Cruiser maybe you could cut a deal on behalf of the BoD and advise Chyna they can have the entire tennament of 13329 if little old AVZ could just hold onto all of 13359Me thinks it is extremely important, regardless of the position DRC/Zijin takes now, AVZ should go ahead with the arbitration cases and only stop,
if the 13329 tenement is returned to Dathcom, the DRC recognises that AVZ legally owns 75% of Dathcom and Dathcom has the ML for the entire 13329, access to power and water and Zijin removed from the entire 13329 tenement.
The example here:
Suppose Zijin steals my car and caravan, should I be happy, if Zijin gives me my car back, give them a big kiss and invite them to a barbie?
Or should I say if you don't give my caravan back I lodge a complain for stealing my caravan, you have to return my property?
Or if someone steals 1 million from a bank, should the bank be happy and friends with the thief, if he hands half of it back?
Zijin and the DRC have shown, through their actions, that they cannot be trusted and will try anything to disrupt/delay the arbitration cases.
To be extremely honest, taken in consideration that Cath operates under direction of China, I believe their game is part of the Chinese long game and only believe if their actions are fair dinkum by the time AVZ has this all sorted.
Not 1 second before that will I operate "In good faith" with the Chinese fukkers and the corrupt upper class of the DRC.
How the hell can you trust these fukkers?
This comes under 'once bitten, twice shy'.
Totally agree Winenut. We have to pay the fees so that we remain in the que and proposed hearing dates are kept.I've asked this genuine question on the crapper after a post by Amovatio who I greatly respect
I'm not really getting any comments over there not sure if they think I'm being negative or something
Anyhoo I thought I'd pose the question here in relation to AVZ not paying the arbitration fees and letting the action lapse IF the DRC grant AVZ the ML prior to 7th Feb 2025 (I think that's the deadline for the fees to be paid) which is what Amovatio was suggesting
Any thoughts here????
I sort of consider the arbitration a kind of necessary "insurance policy" to keep the fucking DRC to their word until absolutely EVERYTHING is 100% signed sealed delivered and unequivocally ratified in fucking blood!
View attachment 76681
Smart Traveler advice posted yesterday 25/1 by DFAT |
|
Thank you for paying attention.Cruiser maybe you could cut a deal on behalf of the BoD and advise Chyna they can have the entire tennament of 13329 if little old AVZ could just hold onto all of 13359![]()
Which, what, or how consular services?
Smart Traveler advice posted yesterday 25/1 by DFAT
Travel advice update
Democratic Republic of the Congo
08:42 am - 25 January 2025
The security situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is volatile. Conflict in Eastern DRC is escalating, particularly around Goma, North Kivu. If it is safe to do so, leave affected areas while commercial routes remain available. The ability of the Australian Government to deliver consular services to Australians in Eastern DRC is extremely limited. Monitor local media for updates, follow the advice of local authorities, arrange effective personal safety measures and ensure travel documents are up to date.
Any criticism of DRC by Australian Government would also mean some criticism of CCP and that is not going to happen from Labor.Which, what, or how consular services?
I think the big missing link in the AVZ sordid affair is the absolute lack of any presence displayed by the Australian Government.
I have the feeling Penny Wong believes that the DRC is on a different planet.
The PRC knows very well why and how the DRC has to be massaged in every possible way.
Sunday rant over, off to the pub l go for a few Carlton Draughts on this fine Australia Day.
A fucking MEN to that mate.Hopefully we get a payday from AVZ in the foreseeable future so you are not condemned to drinking Carlton Draught forever
I think that it's been proven beyond doubt that DRC, Z and imo, all Chinese in this debacle cannot ever be trusted.I've asked this genuine question on the crapper after a post by Amovatio who I greatly respect
I'm not really getting any comments over there not sure if they think I'm being negative or something
Anyhoo I thought I'd pose the question here in relation to AVZ not paying the arbitration fees and letting the action lapse IF the DRC grant AVZ the ML prior to 7th Feb 2025 (I think that's the deadline for the fees to be paid) which is what Amovatio was suggesting
Any thoughts here????
I sort of consider the arbitration a kind of necessary "insurance policy" to keep the fucking DRC to their word until absolutely EVERYTHING is 100% signed sealed delivered and unequivocally ratified in fucking blood!
View attachment 76681
There are five sentences here, four of which are provable lies.
Hopefully we get a payday from AVZ in the foreseeable future so you are not condemned to drinking Carlton Draught forever
Obviously you fellas haven't had Carlton draught out of the copper beer tanks they've been setting up around the place.A fucking MEN to that mate.