BRN Discussion Ongoing

[perceptron]

Would the listing be on the Nasdaq? Are we supposed to have revenue before then?

 

[TheDrooben]

I would have preferred a dual listing in the first place........yes there are more fees etc to be on two exchanges but it would have been more palatable. Better than a delisting and redomicile to US and we get nothing which I have noticed with a few companies recently. Shorters look like they will have a field day AGAIN tomorrow.....unless something else drops

 

[Cardpro]

Hmm, I was disappointed that there were no surprises in the annual statement but... baam!!!...I wonder what will happen tomorrow...

I wonder how they will close the open short positions, it looked like there is nearly 4% open short positions...

 

[genyl]

The big money is in the US. No future for us in the ASX, if we got ambitions. Great move.

 

[Tothemoon24]

I didn’t think we met the requirements to be listed , for the company to announce this wishful intent I’m obviously wrong ….. or has there been some doors pushed open via higher governing bodies

 

[uiux]

Hey Uiux, what do you think about our Annual Report?

It's hard to understand.

What do they mean by
the Australian R&D team handed redundancies and
no third-party pre-development services incurred in the current period (2023: $636,493)

They closed the perth research office and moved people to the US

 

[Fenris78]

I didn’t think we met the requirements to be listed , for the company to announce this wishful intent I’m obviously wrong ….. or has their been some doors pushed open via higher governing bodies

They always said we don't need china.... you may be right here... whells could have been greased in the name of national security????

 

[Justchilln]

Would the listing be on the Nasdaq? Are we supposed to have revenue before then?

No brn does not meet the requirements not even close

 

[TheDrooben]

Would the listing be on the Nasdaq? Are we supposed to have revenue before then?

They must be confident we can meet the requirements before the timeframe announced.......

 

[Rskiff]

Maybe a $$$ payment into Trumps account or his dodgy crypto coins greased the wheels

 

[Stabinski]

This link should answer questions for interested parties. www.listingcenter.nasdaq.com

 

[perceptron]

They must be confident we can meet the requirements before the timeframe announced.......

It seems that way.

 

[Iseki]

They closed the perth research office and moved people to the US

I was going to apply as a volunteer. I guess that's out now.

 

[toasty]

They always said we don't need china.... you may be right here... whells could have been greased in the name of national security????

I think you might have hit the nail on the head. The US military is obviously very interested in what we've got and our product will be MUCH easier for them to procure if BRN is a US company. Remember who's in the Whitehouse now. Im sure Trump would "convince" the SEC to allow BRN into the market so that Defence can source our unique technology from a US company..............

 

[davidfitz]

I feel sorry for the people with the BRN licence plates . On a more serious note I am concerned that my early retirement plans may no longer be achievable .

Let's hope for a miracle between now and the inevitable!

 

[toasty]

And if the future is very defence related, I wonder if that had any impact of Anil's decision to sell??

 

[TheDrooben]

Well for all those who complained about a lack of announcements........can't complain now.....

 

[Cardpro]

If I were to speculate, perhaps they have secured a deal involving the U.S. military, or big corporate and remaining listed on the ASX would require disclosures that they’d prefer to avoid under its rules..? Lol...

Otherwise such a random timing....

 

[GazDix]

Regarding the announcement about relocation, I'm uncomfortable about them de-listing on the ASX and re-listing in the US (Nasdaq?) mainly because its inconvenient for me (e.g can't manage position through Commsec etc) and I am also a little concerned about getting equal/fair value in the new US shares. It's just out of my experience and comfort zone but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

However, on the positive side, and this is reflected in the announcement, US markets do have a different approach to valuing tech stocks and are more interested in potential rather than current revenue and that could be good for us in terms of share price.

Thoughts?

I agree with your thoughts Yoda. A bit worried about the whole process, but I am sure that will be taken care of. Haven't had experience with that myself.

Agree with the positive point. The ASX is corrupt and shit too. Also, the SEC in the US is more friendly towards technology companies right now.

But with every ANN, I feel like they raise more questions than answer them. Will we be listed on the NASDAQ? It doesn't mention in the ANN. Or the new stock exchange in Texas that will be opening in 2026 - https://www.txse.com/? It certainly says we are delisting on the OTC, so it surely must be one of the big ones. But right now, there is no way we meet the requirements....
So? Are we merging too? Again, I don't feel like all the info is being mentioned. Our top 20 shareholders may have a newcomer (hence the secrecy), so is a takeover on the cards?

Just for transparency I have been minimising my position in BRN for a year or so now but still hold a large bag. I can't deal with the lack of transparency. I like to invest with alpha knowledge and not blind. I know our tech is first rate and appreciate the great research done by contributors on this forum, unfortunately our management is lacking.

After our massive spikes after the Merc news to $2 or whatever it was, that should be a catalyst to keep shorters away, but somehow they can confidentally short a company that can potentially release news that can blow them away. It doesn't and didn't feel right. Maybe the US can solve these problems too. I don't know.
The change in strategy from chips to wholly IP was the wrong one. This isn't 'crying over spilt milk' but it allows the cash burn to increase faster with little revenue therefore creating higher risk. This maybe answers the hidden reason why the US too as it can help us raise more capital as technology VCs are abundant there.

I feel like this move was in the works for a while (remembering an old ANN about expanding headquarters in California), and not releasing non price sensitive anns on the ASX was possibly the beginning of the ASX being painted as a strawman for the company to do so. Maybe they wanted to move sooner of course if more deals were signed.

Overall, I think a move to the US makes sense. But I can't see how we can in our current state.

Best wishes to us long suffering SHs

 

[DingoBorat]

I would have preferred a dual listing in the first place........yes there are more fees etc to be on two exchanges but it would have been more palatable. Better than a delisting and redomicile to US and we get nothing which I have noticed with a few companies recently. Shorters look like they will have a field day AGAIN tomorrow.....unless something else drops

View attachment 78271

Not sure what the shorters will do, but I'm not happy with the news and wanted a Dual Listing, with the same share structure as well.

Tony Dawe, said to me (over the phone or in email) 2 or 3 years ago, that the Company knew shareholders would see anything other than a Dual Listing, as a betrayal.

Current shareholders, likely get their holdings consolidated (by 6 to 7 times at best, assuming AUD1 share price) and then become a fraction of a new pool of shares, is "my" experience in these kind of things.

The Company gets hugely funded and share price and Company progress will likely go much higher, but you lose all the leverage of having "more" shares.