There will be a memorandum in Sweden 1Q/25 on the re-authorisation of uranium mining. Talga is also on the list of those to be consulted, along with 70 others.
The issue is by no means just about uranium. I have now read several times that rare earths are often found together with uranium and that mining them makes things even more scarce because of the ban on uranium.
PDF:
Talga was also consulted in this topic.
This reminds me of the Cementa case, where the Greens
* also took legal action against an industry, which did Sweden far more harm than good. If someone has the right thing in mind and sets the wrong thing in motion, I think. Cementa argued that they want to play a leading role in the decarbonisation of cement production. If lime mining is banned with this trick (the Greens had simply declared the area to a Natura2000 site retrospectively)
**, Sweden is not only making itself totally dependent, but is also shifting its responsibility to others who are not taking it so seriously. Somehow, everything is analogue.
It's a shame that such counterproductive things are repeatedly implemented. It doesn't help anyone, and certainly not this orientation if it is not re-elected.
"Uranium ban lifted: welcome and logical step towards self-sufficiency
It is proposed that it will once again be possible to mine uranium in Sweden. This was made clear when the government presented a proposal for amended legislation on Friday.
- ‘It is a reasonable conclusion, uranium is both a common and sought-after element. It has been a waste of resources to be forced to handle uranium as waste instead of utilising it,’ says Maria Sunér, CEO of Svemin.
The ban on uranium mining was introduced in 2018 and has led to promising mining projects being cancelled or delayed because uranium is present together with other metals. Uranium inevitably accompanies the extraction of other minerals but currently needs to be treated as a waste.
- The ban has therefore slowed down the potential extraction of highly relevant metals that are crucial for the climate transition, such as vanadium, nickel and rare earth elements,’ says Maria Sunér.
‘The opportunities to extract these metals are now increasing.
- ‘We also believe that the removal of the ban will make exploration in Sweden more attractive. The fact that uranium can now be utilised as a product instead of waste strengthens the economic conditions for future mining projects,’ says Maria Sunér.
The issue must also be seen in a geopolitical light. Sweden and the rest of the EU are heavily dependent on imports of many metals, including uranium. The European Commission has been clear that domestic production of critical raw materials needs to be strengthened.
It would also be illogical to maintain the ban on uranium mining at a time when nuclear power is a major source of energy in Sweden. For the foreseeable future, we will be dependent on uranium being mined somewhere. Moreover, Swedish bedrock contains more than a quarter of the EU's known uranium resources.
The proposal reinstates uranium as a concession mineral under the Minerals Act, and removes the prohibition on mining uranium in Chapter 9 of the Environmental Code. It is also proposed that a licence from the Government will no longer be required for uranium mining (Chapter 17 of the Environmental Code).
- The proposal means that uranium will now be handled in the same way as other licence minerals, which is logical. A thorough environmental assessment with strict requirements will of course be carried out,’ says Maria Sunér.
FACTS - the proposal
Since 2018, it is prohibited to explore or mine uranium, i.e. the substance uranium ceased to be a so-called concession mineral. In February 2024, the government set up a literal inquiry to look into how the ban could be removed.
The Minister for Climate and Environment decides on an inquiry to abolish the ban on uranium mining - Regeringen.se
In the proposal that is now being submitted for consultation, uranium is reintroduced as a so-called concession mineral in the Minerals Act and the explicit ban on exploration and mining of uranium in Chapter 6 of the Environmental Code is removed. The requirement for government approval for uranium mining is also removed from Chapter 17 of the Environmental Code.
For nuclear activities, the requirement for permission from the government remains, which also requires the approval of the municipality concerned (so-called municipal veto)
.
The referral must be answered by 20 March 2025
FACTS - how uranium occurs in the Swedish bedrock
Uranium is a metallic element, the heaviest found in nature. The average content in the Earth's crust is just over 2 grams of uranium per tonne (0.0002%). This means that uranium is about 500 times more common than gold and as common as tin. The average uranium content of the richest mines in the world is around 2%. The highest levels of uranium, close to 20%, are found in a few deposits in Canada. Large quantities of uranium are found in Swedish soil, but the levels are low. In the 1960s, a Swedish uranium mine was opened in Ranstad. The operation was closed because it was unprofitable.
On sgu.se there is a FAQ about uranium, read
more there."
https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/svemin/pressreleases/uranfoerbudet-slopas-vaelkommet-och-logiskt-steg-foer-oekad-sjaelvfoersoerjning-3361814
For better understanding:
"Uranium mining has been banned in Sweden since 2018, but the opposition parties are in favour of reintroducing it.
Disagreement between parties over uranium mining in Sweden
Published Monday, 29 August
2022 at 12:15
- The right-wing opposition parties all say they want to abolish the current ban on uranium mining in Sweden, according to a poll of parliamentary factions by Swedish Radio News.
- The red-green parties, but also the centre party, want the ban to remain in place.
- Uranium is used as fuel in nuclear power plants, and since 2018 it has been illegal to mine uranium in Sweden because its radioactive properties pose a risk to the environment."
Тhe right-wing opposition parties all say they want to get rid of the current ban on uranium mining in Sweden, according to a survey from Swedish Radio ...
www.sverigesradio.se
"Uranium mining could be banned - long-awaited bill in Kumla
Published 2 March
2018
Several times, foreign mining companies have applied to test drill in Kvarntorpshögen in search of uranium. Now a new bill could put a stop to that.
Sweden's largest uranium deposits are found in Kvarntorpshögen, in the form of uranium-rich alum shale, and several times foreign-based mining companies have applied to test drill in Kumla in search of uranium.
Government wants to make it ‘crystal clear’
The municipality has repeatedly turned to the government to prevent uranium mining, and now a new government bill could put an end to such plans once and for all.
- ‘With the proposed legislation, the government wants to make it crystal clear that uranium mining will no longer be allowed in Sweden,’ says Environment Minister Karolina Skog
*.
*MP Green Party
No licences
Amendments to the Environmental Code and the Minerals Act will mean that it will no longer be possible to obtain a licence to start a uranium mine or extract uranium from mining waste.
This also means that it will not be possible to obtain a licence to mine, test mine, process or physically or chemically enrich uranium in order to use the radioactivity of the material.
Could be ready in August
Uranium is used as fuel in nuclear power plants and is commonly found in Swedish bedrock. Today, it is possible to extract uranium in Sweden and in recent years there has been extensive exploration for uranium.
However, experts believe that there are environmental risks associated with mining uranium. Among other things, there is a risk of the spread of harmful metals, which can affect the reproduction of fish or lead to their death.
The amendments to the law, which are now being submitted to the Legislative Council, are proposed to enter into force on 1 August 2018."
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/orebro/regeringen-vill-forbjuda-utvinning-av-uran"
_____________________
** A new attempt or if not intentionally and unconsciously, then they have learned nothing from the Cementa case and the crisis:
Press release- 12 June 2024
"Svemin - Bästeträsk National Park increases Sweden's vulnerability
Protection of valuable nature is an important measure to preserve natural and cultural environments. Svemin is not opposed to a new national park on Gotland, but when it comes to the concrete proposal now put forward by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency for the Bästeträsk area, the scope must be changed. The proposal must go back to the drawing board so that Sweden's security of supply of so-called ultra-pure limestone is not jeopardised.
Within the proposed national park are some of Sweden's best limestone deposits. This is not limestone used by the cement industry - which is also on the island - but in the designated area there is limestone of a uniquely high quality used for liming lakes and purifying drinking water, as a soil amendment for agriculture, for steel production and for flue gas cleaning. This is why it was designated as a national interest for valuable substances and materials back in 2005. In the justification, SGU pointed out that
‘...the Stucks limestone deposit is well known through geological and geophysical surveys and very important from a supply point of view.’
However, with the current draft design and proposed regulations, the national park would make all extraction of limestone impossible, which would jeopardise Sweden's security of supply in the near future.
- The limestone deposits in this area of northern Gotland are unique to Sweden, being of a very high quality. There are no known similar deposits outside Gotland. I would like to emphasise that these are really important deposits for society and that this type of limestone cannot be replaced by other materials,’ says Katarina Nilsson, PhD in bedrock geology and head of research and supply preparedness at Svemin.
The proposed national park thus poses a long-term threat to Sweden's security of supply and will lead to increased emissions of greenhouse gases, NOx and sulphur when domestic production has to be replaced by imports that require long-distance transport. Increased import dependency at a time when geopolitical tensions are rising in our neighbourhood is not desirable.
A national park in this area could also have a negative impact on Finland. Since the second half of the 20th century, northern Gotland has been of great importance for Finland's supply of limestone.
- From a NATO perspective, the resilience of both countries‘ industries and communities would be reduced if the plans for the Bästeträsk National Park are realised as currently proposed,’ says Katarina Nilsson.
- Finland, like mainland Sweden, has a bedrock with limited access to sedimentary limestone that can be processed in today's energy-efficient lime kilns.
Svemin therefore questions the
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency's assessment that the proposed national park is compatible with designated national interests for valuable substances and materials.
- A national park is the strongest protection an area can receive. This new national park is proposed to be located directly adjacent to several national interest areas relating to lime. ‘As the regulations are designed, with for example wording on the prohibition of hydrological impact, it is obvious that a national park would prevent all lime mining not only inside the national park but also in the vicinity of the national park,’ says Tobias Kluge, industry lawyer at Svemin.
What needs to be done now?
- ‘As I said, we are not against a national park, but since this one is proposed to go right up to the border of already existing national interests and thus in practice makes operations impossible, functioning buffer zones would need to be created so that the socially important deposits of ultra-pure lime can continue to secure Sweden's security of supply,’ says Tobias Kluge.
How extensive would these buffer zones need to be?
- ‘This would need to be investigated in more detail, the important thing is that the lime operations can be future-proofed, both for us here in Sweden and for our neighbour Finland,’ says Tobias Kluge.
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency's proposal for a national park on northern Gotland is thus a potentially harmful proposal for Sweden's security of supply. Svemin therefore calls on the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency to withdraw and revise the proposal, so that the boundaries of the park can be changed in a way that ensures Sweden's security of supply and raw material supply.