Mute22
Regular
What low-ball price are they offering?
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Surely this pack of thieving retards can't end up stealing this globally critical asset from a company that has done everything by the book. Sometimes we need to step back and look at the big picture. Hang in there mate!
Good question , I have never been contacted but there are 20,000 plus to call only to be told $1.35 plus or FO
tbh. if it was for the right price (say 80c or thereabouts). i'd personally be seriously considering it.
I would love to see this out to the end. But with the second bub on the way, house pricing skyrocketing. I need the cash to help compete with the downsizers and international investors.
Dave Evans
Regular
Last edited:
TheCount
Regular
Nothing better than seeing dodgy lawyers losing money!
Sorry, let me re-phrase.
Only thing better than seeing dodgy lawyers losing money is an AVZ Mining Licence...
TC.
Some justice at last - more to follow. Must be getting hot in Comminier's crack kitchen.
Mr_Tones83
Regular
I was hoping a bit of justice would come in the form of ICSID interim order enforcement and fines as well... would have made delisting day a little more bearable.
At least the walls are continuing to close in on the detractors though.
The way I see it, Cominiere might not care because they are ruthless and don’t play by the book. However, at some point, Zijin will have to blink because we are now on the international stage. This transaction is not taking place in China where the CCP can override everything. Zijin is bound by international laws if they want to trade in the global market. Hopefully, this will happen sooner rather than later.
I feel that , I am 1.5 years off retirement so I have been through all that , at 80c it would allow me to trade again but double that I can retire invest in a company that will give good returns over the next few years then just take all and sit back and enjoy the grandkids hummm what grandkids , fuck why don't my kids want to get married ??? oh that's right they watched their dad do it too many times .
Hi Charbella,
You are absolutely right in my opinion - the ICSID as I understand is affiliated with the World Bank.
Correct me if I am wrong, that the rulings with the ICSID are final and can be enforced. I think Pakistan had to swallow that bitter pill.
Regards,
SilentOne - Do your own research
Does it come in a canvas print?
Rediah
Regular
Yes you are correct, there was no running from the ICSID for Pakistan.
Pakistan was in a whole lot better economic situation than what DRC is at the moment. Pakistan almost lost Roosevelt Hotel (Manhattan) that is owned by the Pakistan International Airline (PIA) when ICC/ICSID started to confiscate their foreign assets and putting a stop at World Bank aid.
Does the DRC have any assets that can be seized in the US or Europe?
I think the DRC state will remain a belligerent entity to us for the remaining part of our cases against them as they are incompetent to see their own deep-seated corruption (within various entities) or actually completely corrupt themselves. Possibility of a Chinese buyout, but probably a higher chance this will go the full duration in the courts. Hoping there is some light at the end of this horrible situation
cruiser51
Top 20
“As the Arbitral Tribunal has already emphasized, the interim measures recommended in this context are binding on the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is the Respondent in the present proceedings, and which cannot be dissociated from its organs, administrations or authorities taken individually.
The principle of the unity of the State in fact implies that each of the organs, administrations and authorities of the Democratic Republic of the Congo is directly bound by the obligations, procedural or substantive, incumbent on the Defendant.
It is therefore incumbent on the various bodies and authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo, each acting directly and within its own sphere of competence, to implement the interim measures ordered by the Arbitral Tribunal in order to preserve the integrity of the present arbitration proceedings.
With this in mind, the Arbitral Tribunal also notes that the difficulties alleged by the Democratic Republic of Congo in implementing the interim measures recommended in paragraphs 156(1) and 156(2) of Procedural Order No. 3 are not such as to justify noncompliance with these measures.”
“The Arbitral Tribunal thus firmly reaffirms its decision on the interim measures recommended in paragraphs 156(1) and 156(2) of Procedural Order No. 3, together with the conditions attached thereto, and reminds the Defendant of its obligation to implement them effectively and without delay.”
Similar threads
