Sammy_da_Smile
Regular
Did anyone tune in this morning? It's all in French and I did see our friend Joe talk a bit. There is a recording saved aswell.
Nells you are absolutely correct - you never invite a thief into the house - giving them a seat at the table would be somewhat cancerous and we would be eaten from the inside out. I am personally looking forward to the ICC which will put nefarious actors in the international spotlight.Good afternoon Beish,
In my opinion, there is NO WAY that the AVZ board would contemplate even in the slightest to go into any sort of agreement/partnership with Zijin. Zijin will not have any part of Manono nor will they have anything to do with Manono!!!!
Zijin can go and get fu.ked!
Good luck to everyone as this hasn't been easy, but hopefully we are nearing the finish line!
Until next time,
Cheers Nells xxx
We are approaching 10 months suspended . This may seem like a stupid question , but is time a factor for AVZ ? Are we good for another 12 - 18 months of battle ?I have mentioned this before, but i would really like to call Zijin bluff and stay the course with the April 2023 ICC arbitration, maybe they will pull out if they realise the weight of evidence is against them ( IGF report, AVZ strong documentation ) one of Chinas fallibility is they dont like getting embarrassed on the world stage, its a open court proceeding, not their preferred option, MMCS got embarrassed even tho no ruling as yet......
Will China risk a second dose ?
ICC arbitration is only 41 days away as per Spikerama daily count...........not that far away.
There is still plenty of time to "compromise" after the initial hearing, should matters not be as clear cut ....
One way or another, you would want to see a path way to construction of RD no later than June.
imo
Mentally no, financially.. maybeWe are approaching 10 months suspended . This may seem like a stupid question , but is time a factor for AVZ ? Are we good for another 12 - 18 months of battle ?
What battle?We are approaching 10 months suspended . This may seem like a stupid question , but is time a factor for AVZ ? Are we good for another 12 - 18 months of battle ?
Battle may not be the right word , but someone wants what we have and we are trying to stop them from getting it .What battle?
I very much doubt AVZ are communicating in any way with zijin other than telling Cominiere that they need to sort their shit out with Zijin and get the project rolling…I mentioned this type of proposal a fair while ago now, before the bribery news broke ( Zijin & Cominiere )
But it also included Zijin compensating AVZ a percentage for capital works already under taken to get RD to the DFS stage, which ultimately got 3 favourable opinions to be awarded the original ML decree.
That proposal should also include Zijin paying full market value for the 15%, not the pissant $33m which they have only paid a deposit for snacks at this stage
Having Zijin in the equation makes my gut wrench, but it does provide a pathway regards to " harmonious relations " within Dathcom and get RD moving in the right direction towards construction / production if the agreements are iron clad and irrevocable.
But we also have the Dathomir drama with the other 15% dispute, which is slated to go thru ICC arbitration too...
How does AVZ navigate that horse shit ?
Do we have a outcome of the MMCS dispute yet ?
So many moving parts to this crappola situation it makes my head spin !!
9.3 months to go before DRC elections.........
2.2 months to go to " celebrate " 12 months of extended suspension.......
What a fucking glowing endorsement for other international coys to invest in DRC hey ?
NOT !!
imo
So if it goes to the ICC it means Zijin and the other Corrupt players don't give a f--k about the verdict . This is why I think it is a bad sign if this ICC case goes ahead . The next 40 days are key . IMOI very much doubt AVZ are communicating in any way with zijin other than telling Cominiere that they need to sort their shit out with Zijin and get the project rolling…
harmonious relations is only between shareholders of which Zijin legally are not … all that is in that pot, is Dathcom , AVZ , Cominiere and possibly Dathomir .
Zijin only conjured ICC up, in order to try and force a position for themselves at the negotiating table ; Zijins issue lies with Cominiere not AVZ ; AVZ have ROFR, it should be Cominiere that should be bringing AVZ to ICC if they have acted above board and are certain AVZ is blocking the sale; of which Zijin have only ever paid a ‘deposit’ …no sale has crossed the line.
At this stage in my view ; AVZ would be nuts to entertain anything from Zijin unless it had real financial benefit / clout to the project ; we’ve been suspended 10 months ; walk with then into ICC if they wish….
It will be interesting to see what Zijins considers their case is and what the mechanics they are running on ; I reckon it will be a wet bag of shit that Zijin , Cominiere , MoP etc would prefer never to be opened as the only thing it’s going to burn up, is a lot of reputations excluding that of AVZ; it also potentially widens the avenues up even more so , for AVZ to seek significant damages from Cominiere /Zijin ; let the lawyers become another source of revenue to the Dathcom project imo.
A couple of months I’d have been on the side of ‘let’s negotiate with Zijin’ ; it’s now March 23… ICC April 23 .. unless the board have been advised by their legal eagles to possibly consider negotiating the 15% I say fuck them and march straight to ICC.
I think the harmonious discussions need to be happening between Zijin / Cominiere and certain ministers and the best thing they can do is say amongst themselves is that ye we had a good shot at trying to steal the Manono project , but it hasn’t gone to plan and attempts to lure AVZ to the table with legal threats hasn’t worked ; but we really need to cut our loses here and pull the hand break on this ICC event which will highly likely expose how corrupt all these parties involved against AVZ have been and legal cases are likely to roll out of the AVZ legal team in gathering damages and winks
I am with you Wombat, we need to have this sorted out before ICC. On the news front, it's extremely quiet both good/bad. We can safely assume some serious discussions are taking place behind doors.So if it goes to the ICC it means Zijin and the other Corrupt players don't give a f--k about the verdict . This is why I think it is a bad sign if this ICC case goes ahead . The next 40 days are key . IMO
Well said @obe wan couldn't agree more. I first rang warning bells about Z early last year, and still have the mantra Z in, X outI very much doubt AVZ are communicating in any way with zijin other than telling Cominiere that they need to sort their shit out with Zijin and get the project rolling…
harmonious relations is only between shareholders of which Zijin legally are not … all that is in that pot, is Dathcom , AVZ , Cominiere and possibly Dathomir .
Zijin only conjured ICC up, in order to try and force a position for themselves at the negotiating table ; Zijins issue lies with Cominiere not AVZ ; AVZ have ROFR, it should be Cominiere that should be bringing AVZ to ICC if they have acted above board and are certain AVZ is blocking the sale; of which Zijin have only ever paid a ‘deposit’ …no sale has crossed the line.
At this stage in my view ; AVZ would be nuts to entertain anything from Zijin unless it had real financial benefit / clout to the project ; we’ve been suspended 10 months ; walk with then into ICC if they wish….
It will be interesting to see what Zijins considers their case is and what the mechanics they are running on ; I reckon it will be a wet bag of shit that Zijin , Cominiere , MoP etc would prefer never to be opened as the only thing it’s going to burn up, is a lot of reputations excluding that of AVZ; it also potentially widens the avenues up even more so , for AVZ to seek significant damages from Cominiere /Zijin ; let the lawyers become another source of revenue to the Dathcom project imo.
A couple of months I’d have been on the side of ‘let’s negotiate with Zijin’ ; it’s now March 23… ICC April 23 .. unless the board have been advised by their legal eagles to possibly consider negotiating the 15% I say fuck them and march straight to ICC.
I think the harmonious discussions need to be happening between Zijin / Cominiere and certain ministers and the best thing they can do is say amongst themselves is that ye we had a good shot at trying to steal the Manono project , but it hasn’t gone to plan and attempts to lure AVZ to the table with legal threats hasn’t worked ; but we really need to cut our loses here and pull the hand break on this ICC event which will highly likely expose how corrupt all these parties involved against AVZ have been and legal cases are likely to roll out of the AVZ legal team in gathering damages and winks
My point is not that I want Zijin in ICC above anything else .. I just don’t want AVZ to give them anything unless we don’t have any choice.I am with you Wombat, we need to have this sorted out before ICC. On the news front, it's extremely quiet both good/bad. We can safely assume some serious discussions are taking place behind doors.
The strategy is all about time IMO. It‘s about our adversaries putting in place obstacle after obstacle to chew up time in the hope that:My point is not that I want Zijin in ICC above anything else .. I just don’t want AVZ to give them anything unless we don’t have any choice.
It’s up to Zijin to decide how much of a hole in the head they want to be to all the parties which are likely to get exposed including themselves ; ideally they’d just pull the pin on the ICC case and decide that their pressure cookers didn’t have the desired effect ….
This old news article gives a bit more insight into Zijin's arguments. Worth reading again imo.So AVZ tables evidence of corruption, breach of contract etc and state their position that Zijin have no legal basis to claim anything.Not trying to be inflammatory, just this would be the logical outcome. How can their be any other result unless Zijin have information that we have not been given?
To your last point there, it's conceivable that China, playing the long game, would sponsor DRC media activity to elect whoever they want to become their political puppet for the next presidential term (legally or through corrupt means). Worth keeping an eye on this, although I'm unsure what one could do to change it.The strategy is all about time IMO. It‘s about our adversaries putting in place obstacle after obstacle to chew up time in the hope that:
Arseholes.
- We give up or cede ground
- We run out of cash
- There is some cataclysmic event e.g. ASX delisting, a helpful EGM outcome
- There is a change of government to one more willing to do China’s evil bidding.
I think it is more likely than not.To your last point there, it's conceivable that China, playing the long game, would sponsor DRC media activity to elect whoever they want to become their political puppet for the next presidential term (legally or through corrupt means). Worth keeping an eye on this, although I'm unsure what one could do to change it.