AVZ Discussion 2022

Charbella

Regular
Possibly but I doubt it. Transfer of ownership to CATH can only happen after ML is issued. And based on the Manono meeting last week and the 1 month extension request on Friday night I'd say we are still a fair while off that being done.
 

Attachments

  • F49CF254-B172-41B8-9117-4C56269C3E48.jpeg
    F49CF254-B172-41B8-9117-4C56269C3E48.jpeg
    766.2 KB · Views: 165
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

RHyNO

Regular
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Thinking
Reactions: 15 users

ptlas

Regular
No circle jerks is nigh on impossible to demand, us bogans won’t allow it we love our soggy biscuits.

I think the Social Media work in the majority has made a few very uncomfortable hence the pressure to have us ease up. In this respect it seems to have worked. I’m going to ease back for a little an then if no action (almost guaranteed) I’ll be back into it.

In my posts I have tried to remain respectful, but fuck me the hypocrisy and thin skinned individuals more concerned about how they perceive a word than actual criminal acts 🤌🏻🤦‍♂️

Like many have mentioned respect is a 2-way street AVZ has been given NONE
I've certainly backed off.

But a point to note about these thin skinned individuals is that they have one and a half eyes on the election.

So, if this shit runs for another seven months, I don't think it will - but I'm just Joe Blow, then we can rely on these guys to do the right thing.
Like they've never done before.

This is about election/re-election and nothing else.

So were gonna STFU for a couple of weeks (not sure how long that is), and if the TSE natives then get restless and start up again then Jens, or one of those other sycophants, will politely ask us to desist again etc, etc ,etc, etc

Does anyone detect a pattern??
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 9 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
1680492104952.png




Theoretically the transfer can happen but would CATH be reluctant to execute the deal and handover $$$ if the ownership of the overall project is still in dispute??

I'm guessing CATH will wait until ownership and other issues are resolved before furthering their involvement financially

I know I would
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
I've certainly backed off.

But a point to note about these thin skinned individuals is that they have one and a half eyes on the election.

So, if this shit runs for another seven months, I don't think it will - but I'm just Joe Blow, then we can rely on these guys to do the right thing.
Like they've never done before.

This is about election/re-election and nothing else.

So were gonna STFU for a couple of weeks (not sure how long that is), and if the TSE natives then get restless and start up again then Jens, or one of those other sycophants, will politely ask us to desist again etc, etc ,etc, etc

Does anyone detect a pattern??

"Does anyone detect a pattern??"

Yeah....and it's giving me the shits
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

ptlas

Regular
Show of hands who would take $1.70?
*puts hand up
NOT ME.

That scenario would require us to have the ML, BFS etc. and AVZ to be a viable concern.

If that were the case then following the re-opening for trading shenanigans the SP would be more than $1.70 and I would expect multiple offers to buy us out.

So then it's a case of stick or twist?

I'll twist
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

Dazmac66

Regular
$1:70 naah! Where I live on the sunny coast is only a month from whale season. Love my 🐋 s. They haven't been seen for 10 months.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users

Skar

Regular
I would take a $1.30 as of right now, as news comes out maybe higher or lower.
 

cruiser51

Top 20
View attachment 33529



Theoretically the transfer can happen but would CATH be reluctant to execute the deal and handover $$$ if the ownership of the overall project is still in dispute??

I'm guessing CATH will wait until ownership and other issues are resolved before furthering their involvement financially

I know I would
Doesn't Cominière have first right over the 24%?

All they have to do is ask their mate MoP for US$240 million. :oops::rolleyes::LOL:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Flexi

Regular
Doesn't Cominière have first right over the 24%?

All they have to do is ask their mate MoP for US$240 million. :oops::rolleyes::LOL:
And IF Zingin are successful with getting the 15% do they than have first right if AVZ share is up for sale ......hmmm.
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 2 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
And IF Zingin are successful with getting the 15% do they than have first right if AVZ share is up for sale ......hmmm.
no
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
Slow news day

No squid at Brighton off the jetty mid morning today
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 4 users

Remark

Top 20
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 10 users

Xerof

Flaming 1967
View attachment 33529



Theoretically the transfer can happen but would CATH be reluctant to execute the deal and handover $$$ if the ownership of the overall project is still in dispute??

I'm guessing CATH will wait until ownership and other issues are resolved before furthering their involvement financially

I know I would

Working both ways there I suspect. AVZ also needs to be absolutely certain of 75% before they will sign away the 24%. Otherwise the 'chinese' have us in a grater/circle/pineapple scenario
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Fire
Reactions: 13 users

Winenut

GO AVZ!!!!
Working both ways there I suspect. AVZ also needs to be absolutely certain of 75% before they will sign away the 24%. Otherwise the 'chinese' have us in a grater/circle/pineapple scenario
1680496279804.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Chilla

Regular
No CATH extension announcement currently means the TIA has been mutually allowed to expire......though i would doubt this.

CATH TIA announcement of either extension or expiry therefore must be tied in with the other ASX questions being responded to if its not announced today.
 
  • Thinking
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Working both ways there I suspect. AVZ also needs to be absolutely certain of 75% before they will sign away the 24%. Otherwise the 'chinese' have us in a grater/circle/pineapple scenario
Manono Lithium and Tin project has had some free advertising, should be easier now to get finance and tell Xi and comrades to go and move their abacus beads around with chopsticks, to determine how much goodwill they have lost in this exercise.

Wankers, Fukkum.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users
No CATH extension announcement currently means the TIA has been mutually allowed to expire......though i would doubt this.

CATH TIA announcement of either extension or expiry therefore must be tied in with the other ASX questions being responded to if its not announced today.
I have a feeling they will have to answer the queries before any further announcements are allowed out.
I can't see CATH pulling the pin after this long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

cruiser51

Top 20
Manono Lithium and Tin project has had some free advertising, should be easier now to get finance and tell Xi and comrades to go and move their abacus beads around with chopsticks, to determine how much goodwill they have lost in this exercise.

Wankers, Fukkum.
Will be great to kick Zijin in the nuts under the Arc de Triomphe soon.

Sorry, nuts I don't mean you, but you unfortunately happen to have to have the same name.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users
Top Bottom