Carlos Danger
Top 20
I haven't chimed in for a few weeks, but I can confirm the following:
1. The various social media accounts on X/Twitter are doing a great job spreading propaganda so convincing that some of you loyal positive posters are now doubting yourselves.
2. The CAMI portal cadastre site is not to be taken seriously, the idiot doing changes in backend of the database is a bribed puppet who has been told to make it appear that AVZ has lost its rights to 13359 and it's separated. This is NOT OFFICIAL nor a trusted source.
3. AVZ only very recently had discussions with THE PRESIDENT OF THE DRC and are making headway regarding a MoU to move forward to issue the ML.
4. Cominere posting videos of work being done at Mpiana is not Cominere! It can't be confirmed if it's AVZ power old footage or another 3rd party.
5. MMGA are having meetings with their cronies, they are not meeting AVZ BOD staff, the president, the MOM or anyone in a decision making position regarding the future of AVZ. They are just the equivalent of your belly button fluff.
Do any of you think that AVZ will simply be stripped of their resource this late in the game with pending and active ICC and ICSID cases ?
You really think Zijin and Cominere can just drive their tractors in to the Northern tenement and start cutting holes and scooping spod out the ground?
People need to trust the legal process and wait for AVZ to push out an announcement.
CALM THE HELL DOWN EVERYONE!
There is a clear distinction between AVZ and Dathcom's good legal titles and the legal situation within the DRCGOAT you need to post more.
My favourite part was:
Do any of you think that AVZ will simply be stripped of their resource this late in the game with pending and active ICC and ICSID cases
A good example is the Dathomir 15% which we have good legal title to but don't currently own on the RCCM within the DRC due to multiple court cases that Cong won. I did read through the decisions and the tldr is they were criminal cases dealing with the validity of the creation of the share certificates not a decision on the merits of Cong's claims to the termination per se. The judge repeatedly recognises the need for this matter to be heard by an 'arbitral judge'.
For the PR renewal in Cominiere's name CAMI are following the MoM's decree. And I suspect we are about to see another one for the partition of the north. She has repeatedly backed Cominiere's claims since the beginning of this year and I see no indication that has changed. If she wanted to give us back the tenement she could have. She is the one with authority not Cominiere.
Or do you have a reason to think the PR renewal decree is also not to be taken seriously?