AVZ Discussion 2022

tolate

Member
Well, the time has come.

Since the much needed arrival of Zeebot to restore some value to this discussion doesn’t appear to be happening any time soon I have sent my request to Mr W. Nut

I have been reading daily since my investment (1M+ if anyone cares) in late 2017, first on the crapper and then since on TSE.

Countless shareholders who have been caught up in this mess and are enduring all manner of stresses manage to find some solace and moral support from this thread as well as some excellent and well researched insight.

Sadly, that was in the past, the discussion has been reduced to pure nonsense by the parasite that is the toilet.

How anyone can lack any semblance of compassion for the 21,000 shareholders who are on the wrong end of this beggars belief.

Toilet, whatever you get in return for your efforts I do hope it is worth it, you don’t deserve to sleep at night.

IMO…
You said...HAVE you taken your concerns up with AVZ or NIGEL...!...:unsure::unsure::unsure::unsure::unsure::unsure:
Countless shareholders who have been caught up in this mess and are enduring all manner of stresses manage to find some solace and moral support from this thread as well as some excellent and well researched insight.
 

Remark

Top 20
Human refuge
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

cruiser51

Top 20
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 6 users

tolate

Member
Published on October 8, 2025

Listen to Article​

President Donald Trump’s pursuit of peace and critical minerals deals in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) may be about to face a significant self-imposed obstacle. The Trump administration is strongly considering effectively removing sanctions on mining magnate Dan Gertler despite sanctioning him under a flagship global anti-corruption program during President Donald Trump’s first term. The move to give him a license to operate again despite the sanctions would significantly undermine U.S. efforts to broker peace in the DRC and access critical minerals from Congolese soil. After six months of deal making and a possible upcoming White House visit from Congolese and Rwandan presidents this fall, the entire process is being put at risk by this potential move, being debated now within the administration. Importantly, it would put U.S. companies at serious risk.
""""""""""""""Some dont approve to the US actions...imo"""""'''''
 

Remark

Top 20
Human?
It's just a piece of uninvited shit!
A walking ad for contraception
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

tolate

Member
1760076878768.png
1760076950200.png

Just trying to work out the D H...LMAO...:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 

tolate

Member
View attachment 91879 View attachment 91880
Just trying to work out the D H...LMAO...:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Something i came across in the MEDIA outlets...imo..

In his speech at the United Nations (U.N.), President Trump claimed (no fewer than four times) that he has “ended seven unendable wars.” This assertion, which he began repeating over the summer, is not only a gross exaggeration: it also betrays a flawed understanding of peace itself.
Under the Trump administration, peace deals have been treated as an opportunity to secure resources and real estate. Recent agreements between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, and between Armenia and Azerbaijan, illustrate this “resources-for-peace” approach. Both deals are fundamentally transactional. But by prioritizing American economic interests and quick fixes over a sustainable peace, they promise to yield fragile outcomes at best.

DRC-Rwanda Peace Agreement

Trump claims that his administration’s mediation between the DRC and Rwanda “stopped”’ the conflict in DRC and yet, fighting continues unabated. The outcome was predictable.
"""" The peace agreement, signed in June, had more to do with securing U.S. access to Congolese minerals than finding a recipe for durable peace."""""""'
MAGA is for the GULLIBLE....IMO
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Top Bottom