oxxa23
Regular
Who's she?View attachment 43226
Sat, 30 Sept 2023, works for me
Who's she?View attachment 43226
Sat, 30 Sept 2023, works for me
All IGF inspectors called to stop their work by August 30
Several inspectors from the General Inspectorate of Finance, IGF have just confirmed the information concerning the instruction given by the Head of State, Félix Antoine Tshilombo Tshisekedi to Jules Alingete, the main inspector, to call back all the inspectors on a mission of financial control in public institutions and enterprises.
As of September 1, no more financial control in the institutions and companies of the Congolese state.
The last inspectors who control public institutions and companies therefore have until August 30, 2023 to definitively return to their initial assignment position, that is to say at the IGF.
For several of these inspectors, Jules Alingete was not sincere and courageous during the information meeting held a few days ago at the premises of the IGF in Gombe.
The latter believe that he lied to the inspector controllers that they are all recalled no later than August 30 to their initial assignment to undergo training for a few months:
“What is this training of a few months which strangely occurs before the period of the electoral campaign?
What is this training that requires all controller inspectors to take it all at the same time?
Shouldn't the so-called training be staggered to two or even three teams to allow the continuity of the IGF's investigations during this election period?
Finally, the IGF inspectors who anonymously denounce the political shenanigans to draw money from the state coffers in order to finance the presidential and legislative campaign of Félix Antoine Tshilombo Tshisekedi and his partners in the sacred union.
mediacongo
View attachment 43215
With 35% taxes, 10% stake in Dathcom and 8% stake in $AVZ (in the event of the sale of 15% of Cominière) as well as a little over 10% in the value chain, the State holds approximately 60% of the project's net revenues over the long term. Without any investment!
With 35% taxes, 10% stake in Dathcom and 8% stake in $AVZ (in the event of the sale of 15% of Cominière) as well as a little over 10% in the value chain, the State holds approximately 60% of the project's net revenues over the long term. Without any investment!
"Are we getting closer or is it another fucking mirage? "
Reckon it's just a mirage . Everything has changed but nothing has changed . Stall tactics still in play .
Is that in the best interest of the SH ? I think not .Said it once and will say it again - Strand the asset, leave it to the courts. The time for negotiation was 12 months ago.
(Sorry for all holders doing it tough, myself included)
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the SEZ have some tax free period or something? Like 2 years? I don't know specifics, please enlighten me, but perhaps they're annoyed about that as tax revenues is clearly a large chunkDo I need to go back to school and learn Math again, or is this part the craziest bit of this whole thing. Cominiere is trying to say AVZ want it all.
How is this not a good deal for the DRC, when they have invested NOTHING, and walk away with ~45% of the profit?
View attachment 43241
And different tax laws, not just standard 35% or whateverPlease correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the SEZ have some tax free period or something? Like 2 years? I don't know specifics, please enlighten me, but perhaps they're annoyed about that as tax revenues is clearly a large chunk
It was a 2 year tax free period to compensate for 10% free carried.And different tax laws, not just standard 35% or whatever
Without having access to the facts and with clarity of hindsight, I still question how we have gone from a well-funded position and imminent ML to almost out of capital and further (decree cancelled, multiple legal challenges, etc) from an ML. Maybe management are negotiating and don't want to show their hand... but as an investor, all that capital we burnt through drilling and paying BOD for an inactive asset, has seemingly seriously weakened our position and opened me up to significant dilution.Is that in the best interest of the SH ? I think not .
It depends on what the options are of course.Is that in the best interest of the SH ? I think not .
Can you imagine the BoD taking salary over the next 3 to 5 years while we fight it out in the courts? For what ?Without having access to the facts and with clarity of hindsight, I still question how we have gone from a well-funded position and imminent ML to almost out of capital and further (decree cancelled, multiple legal challenges, etc) from an ML. Maybe management are negotiating and don't want to show their hand... but as an investor, all that capital we burnt through drilling and paying BOD for an inactive asset, has seemingly seriously weakened our position and opened me up to significant dilution.
We have to show our hand before we run out of capital (which was the Chinese strategy all along). I just hope I am wrong and NF pulls a rabbit out of a hat.... otherwise I am destined to a 9-5 for another 20 years or so.... unless there is another 25 bagger like AVZ in the mix .
True . However some may just like access to their money and the ability to decide what they want to do . The damage is done in terms of trust regardless how this plays out . If we are still at a Brick Wall then a negotiated settlement , whether by pay out or collaborative agreement , is the right way forward imo . I don't know anyone who wants their money tied up in this sh1t show for years to come .It depends on what the options are of course.
Is negotiating and having to deal with corruption and the possibility of being fucked over again down the track in the interests of shareholders?