 COVID-19 positive subjects and 100 samples from 76 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). A Linear discriminative analysis was performed. The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 37 samples - 8 positive and 29 negative samples from 27 tested subjects. Seven out of eight positive samples were identified correctly which represents 87.5% sensitivity, and 25 out of the 29 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 86.2% specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 86.5%.

The same data set was analyzed also by the SNN methodology. To make the SNN most efficient, 34 samples were discarded due to noise or improper vector dimensionality. Thus, the dataset included 131 samples taken from 126 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital- 62 samples from 62 COVID-19 positive subjects and 69 samples from 64 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 53 samples - 20 positive and 33 negative samples from 53 tested subjects. Nineteen out of 20 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 95% sensitivity and 29 out of 33 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 87.87 % specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 90.5%.


---



Israeli company develops 'breathalyzer' COVID-19 test with 98% accuracy

During its preliminary testing, which has still not been completed, the company has seen 98% accuracy in the use of the test, which takes just a few minutes to perform

With the company's "unique algorithm," it claims to be able to have an even higher level of sensitivity and specificity (98%). Such results are higher than existing commercial tests. The algorithm is one which is in standard practice approved both in Israel and around the world. These preliminary results could mean that the test is eligible for FDA approval.




Prince Charles meets with Israeli scientists at Technion University

Charles is honoring Churchill's memory by meeting Professor Haick, one of Israel's leading scientists of the modern age

"SniffPhone has an unparalleled advantage over traditional screening methods: The device is comfortable and painless to use, and provides a simple and cost-effective alternative for medical professionals," Technion University explained in a statement.

View attachment 838



PROF. HOSSAM HAICK MET WITH MICROSOFT FOUNDER BILL GATES IN SOUTH AFRICA

View attachment 840


---

Previous clinical trials with Nanose:



Cancer Diagnoses From Exhaled Breath With Na-nose



Study to Evaluate NA-NOSE for Monitoring and Detecting Recurrence in Early Stage Lung Cancer



Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions From Exhaled Breath and Saliva



Detection of Placenta Accreta Via Exhaled Women Breath



Electronic Nose for Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases Via Breath Samples



Applications of Nanotechnology in Multiple Sclerosis by Respiratory Samples (MS-NANOSE)



Application of Nanotechnology and Chemical Sensors for Diagnosis of Decompensated Heart Failure by Respiratory Samples



Detection and Identification of Preeclampsia Via Volatile Biomarkers (DIP)



Diagnosis of Common Oral Diseases by Signature Volatile Profiles



Breath Testing in Early and Late Larynx Cancer


---

News coverage:

Just breathe: Israeli-made Nano COVID breath test spots every carrier in trial
Prototype ‘breathalyser’ test for Covid-19 shows promise
Novel COVID-19 Breath Test Detects Disease With 92% Accuracy In Trial
Toward a coronavirus breathalyzer test
Israel's COVID-19 breathalyzer test prototype promises results in 30 seconds
New prototype device non-invasively detects COVID-19 in exhaled breath of infected patients
COVID-19 Coronavirus Breathalyzer Test Developed
Novel COVID-19 Breathalyzer Has Potential as Screening Tool
Technion researchers working on emergency projects to fight coronavirus
New breath test sniffs out Covid-19 in 30 seconds
Prince Charles heralds ‘Israeli geniuses maintaining entire structure of NHS’
Prince Charles meets with Israeli scientists at Technion University

---





Great full coverage very commendable research
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18 users

BRAINCHIP INC. AND NANOSE MEDICAL SUCCESSFULLY DETECT COVID-19 IN EXHALED BREATH WITH FAST HIGH-ACCURACY RESULTS

BrainChip Holdings Ltd (ASX:BRN), a leading provider of ultra-low power high performance artificial intelligence technology, today announced progress in testing with the NaNose (Nano Artificial Nose) where patients’ exhaled breath samples were tested for COVID-19.

NaNose Medical technology, based on the artificial nose developed at the Technion Israel Institute of Technology, has the same sensitivity to minute quantities of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) as a dog’s nose. It has been tested by the Technion since 2017 to identify diseases including Parkinson’s, cancers, kidney failure, multiple sclerosis and infectious diseases such as COVID-19. NaNose Medical collected samples from 130 patients and sent nanomaterial sensor data to BrainChip’s Research Institute in Perth, Western Australia, which configured and trained its Akida™ neuromorphic processor to interpret the data using AI/ML. The system detected the instances of COVID-19 between a disease group and a healthy control group and Akida learned to recognize patterns of VOC biomarkers associated with an infection within seconds with a high level of accuracy in a minimal time frame. NaNose Medical is currently collecting samples from three primary worldwide locations and will work with BrainChip to evaluate the data.





---




Multiplexed Nanomaterial-Based Sensor Array for Detection of COVID-19 in Exhaled Breath

This article reports on a noninvasive approach in detecting and following-up individuals who are at-risk or have an existing COVID-19 infection, with a potential ability to serve as an epidemic control tool. The proposed method uses a developed breath device composed of a nanomaterial-based hybrid sensor array with multiplexed detection capabilities that can detect disease-specific biomarkers from exhaled breath, thus enabling rapid and accurate diagnosis. An exploratory clinical study with this approach was examined in Wuhan, China, during March 2020. The study cohort included 49 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 58 healthy controls, and 33 non-COVID lung infection controls. When applicable, positive COVID-19 patients were sampled twice: during the active disease and after recovery. Discriminant analysis of the obtained signals from the nanomaterial-based sensors achieved very good test discriminations between the different groups. The training and test set data exhibited respectively 94% and 76% accuracy in differentiating patients from controls as well as 90% and 95% accuracy in differentiating between patients with COVID-19 and patients with other lung infections. While further validation studies are needed, the results may serve as a base for technology that would lead to a reduction in the number of unneeded confirmatory tests and lower the burden on hospitals, while allowing individuals a screening solution that can be performed in PoC facilities. The proposed method can be considered as a platform that could be applied for any other disease infection with proper modifications to the artificial intelligence and would therefore be available to serve as a diagnostic tool in case of a new disease outbreak.


This article is directly referenced in the BRN slide:


View attachment 836

View attachment 837




Nanoscale Sensor Technologies for Disease Detection



Diagnosis and Classification of 17 Diseases from 1404 Subjects via Pattern Analysis of Exhaled Molecules


View attachment 839


---


Device and method for rapid detection of viruses

Abstract
The invention proposes an approach utilizing novel and artificially intelligent hybrid sensor arrays with multiplexed detection capabilities for disease-specific biomarkers from the exhaled breath of a subject. The technology provides a rapid and highly accurate diagnosis in various COVID-19 infection and transmission scenarios.

The first dataset was collected with the first-generation device with singe use units that include the sensors of the invention. The dataset included subjects tested with the device at two sites: 35 samples from Northwell NY, and 31 samples from Shamir medical center IL. Each test file consisted of responses from duplicated sensor array, and therefore each test file was split into two sample files, based on the sensor sets. Some of the sensors failed to respond, and therefore datasets that included failed sensors were discarded. The total number of sample files that were analyzed after the error- prone samples were discarded is: Northwell - 35 sample files (representing 24 tested subjects - 17 positives, 7 negatives) and Shamir medical center - 31 sample files (representing 21 tested subjects - 14 positives, 7 negatives). The data was analyzed by Brainchip with a Spiking Neural Network, the adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set. The test set included 31 samples- 21 positives and 10 negatives from 21 tested subjects. Zero out of 21 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 100% sensitivity and 4 out of 10 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 40% specificity. The overall accuracy was 80.65% The second study was performed with the multiuse NaNose sensors installed in Sniffphone device. The dataset included 165 samples taken from 141 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital - 65 samples from 65 COVID-19 positive subjects and 100 samples from 76 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). A Linear discriminative analysis was performed. The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 37 samples - 8 positive and 29 negative samples from 27 tested subjects. Seven out of eight positive samples were identified correctly which represents 87.5% sensitivity, and 25 out of the 29 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 86.2% specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 86.5%.

The same data set was analyzed also by the SNN methodology. To make the SNN most efficient, 34 samples were discarded due to noise or improper vector dimensionality. Thus, the dataset included 131 samples taken from 126 subjects tested with Sniffphone device at Zayed Military Hospital- 62 samples from 62 COVID-19 positive subjects and 69 samples from 64 COVID-19 negative subjects (Several negative subjects were sampled two or three times). The adjacent confusion matrix shows the results on the test set that that was completely blind to the training and validation of the model. The test set included 53 samples - 20 positive and 33 negative samples from 53 tested subjects. Nineteen out of 20 positive samples were identified correctly which represents 95% sensitivity and 29 out of 33 negative samples were identified correctly which represents 87.87 % specificity. The overall accuracy was therefore 90.5%.


---



Israeli company develops 'breathalyzer' COVID-19 test with 98% accuracy

During its preliminary testing, which has still not been completed, the company has seen 98% accuracy in the use of the test, which takes just a few minutes to perform

With the company's "unique algorithm," it claims to be able to have an even higher level of sensitivity and specificity (98%). Such results are higher than existing commercial tests. The algorithm is one which is in standard practice approved both in Israel and around the world. These preliminary results could mean that the test is eligible for FDA approval.




Prince Charles meets with Israeli scientists at Technion University

Charles is honoring Churchill's memory by meeting Professor Haick, one of Israel's leading scientists of the modern age

"SniffPhone has an unparalleled advantage over traditional screening methods: The device is comfortable and painless to use, and provides a simple and cost-effective alternative for medical professionals," Technion University explained in a statement.

View attachment 838



PROF. HOSSAM HAICK MET WITH MICROSOFT FOUNDER BILL GATES IN SOUTH AFRICA

View attachment 840


---

Previous clinical trials with Nanose:



Cancer Diagnoses From Exhaled Breath With Na-nose



Study to Evaluate NA-NOSE for Monitoring and Detecting Recurrence in Early Stage Lung Cancer



Diagnosis of Gastric Lesions From Exhaled Breath and Saliva



Detection of Placenta Accreta Via Exhaled Women Breath



Electronic Nose for Diagnosis of Neurodegenerative Diseases Via Breath Samples



Applications of Nanotechnology in Multiple Sclerosis by Respiratory Samples (MS-NANOSE)



Application of Nanotechnology and Chemical Sensors for Diagnosis of Decompensated Heart Failure by Respiratory Samples



Detection and Identification of Preeclampsia Via Volatile Biomarkers (DIP)



Diagnosis of Common Oral Diseases by Signature Volatile Profiles



Breath Testing in Early and Late Larynx Cancer


---

News coverage:

Just breathe: Israeli-made Nano COVID breath test spots every carrier in trial
Prototype ‘breathalyser’ test for Covid-19 shows promise
Novel COVID-19 Breath Test Detects Disease With 92% Accuracy In Trial
Toward a coronavirus breathalyzer test
Israel's COVID-19 breathalyzer test prototype promises results in 30 seconds
New prototype device non-invasively detects COVID-19 in exhaled breath of infected patients
COVID-19 Coronavirus Breathalyzer Test Developed
Novel COVID-19 Breathalyzer Has Potential as Screening Tool
Technion researchers working on emergency projects to fight coronavirus
New breath test sniffs out Covid-19 in 30 seconds
Prince Charles heralds ‘Israeli geniuses maintaining entire structure of NHS’
Prince Charles meets with Israeli scientists at Technion University

---





This is fantastic! I never get tired of reading this. One of the prime reasons I initially invested in Brainchip! This will be a global medical game changer once approved!

Beneficial AI: benefiting consumers, beneficial to me!

Thanks and very much appreciated Uiux!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23 users

uiux

Regular
Is there anything new on this ? Or any updates on progress ?

Last we have heard was Sean's latest interview commenting on prototypes detecting covid

Previous to that was the discovery of the nanose patent featuring Akida performance details within
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 20 users

Dougie54

Regular
Last we have heard was Sean's latest interview commenting on prototypes detecting covid

Previous to that was the discovery of the nanose patent featuring Akida performance details within
Cheers uiux,it just seems to have gone a bit flat ,there was a lot of hype then “bleh”lots in media about RAT‘s and other quick testers but not this.
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
90 percent accuracy for Akida.

What is the accuracy of the RATS we are all currently using?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Dougie54

Regular
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Deet

Emerged
Cheers uiux,it just seems to have gone a bit flat ,there was a lot of hype then “bleh”lots in media about RAT‘s and other quick testers but not this.
Its a long and rigorous process to get approvals in the medical sector, yet alone for something completely new. On the positive, any competitor will face the same tough process and they would need to meet a standard already established by Akita.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

BaconLover

Founding Member
Its a long and rigorous process to get approvals in the medical sector, yet alone for something completely new. On the positive, any competitor will face the same tough process and they would need to meet a standard already established by Akita.
They brought out the vaccines within a few months, I am sure Nanose has been in the works for a lot longer than that.
For injecting something into the body, they fast tracked but for a non invasive, proven tech, it takes longer time frame for approvals.

I am honestly not sure what's going on here.

And I hope I haven't opened a can of worms here. (I don't care whether you are for or against vax, please be respectful, I am simply making a point of the hypocrisy of government bodies when it comes to benefitting own pockets, I am not suggesting/recommending anyone regarding their choices for or against vaccines)
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 30 users

Deet

Emerged
They brought out the vaccines within a few months, I am sure Nanose has been in the works for a lot longer than that.
For injecting something into the body, they fast tracked but for a non invasive, proven tech, it takes longer time frame for approvals.

I am honestly not sure what's going on here.

And I hope I haven't opened a can of worms here. (I don't care whether you are for or against vax, please be respectful, I am simply making a point of the hypocrisy of government bodies when it comes to benefitting own pockets, I am not suggesting/recommending anyone regarding their choices for or against vaccines)
I understand what you're saying. The ARTG (Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods) is very slow. The equivalent in the US is the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and they seem to work quicker. Just hope that they will develop and test in the US first before coming to Oz ;)
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 11 users

Dougie54

Regular
They brought out the vaccines within a few months, I am sure Nanose has been in the works for a lot longer than that.
For injecting something into the body, they fast tracked but for a non invasive, proven tech, it takes longer time frame for approvals.

I am honestly not sure what's going on here.

And I hope I haven't opened a can of worms here. (I don't care whether you are for or against vax, please be respectful, I am simply making a point of the hypocrisy of government bodies when it comes to benefitting own pockets, I am not suggesting/recommending anyone regarding their choices for or against vaccines)
I think you are spot on,while the government is making so much from vaccines(tax) and the graft and corruption that has gone on to get these in place so quick we will be waiting and waiting !!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

plugster

Emerged
90 percent accuracy for Akida.

What is the accuracy of the RATS we are all currently using?
I thought they were supposed to be around 90% as well, but I would suggest there is a hidden benefit/accuracy - it's less likely that you can exhale incorrectly as opposed to whether or not the majority are extracting the sample correctly for RATs. I suspect we're getting a lot of false negatives because of the process of taking the test and people are doing it the "easy way".

Just exhaling in the direction of the device is much more likely to have consistent results.

I'd also rather stand in line to exhale onto a device rather than have someone shove a swab up my nose when I'm getting off a 10 hour flight!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 15 users
Just on the accuracy thing for AKIDA it has been published by Brainchip that working with Nanose initially it was 94% having increased to 95% to 98%. I am not sure where the 90% accuracy is coming from.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 29 users

Worker122

Regular
This says a MUST report by May.
7684F68D-633A-4CC0-ACC3-D31A4ED7B9F2.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users

grambe

Emerged
This says a MUST report by May. View attachment 1014
Good find Worker although the document title refers to DiaNose. Forgive me if I’m wrong but is this a competitor to Nanose ? Either way would good, huge potential in this area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Worker122

Regular
BFD15829-F6D3-41D1-8127-820873E8E808.png
Good find Worker although the document title refers to DiaNose. Forgive me if I’m wrong but is this a competitor to Nanose ? Either way would good, huge potential in this area.
Interesting Grambe, here is a screen shot of where I started. Title NaNose, same tracking number.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

grambe

Emerged
Interesting Grambe, here is a screen shot of where I started. Title NaNose, same tracking number.
That’s great thanks Worker….. couldn’t find anything on the internet regarding DiaNose …bit of a mystery
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Worker122

Regular
FC446BE9-ADAC-464C-A0AB-DE1203EA7D99.png
)
That’s great thanks Worker….. couldn’t find anything on the internet regarding DiaNose …bit of a mystery
Back again.
It seems to me that NaNose is the over arching controller and sponsor to Dianose?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

rgupta

Regular
They brought out the vaccines within a few months, I am sure Nanose has been in the works for a lot longer than that.
For injecting something into the body, they fast tracked but for a non invasive, proven tech, it takes longer time frame for approvals.

I am honestly not sure what's going on here.

And I hope I haven't opened a can of worms here. (I don't care whether you are for or against vax, please be respectful, I am simply making a point of the hypocrisy of government bodies when it comes to benefitting own pockets, I am not suggesting/recommending anyone regarding their choices for or against vaccines)
You are assuming everything works in fairness. Once you remove that assumption then onwards everything is possible in this world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Top Bottom