AVZ Discussion 2022

Surely Oz authorities start to step in? This looks pretty damning. Traitors to the country
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

Hudnut

Regular
So, how long does it take to whip up a MOU in the DRC?

MOU vs ML.

3 letters vs 2.

I reckon 50% longer than getting the ML, and I still don't know how long that takes.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
MOU vs ML.

3 letters vs 2.

I reckon 50% longer than getting the ML, and I still don't know how long that takes.
ML x 1.5 ...:cool:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

TDITD

Top 20
MOU vs ML.

3 letters vs 2.

I reckon 50% longer than getting the ML, and I still don't know how long that takes.
Mate that's easy, it takes as long as you can fill a brown paper bag.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

CashKing

Regular
Chinese Involvement In AVZ BOD Takeover

Now that AVZ Minerals has released its latest announcement regarding the deliberate false claims by the Chinese funded BOD nominees, I would like to address a few matters of great seriousness and consequence.

Firstly I must just say that I am proud to be an AVZ supporter amongst other great AVZ supporter’s. It is very important that shareholders realise that AVZ has had an unprecedented amount of corruption to fight and it’s important that shareholders let go of personal gripes and stand united in this fight and I will now share with shareholders what I know….


In early August, a large shareholder was approached by Leonard Math on behalf of Peter Huljich and others, to see if they were interested in gathering other large shareholders and backing them to overthrow the current BOD. If they could not get 5% for an EGM, they would nominate for BOD positions.

A meeting took place at Northbridge Chinese Restaurant in Perth on Sunday 6th August 2023 between Bin Guo, Leonard Math and a major shareholder acting on behalf of others with shares totalling around 60 million.

Peter Huljich was not at the meeting as he told Leonard Math he could not be seen in attendance because of a restraint of trade clause from when he departed AVZ. Simon Cong and Guy Loando are backing this along with certain Chinese companies.

Peter Huljich and Leonard Math are acting as their front men. One key point was…. No Asian sounding names were to vote for an EGM as this would attract the interest of FIRB.

Bin Guo wanted to see some progress to free up shares for sale and is backing Huljich, Math and the other nominess. Yibin Tianyi and Lithium Plus are apparently involved in trying to out the current BOD.

It was also made clear that, if Huljich and the other nominess got in, there was NO guarantee of them getting the mining license, even with the backing of Simon Cong. Peter Huljich and Leonard Math were offered a large number of performance shares (millions) if they could get this across the line.

The major shareholder in attendance was also offered an incentive (to be discussed) if he could convince other significant holder's to back a new BOD.

I have been fortunate enough to have been taken into the confidence of a number of shareholders who have shared information with me, and believe the Chinese are funding the whole thing.

View attachment 46719


View attachment 46720


View attachment 46721
Fuck who are you actually ?

Started off being a Cunt but that’s just you as we have become accustomed too 😉

But wow bags wow.. WTF.

Nice work once again..

GLTAH
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 18 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Fuck who are you actually ?

Started off being a Cunt but that’s just you as we have become accustomed too 😉

But wow bags wow.. WTF.

Nice work once again..

GLTAH
1696951386932.gif


:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::cool:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 12 users
yeah, I would expect your shares are held in a Nominee Company through your Bank. I'm not au fait with how holders in such circumstances can vote, but there may be someone who can clarify.

Maybe @Deboss will know, and might like to contribute some useful information, instead of mocking from the sidelines

I asked Automatic Group...they told me to contact my bank. My bank told me to contact AVZ...guess I get no answer of AVZ.
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 2 users

Xerof

Biding my Time 1971
I asked Automatic Group...they told me to contact my bank. My bank told me to contact AVZ...guess I get no answer of AVZ.
You need to find out who is holding your shares, and direct them to vote your preference. I can't help you any further, as this is above my pay grade and I don't know how Nominees operate with voting on resolutions
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Lopu

Emerged
Maybe this is a help for some of you.

I am German and live in Germany and have a German bank account. Through that account I have purchased AVZ shares on the ASX. The shares are not stored with my bank directly but with a partner bank in Australia. In my case it is BNP. Therefore my bank is not able to provide a HIN or SRN number. Without one of the numbers it is not possible to register with Automic online. I contacted Automic and asked how I could register without and provided documentation about my purchases. In addition AVZ request on a regular basis (quartely or at least bi-anually, don’t remember) the personal details of foreign holders, at least namens and adresses. Automic could have verified with AVZ my holding. But then my shares would be registered with me and the bank where they are stored for voting. Poor Miguel from Automic tried for a few days but without HIN or SRN number there is no record of me being a holder. The Partner bank BNP is able to vote on my behalf. They charge a service fee of 500 AUD for it.

If you live up over you should still be able to vote. It is just not as easy as for the down under boys and girls.

I know that I will do it.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5894.jpeg
    IMG_5894.jpeg
    330.9 KB · Views: 36
Only just had a chance to catch up on all the recent updates.

Regarding MMGA and their letter, fucking idiots would struggle to run a company. They don’t even understand that no one will ever type in a web/email address that’s 1k characters long.

I thought they would have at least hinted at being able to secure a TO, as that’s about the only thing I thought would have secured them the votes needed.

The positive is that it forced management to actually update shareholders. It a shame that they haven’t just provided updates throughout the last few months, however now that they have, I’m hoping they continue do so as opposed to reverting back to the cone of silence.

I’m concerned (perhaps unwarranted) that they are now talking about an MoU. If the strategy is secure the MoU and then progress through to the ML, without reopening for trading beforehand, that’s ok.

If we just have an MoU and then reopen trading this will allow significant manipulation of SP, and those that have been shorting/rat-fucking us all this time will benefit from it.

Lastly, credit where credit is due, nice work MoneyBags on the info re: ‘Big Trouble in Little China’, thanks for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21 users

lellep

Regular
T
I asked Automatic Group...they told me to contact my bank. My bank told me to contact AVZ...guess I get no answer of AVZ
Trying to vote from Sweden.. proving itself to be a bit difficult
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 4 users
Only just had a chance to catch up on all the recent updates.

Regarding MMGA and their letter, fucking idiots would struggle to run a company. They don’t even understand that no one will ever type in a web/email address that’s 1k characters long.

I thought they would have at least hinted at being able to secure a TO, as that’s about the only thing I thought would have secured them the votes needed.

The positive is that it forced management to actually update shareholders. It a shame that they haven’t just provided updates throughout the last few months, however now that they have, I’m hoping they continue do so as opposed to reverting back to the cone of silence.

I’m concerned (perhaps unwarranted) that they are now talking about an MoU. If the strategy is secure the MoU and then progress through to the ML, without reopening for trading beforehand, that’s ok.

If we just have an MoU and then reopen trading this will allow significant manipulation of SP, and those that have been shorting/rat-fucking us all this time will benefit from it.

Lastly, credit where credit is due, nice work MoneyBags on the info re: ‘Big Trouble in Little China’, thanks for sharing.

Pretty sure we wouldn’t start trading again without the ML
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 28 users

BRICK

Regular
Lovely day today

001ED711-5E55-47EC-B78E-AB67B3E0D8F6.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 42 users

Dijon101

Regular
I'm with SAXO so I believe I have to subscribe to "shareholder actions" or some rubbish.

I'm not a large shareholder by any means, but every vote counts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
Pretty sure we wouldn’t start trading again without the ML
They’ve said as much. Maybe at last year’s AGM or roadshow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

StevieLash

Emerged
So this just arrived in the mail yesterday. Can anyone tell me how these scumbags got ahold of my personal information
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

StevieLash

Emerged
image.jpg
image.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 5 users

Azzler

Top 20
So this just arrived in the mail yesterday. Can anyone tell me how these scumbags got ahold of my personal information
Legal precedence im afraid. AVZ required to provide them with shareholder contact details.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Sad
Reactions: 4 users

timb89

Regular
Legal precedence im afraid. AVZ required to provide them with shareholder contact details.

Can any shareholder just get the name and addresses of all other shareholders?
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

BigA

Member
This will be getting a return to sender
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 69
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users
Top Bottom