Cumquat Cap
Regular
Klaus has two daughters and are both scumbag cunts - probably right there. Also, Spec capital and Snorth89 are the same people and on the take trying to undermine avz - web runs deep
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
TDITD
Top 20
The ultimate middle finger to all this impressive calibre of utter fuckery is a shiny brand-new ML.
The Bastards attempts will be effectively dead in the water.
I hope to Christ, Nigel and BOD aren't just chilling at the headquarters waiting for the ubereats dude to bring that great vindaloo lunch special, sitting in their fancy office chairs plucking their grey pubic hairs while Jan pumps out Britney's 'oops I did it again' from the company boombox dancing around in his company fluorescent green man-kini. This B.S should spur them on, get angry.....
The Bastards attempts will be effectively dead in the water.
I hope to Christ, Nigel and BOD aren't just chilling at the headquarters waiting for the ubereats dude to bring that great vindaloo lunch special, sitting in their fancy office chairs plucking their grey pubic hairs while Jan pumps out Britney's 'oops I did it again' from the company boombox dancing around in his company fluorescent green man-kini. This B.S should spur them on, get angry.....
I would just settle for a bit of news from them! Are we any closer to resolution and what progress was made during their time in DRC. Don't need to let the cat out the bag just an update.
Retrobyte
Hates a beer
Maybe they noticed that a few of the most prolific posters on Twitter in the pro-AVZ ranks are climate change deniers, Trump fans, and anti vaxxers, so are using a slogan that will appeal to them?
TDITD
Top 20
the ridiculousness of this attempt would absolutely align with that low I.Q logic. I'd say although its scary, your probably correct
TheCount
Regular
Just remember - they are not breaking any laws by doing this. Shorters will do ANYTHING to force their trade because they know they are fucked if it goes the other way.
And the audacity to include the "Fat" prefix as if they have the weight of those useless "stock pickers" behind them..
It's just so easy to see past these amateurs.
TC.
And the audacity to include the "Fat" prefix as if they have the weight of those useless "stock pickers" behind them..
It's just so easy to see past these amateurs.
TC.
John25
Regular
Geez Louweez
Did my share of construction at Marandoo & Burrow Island …5 yrs of 4/1 …these pussies these days say their FIFO 7/7 or 8/6
Just had a look at that ANL playbook.
It is very obvious what Hjulich, Klaus and Cong are up to.
They operate like thieves in clear daylight.
The ANL SH's know they got fukked over by this team and have cause to look, if legal action can be successfully taken against them.
I am not surprised Klaus is selling his house without character in Perth.
Wouldn't be too surprised, if Peter Hjulich sells up shortly as well.
His name in Perth mining circles must be absolute like shit, very much on the nose, not to be touched with a barge pole.
I would sell shares in any company where their names pop up to be associated with in any shape or form.
Anybody voting to get these morons on the board needs their head examining.
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
If it ever gets to be an item for the AGM, I can't see these 3 tossers having the balls to stand in front of shareholders, present their credentials, reasons for standing, and future plans for the Company, as will be expected and required. Will the WACA be available to accomodate the numbers expected to turn up?
Chilla
Regular
There is no chance that this shit will progress far or even get close to getting up…
NONE
NADA
ZILCH
Huljich is a puppet for Klaus
Klaus is a puppet for Cong
Sheena does the crappy write ups and feeds Turd Tommy
What a Fucked Up bunch of losers they all are!
oxxa23
Regular
haha, that would be a very entertaining watch....
Attachments
Azzler
Top 20
This is the thing that is flickering dark shadows in the back of my mind @Chilla.
Unless they're utterly desperate, why would they make such a sham of a play, with a lame, rushed website, with no Vision statement or Mission Statements.
Just "Vote for us, Trump 4eva!"
I pray they're that useless I truly do, and that this goes absolutely nowhere.
But the more I look at it, and all the wonderful research everyone here has brought to our attention (You're all ledgends!), the more I think that they quite literally, "can't be serious."
Because they might not be.
Perhaps there's something else in play and this is a distraction/focus shift or just stage 1 of unseen and future plays.
Anyway nothing you can do about the things you don't know, and only time will tell.
I just have a sense of creeping dread about it all.
My only projection that settles the nerves is if they had promised to try this play to the DRC Mafia/Zijin/Cong circle, and are just keeping their promise in order to keep favor with them for other/future deals.
Just my musings, time will reveal all, and if the countdownsers are right, none of it means anything anyway, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed!
Last edited:
oxxa23
Regular
hi azzler,
i wonder if they thought all was lost and this bullshit interruption was a worthwhile throw at the stumps... as in, could it be enough to interrupt/distract the DRC govt and departments... you know, it's all got to be harmonious crap, well, look at avz, the board isn't even settled yada yada...
maybe it was just another attempt to have the ML delayed and AVZ forced to negotiate with cong and cominiere perhaps...
Bin59
Regular
Another take on it was that the MMGA was set up in a hurry as another (sneaky) way of gathering peoples personal details so they can contact shareholders directly to buy their shares to enable shorters to close their positions prior to us trading again and/or to call an EGM.
Xerof
Have a Cigar 1975
Assuming shareholders fill out the form. I can’t imagine any sensible person would, other than Solo and Tits of course
Last edited:
I recon this is the most likely scenario. The shorters must be seriously hurting and doing anything and everything they can to get hold of as many shares as possible. This could just be an attempt to get in contact with anyone thats weak enough to let shares go.
Is anyone able to do a quick napkin math exercise on what a short scenario might look like for someone in their shoes? I dont know enough about how it works in the real world. Would they still be paying rent?
FilthyRich2
Regular
Here is a tip for AVZ directors
If they think someone is going to try and stack the next director vote for re-election, they (the existing board) should nominate an independent director (or two) per ASX Guidelines in independent directors and expand the board marginally.
This will take the attention away from the pretenders, if they find someone with good credentials, no one would even consider the pretenders. (and I am excluding existing shareholders from the suggestion, but perhaps I shouldn't, there are a lot of clever people out there invested in AVZ)
Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations ASX (Extract below)
Independent directors
An independent director is a non-executive director who is not a member of management and who is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with – or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with – the independent exercise of their judgement. Relationships which may affect independent status are set out in Box 2.1. Directors considered by the board to be independent should be identified as such in the corporate governance statement in the annual report. The board should state its reasons if it considers a director to be independent, notwithstanding the existence of relationships listed in Box 2.1, and the corporate governance statement should disclose the existence of any such relationships. In this context, it is important for the board to consider materiality thresholds from the perspective of both the company and its directors, and to disclose these.1
Box 2.1:
Relationships affecting independent status12 When determining the independent status of a director the board should consider whether the director:
1. is a substantial shareholder of the company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the company
2. is employed, or has previously been employed in an executive capacity by the company or another group member, and there has not been a period of at least three years between ceasing such employment and serving on the board
3. has within the last three years been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the company or another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided
4. is a material supplier or customer of the company or other group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer
5. has a material contractual relationship with the company or another group member other than as a director
If they think someone is going to try and stack the next director vote for re-election, they (the existing board) should nominate an independent director (or two) per ASX Guidelines in independent directors and expand the board marginally.
This will take the attention away from the pretenders, if they find someone with good credentials, no one would even consider the pretenders. (and I am excluding existing shareholders from the suggestion, but perhaps I shouldn't, there are a lot of clever people out there invested in AVZ)
Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations ASX (Extract below)
Independent directors
An independent director is a non-executive director who is not a member of management and who is free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with – or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with – the independent exercise of their judgement. Relationships which may affect independent status are set out in Box 2.1. Directors considered by the board to be independent should be identified as such in the corporate governance statement in the annual report. The board should state its reasons if it considers a director to be independent, notwithstanding the existence of relationships listed in Box 2.1, and the corporate governance statement should disclose the existence of any such relationships. In this context, it is important for the board to consider materiality thresholds from the perspective of both the company and its directors, and to disclose these.1
Box 2.1:
Relationships affecting independent status12 When determining the independent status of a director the board should consider whether the director:
1. is a substantial shareholder of the company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the company
2. is employed, or has previously been employed in an executive capacity by the company or another group member, and there has not been a period of at least three years between ceasing such employment and serving on the board
3. has within the last three years been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the company or another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided
4. is a material supplier or customer of the company or other group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer
5. has a material contractual relationship with the company or another group member other than as a director
What they are offering is a better deal for the Chinese and corrupt DRC officals . They will drop all legal proceedings and offer a bigger piece of the pie . . Klaus would know through his contacts what's going on in the DRC . It's an 11th hour desperate attempt to throw a spanner in the works before pen goes to paper. Hold off until the AGM and see if they can spill the BoD . All IMO . I've been reading a lot of crime / spy novels lately .
Mr Inappropriate
Regular
That’s my reading on it.
Similar threads
