AVZ Discussion 2022

RHyNO

Regular
how does this ding dong get his numbers! The only number in here with absolutely no supporting evidence. Who is putting these details to the media? The lazy pricks who want to pay us SQUAT for our Li. Dream on rio. All time highs at least!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users
Let's not confuse Royalties with Dividends peeps........just sayin'

edit (not directed at you there a.d)
What's the practical difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

aanti.dumb

Regular
Let's not confuse Royalties with Dividends peeps........just sayin'
I agree, just easier for me to wrap by head around.
 

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
What's a more realistic royalty in your opinion?
Good question and you've made me stop to ponder my intitial reaction

The calculation method needs to be considered

Fixed per unit of output, % of revenue, % of net return

Really haven't run the numbers so I think your question is very valid and yeah....I'm not quite sure of the answer

Good point for further discussion and research
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
What's the practical difference?
Franking credits....

EDIT. Possibly.....might depend who or what entity receives the royalty and how it is treated as income in the hands of the recipient
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 4 users
What is concerning is "if all goes well AVZ could on-sell the Manono interest for UP TO 1.5BILLION"
Up to?!?!
Wtaf
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
RIO can take that and fk off.
How does such a number even leak when clearly must be a joke
Jeeze feel like we are in a gangbang.

Getting fucked by everyone, even our own countrymen.

Just goes to show the significance of the resource.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
So now I'm down a rabbit hole on Royalties thanks to RIO and the Australian and a US Special Envoy :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users
So now I'm down a rabbit hole on Royalties :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Please share your wisdom with us when you are done and what you think would be a reasonable estimate of royalties
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
Jeeze feel like we are in a gangbang.

Getting fucked by everyone, even our own countrymen.

Just goes to show the significance of the resource.
Look actually the real question is,

Will we reach 3000 pages of thread before a deal is cut?
🧐
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 19 users
This also contradicts Graeme's LinkedIn post
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 6 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
What is concerning is "if all goes well AVZ could on-sell the Manono interest for UP TO 1.5BILLION"
Up to?!?!
Wtaf
Totally agree

That's just a seriously fucked up and wrong and broken number to have published IMO
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

Mute22

Regular
The fact the article has no source is very telling.

This could just be an outcome the journalist came to themselves on the back of a napkin.

Most likely, RIO is leaking lowball offers to build a narrative, to what end? It's all part of the games being played to lower expectations.

The FUD agents are going to have a field day.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 15 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
This is about as low-balled as a 90 year olds low balls.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 13 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
Please share your wisdom with us when you are done and what you think would be a reasonable estimate of royalties
Happy to share something but not sure I'd go so far as to call it wisdom :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 7 users
AVZ and KoBold representatives want to nail down a deal on the future of the southern portion of the Manono deposit from the talks starting on Tuesday. If all goes well, AVZ could on-sell the Manono interest for up to $US1.5bn ($2.38bn) plus a royalty. But there is no assurance of any outcome, favourable or otherwise.
$0.675 AUD per share + royalties.

Sounds like we get royally screwed, I really hope that's not true. I would rather go to court.

Is this RIO buttering up a lowball offer?

Maybe this is what RIO has put forward, but I really hope NF isn't entertaining this.
0.47c after tax

Surely 'AVZ representatives' aren't considering this as it is well below Nigel's minimum valuation of $2.5b USD at the AGM

That isn't a commercial enough offer to win the required shareholder vote even with a royalty imo
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 28 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
0.47c after tax

Surely 'AVZ representatives' aren't considering this as it is well below Nigel's minimum valuation of $2.5b USD at the AGM

That isn't a commercial enough offer to win the required shareholder vote even with a royalty imo
Stupid low ball shit but the tax outcome (whatever the sale price) will vary from holder to holder depending on how it's held, where it's held, personal circumstances, income levels, size of holdings (so resulting potential profit size), whether it's a share sale attracting CGT rules and possible 50% discount etc etc

But prima facie 67.5c is just fucking bullshit and I agree nowhere near commercial enough to get shareholder suppot
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 19 users

JNRB

Regular
Totally agree

That's just a seriously fucked up and wrong and broken number to have published IMO
I went back and re-read it and we're all getting worked up over a simple misunderstanding.

Clearly what heas saying is 1.5B per share, which i am ok with.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 26 users

BRICK

Where’s Zeebot 😶‍🌫️
I went back and re-read it and we're all getting worked up over a simple misunderstanding.

Clearly what heas saying is 1.5B per share, which i am ok with.
Or the decimal point is in the wrong place and it’s 15. Billion
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users

Winenut

TROLLS LIVE IN BASEMENTS WITH THEIR MUMS
Is it April 10th yet???......
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Thinking
Reactions: 11 users
Top Bottom