AVZ Discussion 2022

[JNRB]

Two things:

1. What a steaming pile of rancid word-salad this is:
“They are willing to take effective measures to further develop mutually beneficial and win-win cooperation, to make a tangible and tangible contribution to economic development and to improving the business climate of the DRC.”

What effective measures? Quitting their graft and corruption? Paying their dues? Obeying the law?

2. I notice that they don’t address the substance of the accusations and offer only platitudes and vaguely threatening words.

What a bunch of arseholes.

it's a rough translation.

In chinese, a "win-win cooperation" isn't where both parties benefit, it's where someone 'cooperates' to help the chinese win-win twice.

 

[Winenut]

Nigel mentioned at the roadshows that CATH would be willing to go down to 9% saying they're more concerned with getting product than ownership.

Also a mention that they would potentially still be willing to finance 24% of the project despite only a 9% interest if my shonky memory serves me correctly

Spot on that sentiment was securing supply as a priority.....not the % of ownership of the project

 

[Samus]

The investigations of @IgfRdc @ALINGETEJULES_K on the management of the major tolls in the DRC by Simon Cong MaoHuai made the Chinese in the country tremble, who wrote to PR05 @fatshi13 @Presidence_RDC
in panic. Also investigate its JVs with Comimiere, etc (NGOs)

@JAG

 

[investinvest]

I've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?

My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?

IMO DYOR

 

[ptlas]

I've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?

My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?

IMO DYOR

Email AVZ and ask Ferguson.

 

[Chilla]

I've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?

My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?

IMO DYOR

Go to the AJN web page and click on Investors and then Stock Price….it takes you to the CSE listing page. It is still public listed and it’s status is Active. Must be a glitch on your MarketWatch page.

 

[Xerof]

I've been checking MarketWatch occasionally to monitor AJN share price. It seems that it's recently changed within the last week from being a publicly-listed company to a private company. Any thoughts?

My first thoughts were:
1. Maybe MarketWatch got it wrong.
2. It's easier for AJN to hide misbehaviours being a private company.
3. How does this affect their proposed JV with DRC to form Congo Ressources now that the company structure has changed? Or are there factors/issues with the proposed JV or legal issues with some of their execs/directors necessitating the change in company structure?

IMO DYOR

Still on the CSE as far as the CSE website shows

https://thecse.com/en/listings/mining/ajn-resources-inc

Chilla beat me by 'that much'

It hasn't traded since March 1st - so can confirm Nige isn't selling

 

[Roon]

Think about it this way , within the next 4 to 6 weeks you are going to know if you've done your doe or not . IMO

I'm not so sure of that. We haven't heard ICC hearing confirmed for any date in April, and in any case it's likely just going to be another procedural hearing with the case probably to be heard down the line. ICC be slooow. I know there's a chance of talking happening in the lead up to ICC if this was just a pressure move by Zijin and they don't wish the case to actually go forward, leading to some sort of negotiated settlement or the Chinese making a more concerted grab through their DRC proxy pressure campaign, but there's likely to still be a fair amount of time to act on that before any ICC embarrassment is envisaged. IMO anyway, I'm hoping your right and we won't even get to the case. (As long as that trends towards a positive outcome at least, lolz.)

 

[wombat74]

I'm not so sure of that. We haven't heard ICC hearing confirmed for any date in April, and in any case it's likely just going to be another procedural hearing with the case probably to be heard down the line. ICC be slooow. I know there's a chance of talking happening in the lead up to ICC if this was just a pressure move by Zijin and they don't wish the case to actually go forward, leading to some sort of negotiated settlement or the Chinese making a more concerted grab through their DRC proxy pressure campaign, but there's likely to still be a fair amount of time to act on that before any ICC embarrassment is envisaged. IMO anyway, I'm hoping your right and we won't even get to the case. (As long as that trends towards a positive outcome at least, lolz.)

I'm hopeful of a resolution before it gets to the ICC . Nigel knows time and money are not on our side .There is also the chance that if something cannot be sorted the MoM will pull it completely (In The Nation's Best Interest ). I think if all the cards were going to fall in our favour it would have happened by now . IMO

 

[Panther22]

Nigel mentioned at the roadshows that CATH would be willing to go down to 9% saying they're more concerned with getting product than ownership.

I think Nigel said CATH could go to 9% so long as they were guaranteed at least 50% of production but then again Nigel said a lot of things ...........

 

[Mickyb64]

I'm hopeful of a resolution before it gets to the ICC . Nigel knows time and money are not on our side .There is also the chance that if something cannot be sorted the MoM will pull it completely (In The Nations Best Interest ). I think if all the cards were going to fall in our favour it would have happened by now . IMO

If this isn't resolved before the ICC hearing this will drag out for another 6 months. Once it hits court/arbitration it will get bogged down. I'm hoping something happens beforehand.

 

[Bin59]

Text from the conversation between CybelleKamba & WilliamKande2

While the #PR05 @Fatshii13
Decides to fight corruption, there are some deputies who agree to be taken care of by the #Chinese to ensure their campaigns and in turn stifle the $AVZ file, #lithium_Manono.

N.B: nothing is taken for granted



William:

William:

 

[MoneyBags1348]

@Sammael and @Winenut
CATH are substantial holders in Lithium Plus who have continued accumulating shares so they are still getting the benefits from increased ownership

@wombat74 you were complaining last year about @Nellie17 and @The Fox speculating on good news, and at the same time all you ever do is speculate on bad news.

Apart from that you never actually do any research and you always have an answer back so I figure the only way to not have to listen to your bullshit any longer is to put you on ignore

…. Thank fuck for that

 

[Dazmac66]

@Sammael and @Winenut
CATH are substantial holders in Lithium Plus who have continued accumulating shares so they are still getting the benefits from increased ownership

@wombat74 you were complaining last year about @Nellie17 and @The Fox speculating on good news, and at the same time all you ever do is speculate on bad news.

Apart from that you never actually do any research and you always have an answer back so I figure the only way to not have to listen to your bullshit any longer is to put you on ignore

…. Thank fuck for that

Couldn't agree more with you Bags, he is a whinging, wining, negative naysayer. I sometimes wonder what he is trying to achieve???

 

[Winenut]

Greener day on the general market today

Hope that makes a few out there feel a little better

AVZ very steady as always despite market fluctuations

 

[wombat74]

@Sammael and @Winenut
CATH are substantial holders in Lithium Plus who have continued accumulating shares so they are still getting the benefits from increased ownership

@wombat74 you were complaining last year about @Nellie17 and @The Fox speculating on good news, and at the same time all you ever do is speculate on bad news.

Apart from that you never actually do any research and you always have an answer back so I figure the only way to not have to listen to your bullshit any longer is to put you on ignore

…. Thank fuck for that

Thanks buddy . Finally you put me on ignore . Thank Christ for that . Your constant whinging about other posters not following your own ideas is becoming absurd . I will say I do appreciate the fact you haven't threatened to punch my head in . Cheers for that . All the very best to you Mate . Chow

 

[leo]

I'm looking to sell a parcel of shares off-market, please let me know if you are interested or know someone who might be

 

[Thaz]

I believe that's a paddling for both of you, with a pineapple. @wombat74 and @MoneyBags1348

 

[Bin59]

PDT:

Maja:

PDT:

If AVZ management is negotiating revenues under the new law (referring to the 0.3%) it seems that now we/they can move forward

 

[JAG]

PDT:
View attachment 32199

Maja:
View attachment 32198
PDT:
View attachment 32197



If AVZ management is negotiating revenues under the new law (referring to the 0.3%) it seems that now we/they can move forward

View attachment 32193

The guys is a FN loose cannon and has no idea......Negotiate! Negotiate what.....what is legally ours!!!!

Talked to AVZ for a long time......LMFAO I just fell off my chair!

Like fuck!