Dijon101
Regular
my initial thoughts like a lot of us here was "we're fucked"
Had a shit and a shower and took a few deep breaths and thought through things on a different angle than doom and gloom.
Everyone has taken the view that it's been someone, be it comi, zinjin or such blocking progress to the ML.
What if everyone has gotten it wrong and it was AVZ that did not want to progress to ML as the terms in the ministerial decree were not favorable or to AVZ's liking.
i.e.
The ministerial decree splitting of 13359 was not to the liking of AVZ
and
the ministerial degree progressing 13359 to a PE or mining license with Zinjin as a stakeholder was contrary to AVZ's interests.
hence the statement about ongoing disagreements, conflicts and differences between shareholders that have stalled the project.
For the project to go ahead as per the mining code, with the entirety of 13359 intact and with Zinjin not a stakeholder of Dathcom. Wouldn't these previous ministerial decree's have to be rescinded and then new decree's issued? new decree's that don't split 13359 and don't include Zinjin as a stake holder of Dathcom.
Even if I'm wrong about it being AVZ not being the party stalling the progression to ML. It makes sense to me that if Zinjin got in the back door and AVZ did not want them as a stakeholder, these are the steps they'd have to go down to get Zinjin and any other unwanted stakeholders off the project.
in a nutshell "we (AVZ) are not going to production or moving forward with Zinjin as a stakeholder"
Had a shit and a shower and took a few deep breaths and thought through things on a different angle than doom and gloom.
Everyone has taken the view that it's been someone, be it comi, zinjin or such blocking progress to the ML.
What if everyone has gotten it wrong and it was AVZ that did not want to progress to ML as the terms in the ministerial decree were not favorable or to AVZ's liking.
i.e.
The ministerial decree splitting of 13359 was not to the liking of AVZ
and
the ministerial degree progressing 13359 to a PE or mining license with Zinjin as a stakeholder was contrary to AVZ's interests.
hence the statement about ongoing disagreements, conflicts and differences between shareholders that have stalled the project.
For the project to go ahead as per the mining code, with the entirety of 13359 intact and with Zinjin not a stakeholder of Dathcom. Wouldn't these previous ministerial decree's have to be rescinded and then new decree's issued? new decree's that don't split 13359 and don't include Zinjin as a stake holder of Dathcom.
Even if I'm wrong about it being AVZ not being the party stalling the progression to ML. It makes sense to me that if Zinjin got in the back door and AVZ did not want them as a stakeholder, these are the steps they'd have to go down to get Zinjin and any other unwanted stakeholders off the project.
in a nutshell "we (AVZ) are not going to production or moving forward with Zinjin as a stakeholder"