Very good points are being made and worthy of serious consideration.
I will say though that I trust AVZ Management and DLA Piper to be across all of this and be in the best possible position to make the best decision for Shareholder value.
There's never been even the slightest notion that they have acted against the interests of shareholders, and I believe anyone who rallies against whatever they eventually agree upon, is not a friend to us, or is foolish.
A framework for Kobald to acquire Manono has already been agreed upon by AVZ, and they would not have made this agreement if Kobald had not given a "ball park" $$$ figure that AVZ found to be acceptable. They signed that ISCID is to be suspended for now, so why are you campaigning against their decision?
In my mind the deal is already struck, unless another rug is about to be pulled from under us, but you'd think Nigel would have learned to make deals in stone floored rooms by now
If however, AVZ tell us our best course lies in persuing ISCID with CATH or otherwise, then I will 100% be behind them (with my head hung low)