9cardomaha
Regular
So i can update a few for everyone.Which is the ICC hearing is occurring in July?
Oh, do we know why we’ve heard crickets about the MMCS case at the ICC?
- The one initiated by AVZ to stop the dissolution of Dathcom?
- The claim by the corrupt ones for $1.6b(?) against AVZ?
- The claim for $500m because Nigel parked in Celestine’s allocated spot?
- Something else?
I can’t keep up…
- AVZ v Cominiere - The one initiated by AVZ to stop the dissolution of Dathcom? - Emergency Injunction awarded May 2023 validating ICC jurisdiction, timetable to be set by September 2023
- Zijin + Cominiere v AVZ - The claim by the corrupt ones for $1.6b(?) against AVZ? - Jurisdiction hearing in July 2023 (if it is allowed to go forward)
- AVZ v Dathomir - The one initiated by AVZ to tell Cong to fuck off, no sellers remorse allowed - Timetable set by August 2023
- Zijin v AVZ - Jurisdiction hearing in July where ICC tells Zijin to 'go back to China'
- MMCS v Cominiere - Rendering verdict expected to come out in August 2023
- The claim for $500m because Nigel parked in Celestine’s allocated spot? - LOL
- Nothing Else
The second part is correct, the Zijin v AVZ hearing in July is to determine whether the ICC has jurisdiction for the case given Zijin isn't a shareholder. According to JVA you can't initiate an ICC case against a JV member unless you are also a JV member.it's the one where Zijin (JC) take AVZ to task to validate their (illegal) purchase of the 15%, but the first part is to decide whether they actually have the right to do this, as they were not part of the JVA
The first part needs a small addition: Zijin didn't launch the case to validate the 15% ownership. Even if the ICC decides to hear the case, the ICC only recognizes that Zijin is a JV member but they didn't request an ICC decree or mandate to confirm.
Zijin would then have to go back to the DRC with this ICC recognition and continue the fight locally, or launch another case to validate their 15% similar to AVZ v Dathomir.
Edit: actually no they can't launch another ICC case since they aren't a JV member, so go back to DRC, use ICC as precedence and confirm that they don't have shit
If ICC rules that it does not have jurisdiction over Zijin v AVZ, this will slam the door in Zijin's face. We will likely submit to have the joint case dismissed since it's basically the AVZ v Cominiere one with Zijin included for shits and giggles.So this is the one where, assuming we we win, we find out that Z have no jurisdiction to take action against us so that action cannot proceed any further. Then everyone looks at each other and says “Now what?”
Is it that one?
#fuckZijin