Who's birthday bash we going to now?
They are saying tonight’s Ann doesn’t lift the suspension imoSo if Dathcom get the Mining Licence, this will NOT result in the voluntary suspension being lifted. Therefore likely we will stay in suspension until the appeal decision is released. Thats my take, anyone read it differently?
Yes, re-reading it I think youre right. They appear to be referring to tonights announcement and not the pending announcement regarding sorting out of mining rights. Good call ... I think !!They are saying tonight’s Ann doesn’t lift the suspension imo
I read it the opposite. Why else state at the end there is no change to timeline of suspension request when they up front state they do not even know when the timing of initial arbitrage conference to discuss terms is. Therfore I think it is all about the ML and ensuring it covers the full extend of the exploration permit without bits chopped off.So if Dathcom get the Mining Licence, this will NOT result in the voluntary suspension being lifted. Therefore likely we will stay in suspension until the appeal decision is released. Thats my take, anyone read it differently?
Yes i agree having re-read what was writtenI read it the opposite. Why else state at the end there is no change to timeline of suspension request when they up front state they do not even know when the timing of initial arbitrage conference to discuss terms is. Therfore I think it is all about the ML and ensuring it covers the full extend of the exploration permit without bits chopped off.
Though zijin might still be dragging, it is the least concern in current circumstances. ML including the separation of North and south is number one to dathcom. And Dathomir shitshow is super important to AVZ (however might not be the main reason holding bk the ML)So Zijin haven't gone anywhere and in fact they had a win with the ICC. AVZ wanted 3 arbitrators and Zijin wanted 1. This could drag on for ever.
Ok Foxey , you have your ear to the ground . Would like to know your opinion re this announcement re Arbitration . @Nellie17 your opinion also please . @obe wan if you could also shed some light . CheersAs a reminder, this has all been a moving target Obviously. Someone posted old Nigel has been ready to attend the big bash formal ML party twice already in the last 3 weeks. Only to be told, ah sorry slight delay.
Anyway, let's debate the AVZ announcement just now, for the next few days
Looks like The Boatman is sinking, hope he drowns.
Allegedly it did yes. If it is just a process why not pull out beforehand. If theres no case theres no need to proceed. It reads as if it a case meeting in order to set a future timetable for litigation. Is this what AVZ meant by not normally responding to social media unless they feel compelled to for a specific reason??Nellie or Foxy might like to comment, but I read the ICC comments as just following a process, and Z will withdraw at the 'conference' Jag, note I'm ever hopeful for your left nut.
The tweet about Z handing 15% back came directly from Momentum didn't it?
and who exactly is appealing the Le Tribunal Grande Instance ruling? It's clearly not AVZ or AVZI Is it DATHCOM?
Thinking the same that we need the experienced bunch to dissect this announcement as I am getting mixed signals
I like Lichione's proposition in reply to thisAllegedly it did yes. If it is just a process why not pull out beforehand. If theres no case theres no need to proceed. It reads as if it a case meeting in order to set a future timetable for litigation. Is this what AVZ meant by not normally responding to social media unless they feel compelled to for a specific reason??
So do II like Lichione's proposition in reply to this