AVZ Discussion 2022

Can someone please point at the at relevant section of the mining code, which states that the lease applicant must have harmonious and healthy cooperation between the stakeholders of that entity as a precondition for development.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 22 users

wombat74

Top 20
  • Fire
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

JNRB

Regular
I can not know who will get it. MMCS did not know that AVZ will get it. They fight against everything possible in the JV agreement until they build their construct to have a feeling of a legal basis.
Our decrees got canceled with this reasons:

-ongoing disagreements, conflicts and differences between the shareholders
that have stalled the development of the Manono Project and the resulting
deadlock prevents the State from benefiting from the development of PE
13359.

-requirement for a harmonious and healthy cooperation between the
shareholders of Dathcom as a precondition to progress the development of
the Manono Project


Do you believe they give us a new decree? Nothing have changed still cominere and zijin fighting agaist us. and now fighting against the complete JV. What do you believe will happen? The MoM dont even think its necessary to inform us. Thats not any type of a good relationship with the government. AVZ might be have legal stand, but bro the drc dont care about it. Look in what situation we are. MoP transfer 15% to zijin 5% to MMCS, they stolen the nothern part and want to give it to AJN and now our decree got canceled to get a ML. In this Moment AJN present the nothern part to other investors, in my view it dont look like the MoM told them you have no chance to get it after I cancel the decree. Instead our presentation is canceled. What do you think will coming next? they want to get that project online, but they dont care if we are part of it. We are not in a disney movie with a perfect ending after all the shit.

You're reading things into it that aren't there.

The items you've listed are not stated as the reason for cancelling the decrees.

They are simply matters that are acknowledged in whatever statement was given with the decree.
So unless you've got a copy of the full decree that you haven't shared, you are misinterpreting or misconstruing the information that has actually thus far been presented to us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

TDITD

Top 20
CAMi in the form of JFM appeared intent to not only allow it, but push for it with the intent to funnel it to AJN. I sure as heck hope we've got some documentary evidence indicating CAMI told us we'd have to split the tenement because FT wanted that. Just tell me it wasn't on an unrecorded Zoom or phone call.
Well at least that’s one thing our board have been good with, so surely we have that up our sleeve.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

JNRB

Regular
You're reading things into it that aren't there.

The items you've listed are not stated as the reason for cancelling the decrees.

They are simply matters that are acknowledged in whatever statement was given with the decree.
So unless you've got a copy of the full decree that you haven't shared, you are misinterpreting or misconstruing the information that has actually thus far been presented to us.
It may or may not be the case, but at this point that's not how the information has been presented.
 

whales

Regular
View attachment 28769
My reading on these bullet points is that they are the reasons given for cancelling the initial decrees and not a roadmap forward. What happens next is anyone's guess imo

The disagreements between shareholders are all because of Chinese bad actors. This is proven in the IGF report released in December. None of the delays are AVZ's fault and we control Dathcom.

Either this is the first step in awarding the whole tenement to Dathcom after ownership is sorted or we won't be mining it. So we will either sell or have to fight the DRC government in arbitration.
My take on the legal advice is regarding Dathcom first right to obtain 15% from Comminiere.
Can Comminiere be part of the JV project by receiving shares.
At the right legal entitlement in the project Comminiere may agree to sell 15% of their 25 % to Dathcom .
13359 no longer split so surface rights should be mutually agreed upon.
There was an offer made to government for the additional 15% from Comminiere that involved a percentage of ownership with shares issued that was posted by someone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

TDITD

Top 20
So is it off to court against Comminere as well is this sh1t sticks ?
Fuck it off to court with everyone. ICC every bastard
Do we not have a recently retired SASR sniper that wants to earn a quick buck ?
Sure we could rustle up some snacks, it would speed things up tremendously.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

TDITD

Top 20
Or didn't have time to delete the sentence in the PowerPoint in relation to

"Working closely with competent DRC government authorities"

And
"Ministerial decree received"

:ROFLMAO:
No doubt probably a little embarrassed too.
Surely could have changed the line to “pineapple received”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Spikerama

Regular
Fuck it off to court with everyone. ICC every bastard
Do we not have a recently retired SASR sniper that wants to earn a quick buck ?
Sure we could rustle up some snacks, it would speed things up tremendously.


Send these guys.


 
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users

wombat74

Top 20
I believe that this will be the next step. Because of the on going disagreements, conflicts and differences between the shareholders they will find a way to fuck us. They dont tell us whats coming, in my opinion this tell me they give a fuck about us. They find easy a new partner with a better deal than 10%. In 10+ years no one will remember avz and the struggle with the drc.
What do you think will happen?
Mate think the ,' on going disagreements ,conflicts and differences ' is just an excuse they came up with . It seems a very lame reason to me . Sounds like something the Chinese came up with . It would be laughable if it wasn't so serious . I can see the head lines now . AVZ Get Booted Out of the DRC because of Bickering with stake holders .
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

wombat74

Top 20
Isn't amazing how they drop this sh1t on us when Nigel is about to make presentations ? The first one being his presentation in South Africa in May when this sh1t show started . The next being all the Sh1t that dropped during the RS and AGM . Now this one in South Africa again . Surely the timing is not a coincidence .
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users

JNRB

Regular
You think canceling the decree because the state can not benefit from a PE with this shareholder JV is not a reason?
As per my second post - that may or may not be the reason.

My main point is that you were stating as FACT that it was given as the reasoning for the decree.
That's not true.

Whether or not it's their reason we have no way of knowing. All we know is they acknowledged those things in their statement. NOT that those things were the reason for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

obe wan

Regular
I can not know who will get it. MMCS did not know that AVZ will get it. They fight against everything possible in the JV agreement until they build their construct to have a feeling of a legal basis.
Our decrees got canceled with this reasons:

-ongoing disagreements, conflicts and differences between the shareholders
that have stalled the development of the Manono Project and the resulting
deadlock prevents the State from benefiting from the development of PE
13359.

-requirement for a harmonious and healthy cooperation between the
shareholders of Dathcom as a precondition to progress the development of
the Manono Project


Do you believe they give us a new decree? Nothing have changed still cominere and zijin fighting agaist us. and now fighting against the complete JV. What do you believe will happen? The MoM dont even think its necessary to inform us. Thats not any type of a good relationship with the government. AVZ might be have legal stand, but bro the drc dont care about it. Look in what situation we are. MoP transfer 15% to zijin 5% to MMCS, they stolen the nothern part and want to give it to AJN and now our decree got canceled to get a ML. In this Moment AJN present the nothern part to other investors, in my view it dont look like the MoM told them you have no chance to get it after I cancel the decree. Instead our presentation is canceled. What do you think will coming next? they want to get that project online, but they dont care if we are part of it. We are not in a disney movie with a perfect ending after all the shit.

I’m the first who want to be wrong, I don’t have a idea what really happen. This is just what I believe will happen. You can of course have other opinions. And I hope you have better arguments to show me I’m wrong!
I reckon you should got over to the crapper and read both of Amovatio’s posts from today ; if you want a crisp cut explanation lmo those are the posts you read and stop overthinking it.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 16 users

DiscoDanNZ

Regular
Mate think the ,' on going disagreements ,conflicts and differences ' is just an excuse they came up with . It seems a very lame reason to me . Sounds like something the Chinese came up with . It would be laughable if it wasn't so serious . I can see the head lines now . AVZ Get Booted Out of the DRC because of Bickering with stake holders .

It definitely screams BS, why are we not playing nicely with Cominiere? Could it be that they have tried to screw us at every opportunity including selling shares we have the preemptive rights to which is only one of the bigger hurdles they've created.

Now Cominiere go and say sorry to AVZ or you can go to your room....
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 5 users

Samus

Top 20

1/2 Stopped from
@MinMinesCD
to #Dathcom #COMINIERE $AVZ Item 1: Ministerial Order No. 00145/CAB. MIN/MINES/01/2021 of April 25, 2022 granting operating permit No. 13359 to DATHCOM MINING SA is postponed and cannot produce any effect.
2/2 Section 2: the Secretary General for Mines and the Director General of the Mining Cadastre are responsible, each as far as he is concerned, for the execution of this Order which comes into force on the date of its signature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

TDITD

Top 20
I'm with you Obe-wan for now . Glass half full . I've stirred up Moneybags enough for one day. He's probably pulling out what's left of his hair . Big sleeps Money .
Well if his hairs gone it’s onto chest hair next then ball hair, have some mercy you square shitting bastard😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users

John25

Regular
Where’s our announcement that our highly paid BoD have dropped the ball ..blindsided /bent over & were incompetent to see the overuse coming …they’ve hoodwinked us in the most deceitful way imaginable…Where’s the spineless ASX …we were a top 200 company .Sorry but our BoD are incapable of SHIT …
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users
My take on the legal advice is regarding Dathcom first right to obtain 15% from Comminiere.
Can Comminiere be part of the JV project by receiving shares.
At the right legal entitlement in the project Comminiere may agree to sell 15% of their 25 % to Dathcom .
13359 no longer split so surface rights should be mutually agreed upon.
There was an offer made to government for the additional 15% from Comminiere that involved a percentage of ownership with shares issued that was posted by someone.
Cominiere want it all. They are claiming that their pre emption on the original 60% of Dathcom was never honoured. Which if they hypothetically got that 60% would mean AVZ wouldn't have first right of refusal on the other 15% because we would never have been a shareholder of Dathcom. But it's nonsense because Cominiere attended Dathcom meetings year in year out and never said shit until they got caught with their hands in Zijin's snack jar.
IMG_20230106_152401.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

obe wan

Regular
I reckon you should got over to the crapper and read both of Amovatio’s posts from today ; if you want a crisp cut explanation lmo those are the posts you read and stop overthinking it.
The wording which basically sent everyone into panic mode today was -’seek independent legal advice’

‘The company is seeking legal advice over regarding both ministries decrees’

‘Legal advice’ mentioned in as announcements sends a rush of blood to the head, each and everytime .

Amovatio’s quote - ‘The Fact that Nigel is engaging Lawyers to make contact through DRC channels of Government is to seek clarity that the recent notices issued are merely part of the process.’

How many times does one reckon they’ve had this issue within the DRC...tenements split and decree issued...decree binned and the split reversed...i reckon 0.05 of a percent...or never happened...what text book do you read up, to see if it's part of the process...none resdily available on hand I reckon ; would need to hit the legal eagles to drill down through the processes and subsections ; remember good old cami, a gov dept basically sidestepped its own mining code....would you not feel the need to suss out such rare decisions and see if these are all above board as oppose to walking into it blindly and potentially out if line and not following the actual procedures ; the reason we’re still here and getting kindergarten level accusations thrown at us in desperate attempts that sometime will stick from the liked of cominiere and co, mid because we followed the process
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 22 users
Cominiere want it all. They are claiming that their pre emption on the original 60% of Dathcom was never honoured. Which if they hypothetically got that 60% would mean AVZ wouldn't have first right of refusal on the other 15% because we would never have been a shareholder of Dathcom. But it's nonsense because Cominiere attended Dathcom meetings year in year out and never said shit until they got caught with their hands in Zijin's snack jar.
View attachment 28833
Cominiere attempting to get the 60% back from AVZ is what ACAJ meant by this imo
20230204_202027.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top Bottom