Why is it that we cannot sell Skida to data centres. Years ago it was stated that we could reduce power by 90%. Surely any data base would be willing to reduce their power costs.
Server farms are dominated by the likes of NVIDIA.
While the players in that space are making killer $ over and above "power costs", there's minimal incentive given the outlay to change.
How easy do you think it is to roll back the existing frameworks and infrastructure to just "pop" Akida in?
The testing, the algorithms, models etc all needing to be written to operate efficiently on SNN and with comparable output performance to the existing processing to minimise disruption to traffic and processing.
It would take small incremental steps to build up.
Where the catalyst is coming on that front though is the uptake of edge processing imo.
As that momentum increases and more and more devices, manufacturers, people move their data processing to more secure, private processing at the edge then the traffic and reliance on massive GPU, power hungry data centres will diminish.
Data centres will always be there but the revenue and growth will ease back.
I have absolutely no doubt that players like NVIDIA etc will all be milking these centres for all their worth while they can and in the background be also exploring edge solutions or edge server (hub) set ups.
They won't commit or show their hands till they have to and a cross over point eventuates. The law of diminishing returns.
In the meantime, the edge is where it appears a large portion of startups, disruptive tech (SNN / quantum / hybrid) and some mature device manufacturers (Qualcomm) are already creating solutions.
We need to continue to develop and mature the Akida product suite, and solutions they offer, in line with client needs / suggestions (as end users) and to keep pace with the evolving edge market and competitors.
No one can deny we need solid deals and revenue sooner than later now to grow and something must begin to happen on that front, absolutely.
However, we are also a bit at the mercy of a developing end use market (edge) that many companies are either not ready to adopt, don't need to yet, are still trying to figure out where that fits in their industry / business, are triailing, testing, creating algos, models etc etc before the uptake really expands.
Can I say BRN will ultimately be successful, nope.
Can I say that the tech appears to be getting more and more coverage, a growing ecosystem, making some inroads, has opportunities developing, increasing interest from companies, yep.
It's not the wanted situation but it is where it's at currently imo.
So I just continue to assess where I'm at personally with exposure etc while this all happens and act according to my own plans. I accept I can't influence a wider mkt, be that stock or tech, so I work in my sphere of control with what I can actually influence.
..
!!
to get my Brother, to average down his holdings (something that I just had too much uncertainty about, just a few days ago).
