Only if it also includes your avatarWill the AGM include this slide?
![]()
you are correct - i just use ZJ because its easier than Jin Cheng... they are the same.Isn't the ICC case currently at hand between Jin Cheng and AVZI?
Zijin did not actually bring this case to arbitration.......Jin Cheng did
And isn't that specifically the crux of the jurisdictional arguement from AVZI to get it thrown out?
ie That Jin Cheng cannot bring this case to arbitration as it is NOT a partner in the Dathcom JV
If AVZI gets the result it hopes for and thinks it should all that happens here is Jin Cheng is told by the ICC "Sorry guys fuck off....this has nothing to do with you as you are not part of the Dathcom JV".......NEXT!
Or am I missing something?....
"It should be noted that this does not finally determine whether the sale of shares from Cominière to Jin Cheng was effective, which will remain to be determined in separate proceedings". AVZ Minerals .Isn't the ICC case currently at hand between Jin Cheng and AVZI?
Zijin did not actually bring this case to arbitration.......Jin Cheng did
And isn't that specifically the crux of the jurisdictional arguement from AVZI to get it thrown out?
ie That Jin Cheng cannot bring this case to arbitration as it is NOT a partner in the Dathcom JV
If AVZI gets the result it hopes for and thinks it should all that happens here is Jin Cheng is told by the ICC "Sorry guys fuck off....this has nothing to do with you as you are not part of the Dathcom JV".......NEXT!
Or am I missing something?....
Isn't the ICC case currently at hand between Jin Cheng and AVZI?
Zijin did not actually bring this case to arbitration.......Jin Cheng did
And isn't that specifically the crux of the jurisdictional arguement from AVZI to get it thrown out?
ie That Jin Cheng cannot bring this case to arbitration as it is NOT a partner in the Dathcom JV
If AVZI gets the result it hopes for and thinks it should all that happens here is Jin Cheng is told by the ICC "Sorry guys fuck off....this has nothing to do with you as you are not part of the Dathcom JV".......NEXT!
Or am I missing something?....
you are correct - i just use ZJ because its easier than Jin Cheng... they are the same.
ie That Jin Cheng cannot bring this case to arbitration as it is NOT a partner in the Dathcom JV - while this is the gist of the issue, there is a subtle difference to remember, we are arguing that the ICC does not have jurisdiction because of the above. Burden of proof in this instance is more on ZJ i think.
I use Zijin because they are the controlling company. Just like I use AVZ instead of AVZI."It should be noted that this does not finally determine whether the sale of shares from Cominière to Jin Cheng was effective, which will remain to be determined in separate proceedings". AVZ Minerals .
At what point does Nigel lock in ICSID ? Must be getting very close . They will just continue to f--k us around .
Those notes were bang on from my memory as well, especially the part about the ML isn't contingent on any of the ICC outcomes and that we have been in high level discussions with government and are confident for a speedy result...The AGM was in Perth and the notes are pretty much spot on from my memory of being there.
I am sure @Scoota30 and @tonster66 would agree.
Yep, agreeThe AGM was in Perth and the notes are pretty much spot on from my memory of being there.
I am sure @Scoota30 and @tonster66 would agree.
Struggle to comprehend how witnesses can have an impact on the decision? Surely it comes down to following due process and appropriate documentation. Waiting with anticipation for 9card to post chairman's statement if possible as I doubt AVZ would find the time to feed the mushrooms. Interesting week ahead.
Surely cannot be a real profile for CKK. The dude has been rambling desperately for the last 2 days.Old mate CKK's comments on X (who some believe to be a fake account, but given his antics I think is probably legit) suggests that he did deliver testimony. Looking forward to seeing the outcome, should point the path forward. Glad to hear Zijin showed up, I actually kind of expected they might pull out last minute like I wish I had done with my last girlfriend.
View attachment 46569
@9cardomaha would love to see the transcript.Is the chairmans statement secret? Or insider knowledge? Or is this common post arbitration to have it posted?
I think he spoke in the third person recently on a tweet...I was thinking the profile is one of his lackeys/drinking buddies in the infamous clip.L
Surely cannot be a real profile for CKK. The dude has been rambling desperately for the last 2 days.
Did you see his old interview on that TV show, or his efforts on the mike at the recent conference? Rambling desperately is CKK's forte! Reading all his tweets the positions he puts forward are right in line with Cominiere, and has some semi-insider type information on their approach. Possibile that its just a very well researched troll or one of his lackeys, but my belief is that it is our unhinged friend Celestine himself. I guess it might be a good sign that he seems to be falling apart more and more as time goes on.L
Surely cannot be a real profile for CKK. The dude has been rambling desperately for the last 2 days.
Hey Bags, we really do love and appreciate all that you have to contribute on here. No intention of stirring the mud. Reasonable to be weary of bad apples on TSE, but the vast majority of us, including me think you're a hero.Fuck off you pair of stirrers![]()
Hey Bags, we really do love and appreciate all that you have to contribute on here. No intention of stirring the mud. Reasonable to be weary of bad apples on TSE, but the vast majority of us, including me think you're a hero.