AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
LOCKY82
Regular
Good man Jakob you've just bumped the price up
Winenut
Go AVZ!
Absolutely 100%
I have it on good authority that the dropping of ICC/ICSID cases has been designated as the very "last" item to be executed in the series of events to complete the Manono transaction
And this specifically only occurs "after" proceed funds have been distributed to all AVZ shareholders and the booking of my holiday to Abruzzo, Umbria and Puglia is completed and flights and accommodation confirmed......
Last edited:
PutUsernameHere
Regular
I can see the error of my ways, and I accept I have zero logical thoughts! Please do enlighten us all J. What have you come across in said upcoming offer? What have those more enlightened told you? Do we all need to brace?I know there was no point where any logical thought occurred. My question was rhetorical.
Have I read much else you ask? Well, I have read enough to know that the Avenger's post that you originally quoted referred to $29.75b gross revenue for the LIFE OF THE MINE. Therefore there would be no intelligent reason to multiply that figure by 29.
I am on the light side. I am excited by what figure we might ACTUALLY get, not made up figures with no bearing in reality or logic.
I must say it is ironic that you question my constructive input, the best things I could post and what I have read, given your own recent posts.
As it happens I read a fair bit. I read a lot more than I write. I ask key questions to those who may have valuable information (this post is not one of those times).
Maybe in these discussions I have come across more information than you about the upcoming offer.
Or will you just make some vague, conceited comment about how you're better than us and so you couldn't possibly share what you know?
RHyNO
Regular
Have to say it and really interested to get some insight outside of the screaming troll responses that usually accompany any significant questions that are hurty. If trump is tearing agreements with EU and withdrawing from agreements. What’s stopping him and crew from just taking this at DRCs opinion that these courts don’t exist and neither does our “good legal title” what would make them honour our first right of refusal?
And where have everyone else's expectations come from?Probably anyone with a brain
When the revenue figure of $840b (or $300b for that matter) in your post was SO far away from anyone else's expectation, was there ever a point in the thought process where you went...hang on...there might be a fundamental error in the methodology/calculation here?
From anonymous interweb posters, who because they have been posting for a few years, usually inaccurate guesses, have some sort of kudos or common belief that they're on the inside track.
The other attempts to manipulate the price down comes from those who want their purchase price lower.
So yes, 'SO far away from anyone else's expectation' because she's using her brain and not being a sheep.
Unless trump wants to dig up Manono with his own tools, he's going to need a legitimate mining firm involved. Those firms are beholden to ICSID decisions.
Skar
Regular
Once money hits our Australian bank account only then should we drop cases.... as even when money is in escrow on a completed transaction, it still seems problematic for us.Absolutely 100%
I have it on good authority that the dropping of ICC/ICSID cases has been designated as the very "last" item to be executed in the series of events to complete the Manono transaction
And this specifically only occurs "after" proceed funds have been distributed to all AVZ shareholders and the booking of my holiday to Abruzzo, Umbria and Puglia is completed and flights and accommodation confirmed......
LEFOOL
Regular
You mean your holiday to Montepulciano, Sangiovese and PrimitivoAbsolutely 100%
I have it on good authority that the dropping of ICC/ICSID cases has been designated as the very "last" item to be executed in the series of events to complete the Manono transaction
And this specifically only occurs "after" proceed funds have been distributed to all AVZ shareholders and the booking of my holiday to Abruzzo, Umbria and Puglia is completed and flights and accommodation confirmed......
Winenut
Go AVZ!
I think that's sort of what I was saying.... "And this specifically only occurs "after" proceed funds have been distributed to all AVZ shareholders"
But I was only being serious.... then half joking...... so I get no-one really pays too much attention to what I say
RHyNO
Regular
Thanks mate sincerely!
Hodlandwin69
Regular
Wha
What are observations?
Spikerama
Regular
It's probably just responses related to the procedural matters. Maybe DRC requested certain things not transpire or arguing some crap delay tactics and AVZ has the opportunity to respond to these requests.
Sounds like DRC has said there is no jurisdiction to be hearing the case in international court. I think remember that from last time.
Similar threads
