AVZ Discussion 2022

[Spikerama]

Anyone suggesting a low ball offer as acceptable (imo) be it here (TSE), on X, or HC for that matter, is a traitor to the cause; the message needs to stay on point, any offer below Fair Compensation for all AVZ investors is unacceptable, end of. Sure, if it's just to get the ball rolling fine, however, stop telling us all how tough it is at this time for the lith sector, no one gives a fg toss, that its tough at this time, all potential buyers will be buying this for the future, the next 30+ years!

Exactly this.

That's why I reckon anyone quoting prices... any price (apart from the meme of $12) is a traitor because all you are doing is sentiment signaling; which is only helpful to a buyer testing for softness. Same as downward pressure in trading. Price testing basically. Weak hands. All that shit. Fuck, you guys should know all this better than me.

Point being, if you are ok will a shit outcome as in cents in a dollar, why do you have to call it from the roof tops or spooge it all over the social apps? The truthful answer is you don't. You just have to shut up and wait and see how low it turns out. Right?

So then, what's the real reason you are shopping out lowball prices?

 

[Samus]

$1 aud plus. Stop with the 40c talk. None of the large holders pushing for 40c.

Stop with the fucking $1 talk!

MINIMUM!

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

Exactly this.

That's why I reckon anyone quoting prices (apart from the meme of $12) is a traitor because all you are doing is sentiment signaling; which is only helpful to a buyer testing for softness. Same as downward pressure on trading. Price testing basically. Weak hands. All that shit. Fuck you guys should know all this better than me.

Point being, if you are ok will a shit outcome as in cents in a dollar, why do you have to call it from the roof tops or spooge it all over the social apps? The truthful answer is you don't. You just have to shut up and wait and see how low it turns out.

$12 can buy many $2 parties

 

[tonster66]

$12 it is

 

[Spikerama]

$12 can buy many $2 parties

It can also buy many $2 panties.

 

[Flight996]

Think it's not happening?...think again.

Ref: https://www.africaintelligence.com/...-contract,110446801-bre?cxt=PUB&did=110249983

Cheers
F

 

[Skar]

Think it's not happening?...think again.

View attachment 84314
Ref: https://www.africaintelligence.com/central-africa/2025/05/12/blackwater-s-erik-prince-hiring-former-french-soldiers-for-security-contract,110446801-bre?cxt=PUB&did=110249983

Cheers
F

Gee.... I wonder if any other nations will jump on board the US bandwagon of trying to derisk mineral investment to compete with China...

G7 Cooperation to De-Risk Minerals Investments in the Global South

The G7 must act decisively on critical minerals security at this year’s summit. Establishing a dedicated G7 investment fund could unlock high-priority projects, de-risk investments, and catalyze private capital—strengthening supply chains and reducing key vulnerabilities.

www.csis.org

 

[Spikerama]

They're getting it with their 'security for minerals' deal, so that's a mute point once its signed. They can cry about the risk all they like, but it's a bs ruse when they're waiting for a 'security for minerals' deal to be implemented before handing over the cash, so if they dont offer 'fair value' and 'partial compensation' (their words, not ours) then it's no deal. They can go take advantage of the next mug

Moot point, not "mute point"

 

[PhatCatz]

If the sub 5 bucks calls are true. it will be a bitter pill to swallow getting reamed by so called allies. China we could understand. It’s how they operate. But from the US. Cuts deep man.

Albo and Penny won’t say shit. Yet be the first with hands out collecting tax when/if this ever sells.

 

[ptlas]

that too

I wish that the trolls would make a few more mute points.

 

[protoje]

Exactly this.

That's why I reckon anyone quoting prices... any price (apart from the meme of $12) is a traitor because all you are doing is sentiment signaling; which is only helpful to a buyer testing for softness. Same as downward pressure on trading. Price testing basically. Weak hands. All that shit. Fuck you guys should know all this better than me.

Point being, if you are ok will a shit outcome as in cents in a dollar, why do you have to call it from the roof tops or spooge it all over the social apps? The truthful answer is you don't. You just have to shut up and wait and see how low it turns out. Right?

So then, what's the real reason you are shopping out lowball prices?

Absolutely fucking spot on - and the other thing is, sentiment is so easy to measure now with all this AI tech. It’s out of our hands so just shut the fk up everyone and let Nigel do his job. We all want $12. That’s all anyone should be posting.

 

[LEFOOL]

I love you for this Spike

 

[Frank]

Totally agree here on ICSID

The whole legal avenue must continue

Proving up title, putting some metrics around the numbers/value, powerful, powerful, powerful bargaining chip

Absolutely correct negotiations can take place and deals can be made any time up to, during and after ICSID

ICSID is the one thing that can bring forward and help facilitate a meaningful and fair deal

Management dropping the legals would be a massive commercial blunder

It is only when everything is done and dusted and appropriate funds firmly in all shareholders bank accounts that the legal switch gets turned off

Anything else is a complete folly

Ditto Bro, I concur, Wise words indeed from our Wino

 

[Frank]

Stop with the fucking $1 talk!
View attachment 84313

MINIMUM!

Fyi, Did you see this BS on X

https://x.com/zed_kelly_/status/1921744612353335327

 

[j.l]

Fyi, Did you see this BS on X

View attachment 84324

https://x.com/zed_kelly_/status/1921744612353335327

View attachment 84325

View attachment 84327

View attachment 84326

 

[Thaz]

Exactly this.

That's why I reckon anyone quoting prices... any price (apart from the meme of $12) is a traitor because all you are doing is sentiment signaling; which is only helpful to a buyer testing for softness. Same as downward pressure in trading. Price testing basically. Weak hands. All that shit. Fuck, you guys should know all this better than me.

Point being, if you are ok will a shit outcome as in cents in a dollar, why do you have to call it from the roof tops or spooge it all over the social apps? The truthful answer is you don't. You just have to shut up and wait and see how low it turns out. Right?

So then, what's the real reason you are shopping out lowball prices?

Exactly. $50.

 

[Chase]

They're getting it with their 'security for minerals' deal, so that's a moot point once its signed. They can cry about the risk all they like, but it's a bs ruse when they're waiting for a 'security for minerals' deal to be implemented before handing over the cash, so if they dont offer 'fair value' and 'partial compensation' (their words, not ours) then it's no deal. They can go take advantage of the next mug

Exactly

 

[ptlas]

Amovatio on the crapper:

Your point about the net worth of Bezoz, Gates and Bloomberg is precisely the point I was suggesting why AVZ should be looking at all options to secure the best possible price for Shareholders rather than simply the first group to put an offer forward.

The US has hardly been quiet about the need for critical minerals and rare earths and it will do nearly anything to support countries that will grant it access to these resources that doesn't include China in the supply chain.


I don’t feel the need to discuss price any further as I was buoyed by the announcement released by AVZ that it had in the discussions concerning US investment in the DRC, agreed to a non binding framework with Ko Bold Metals for the purchase of AVZ’s interest in the Manono project. I am certain AVZ is strongly aware of all shareholders interests and concerns, that is why it is considering all avenues to explore a resolution of the current issues.

Without access to these resources from Africa the electronics industry in the US was going to experience a supply shortage in critical and rare earth components. Kobold Metals Company decision to look at purchasing AVZ’s interest in the Manono Project is also very clear because without a balanced supply chain, the future was not looking good for the price of electronics equipment. US investment now holds the key to unlocking the potential to reducing this risk in the supply chain by guaranteeing access to these resources without China influence.

Yes, we have no ownership of land only a title over the tenement of Manono. But our intellectual property is significant. This is definitely something Bill Gates knows a lot about particularly how people pay for licensing.. Bill Gates and his mates are desperate to secure these resources from Africa.

AVZ went to Africa with Shareholder investment on a mission of exploration and discovery.What we uncovered through our exploration works was a behemoth in resources of every kind. If I can draw an analogy in history…. the discovery of Lithium in Africa would be similar to Gold being discovered in Australia back in the 1850's, such will be the impact of mining in the prosperity of the African people.

AVZ is conscious of the broader geopolitical challenges in achieving a resolution in relation to the Manono Project, however it appreciates the opportunity that has emerged to explore a resolution of the current issues relating to the Manono Project, which it will continue to pursue in a constructive and open manner in the best interests of its shareholders and other key stakeholders, including Suzhou CATH Energy Technologies.This to me is not a statement about selling out investors but one of achieving best outcomes for everyone concerned.

I am absolutely certain the Americans will look after their investment interests moving forward with the highest security and agree to pay a fair value to purchase our interests when the peace deal has been signed between the DRC and Rwanda.

In response to a few posts, I have read I am definitely not an Agent and most certainly haven’t lost my mind.I want a resolution to the current issues as much as everyone else that has held shares across the journey.

The Legal process AVZ has started was not the investor crusade we set out for but as shareholders I am sure most are grateful to our Management team and DLA piper Lawyers for their diligence to protect our investment against those that sought to send us broke. Like you I am confident our team will end up with a favourable outcome now that we have solid interest from wealthy western constituents.

Good luck to All and hope someone kicks off the AVZ Investor party to celebrate the resolution when this is all behind us.

 

[Samus]

Honestly !

https://x.com/fastandfiry/status/1921550255751049714

 

[Rechnerhand]

Honestly !

https://x.com/fastandfiry/status/1921550255751049714

View attachment 84332 View attachment 84331

Indeed we are not in the same boat and when we are sitting in different roles/functions there ... there will be some boys and girls who not just write about a fair value but will agree or disagree to an offer ... and their GO or NOGO is then binding for the rest of the boat.