Mute22 posted the video translation earlier this afternoon with the following post. The actual video was a TSE page or 2 above the translation post.
![]()
AVZ Discussion 2022
Kerr knows Africa ..... If he is now AVZ's CEO, wait till he adds the DRC to his CV.thestockexchange.com.au
You forgot the 1 in front of the 2From the 2:32 point of the translation.
"Congo was being asked for $10 billion, likely to settle for $5 billion after judgment in Washington."
5B USD is roughly 2.15 AUD per share, and I would be happy with that.
You might be, but I certainly would not be happy with it - begrudgingly I would endorse going all the way with the ICSID if that the figure on offer.From the 2:32 point of the translation.
"Congo was being asked for $10 billion, likely to settle for $5 billion after judgment in Washington."
5B USD is roughly 2.15 AUD per share, and I would be happy with that.
You might be, but I certainly would not be happy with it - begrudgingly I would endorse going all the way with the ICSID if that the figure on offer.
Regards,
SilentOne.
Well if it comes to a vote the answer is still noYou are not playing the numbers.
Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11)
They received half the payout as was awarded. Equadors GDP is 1.6 the size of DRCs. Equador is 40 places better ranked on the corruption index than DRC.
- Final Award: In October 2012, the tribunal awarded Occidental Petroleum approximately $1.77 billion (plus interest) for Ecuador’s unlawful termination of an oil exploration contract.
- Payout/Settlement: In 2015, Ecuador and Occidental reached a settlement. Ecuador paid $980 million to Occidental, a significant reduction from the original award, after negotiations and an annulment proceeding that partially upheld the award. The settlement was publicly reported as a resolution to avoid further enforcement actions.
This is assuming the ICSID agrees with our claim and gives us the full 10 Billion. Occidental Petroleum were asking for 3.4 Billion (awarded 1.77). The effective payout was 25%.
If we are given 5 Billion USD settlement, we take it. Effective payout of 50%.
at the moment i’d just like to know what I might be voting onAt the moment I'd just love to have the opportunity to have a vote.
Voting no for 5b USD? I feel sorry for your upcoming mental state when reality eventually hits.Well if it comes to a vote the answer is still no
Well if it comes to a vote the answer is still no
42.54
must’ve run out of the brown-coloured paper bagsMeanwhile at the Chinese embassy in Kinshasa
View attachment 87680