BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
Well, we have an ignore function over here as well....they keep telling me that I work in mysterious ways, but I have my reasons as others can't accept them, all they see is that the string never ends when in hype, so when I make the call that things have gone too far, I wonder some times what is their objective for them? for me is buy low & sell high ...........so be it every man and woman for themselves in that case ...always happy to take profits & enjoy spending them......
Welcome to the club and bye bye forever!
Dolci
Regular
just curious, what's on the other side of the fence............Come on do you think we believe that, must be a reason, but I guess your not going to say
gotta go......just curious, what's on the other side of the fence............
Dolci
Regular
Attachments
Dolci
Regular
I forgot this is the Uprampers Club ........no alternative views........
You should re read my post. Its simply a reply to a post outlining a breakdown of a future offer of $3 per share using information available
Its a reply to some one who
I an very surprised that you do not understand the simple maths involved in the calculations using available information.
I note that you have not presented any substance to back up your statement.
Let me break the simple calculations down again to help you understand.
PE RATIO = Share price divided by Earnings per share. In this case $3 is the Share price, PE ratio used is 30.
Earnings per share therefore = $3 divided by 30 = 10 cents/share.
The buyer is paying =2 billion SOI x $3/share = $6 billion.
EPS of 10 cents/share with a 2 billion SOI = 2,000,000,000 x 10 cents = $200,000,000 earnings.
Sean is on record stating that an IP Model has a net margin of circa 90%.
That implies that a net earnings of $200mill will come from circa $222 million revenue (200mill x (100divided by90)).
So a future $3 offer with an assumption of a reasonable PE growth company 30 and Sean's IP Model of 90% margin the buyer would by paying:
$6 bill for an expected $222 mill pa which translates into an expected $200 mill earnings pa. The buyers gamble is whether it can expand growth rates.
Holders take $3 per share.
You can play with the calculations. All you have to do is change the expected PE ratio, offer amount and Sean's expected net margins.
As i said simple maths. I hope this helps.
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
just wanted to see if you lot relised that the BUS has a flat tyre ....LOL
Like we're going to take anything you say at face value.
We'd have a far greater chance of getting steered in the right direction by a rusty shopping cart with 3 janky wheels.
BrainShit
Regular
Hi @BrainShit,
it strikes me as odd, though, that there isn’t any mention of “neuromorphic”, “Akida” or “BrainChip” in the ANT61 Beacon datasheet (as of 26 June 2024), given our neuromorphic processor was proudly promoted as their Brain’s brain?
On top of the first page, it says Beacon S. Are there different models / sizes?
The rest of the data sheet, however, just refers to it as “the Beacon”.
Who knows? .... I just found an old screenshot. (and added to my previous post)
If I read it, I would say they're goinig to put Akida in the Beacon.
Maybe to much biased...
Attachments
AusEire
Founding Member.
So you got fed up with the other place then? Or did they get fed up with your bullshit? Either way you're here and we're suddenly worse off for it
Its all my fault.
Just a drive by from Dolci.
Dolci dropped in because she got the craps as i accused him/her and other saturation downrampers over on the crapper of being silently/secretly bullish on BRN.
All i said was that downramping posts with a purpose of buying in lower, ie going long was bullish.
Lets face buying to sell higher is by definition bullish. No two ways about that.
So the downramping behavior is a charade hiding a 'closet' bull.
If you were a committed bear you never buy.
Of course it did not go down well.
Just a drive by from Dolci.
Dolci dropped in because she got the craps as i accused him/her and other saturation downrampers over on the crapper of being silently/secretly bullish on BRN.
All i said was that downramping posts with a purpose of buying in lower, ie going long was bullish.
Lets face buying to sell higher is by definition bullish. No two ways about that.
So the downramping behavior is a charade hiding a 'closet' bull.
If you were a committed bear you never buy.
Of course it did not go down well.
Pom down under
Top 20
just curious, what's on the other side of the fence............
Guess your sediment will change shortly and you’ll be posting everything positive about BRN except the management.
Dolci
Regular
nothing wrong with the tech.................... it's just taking too long to get there...........isn't it? As I recall it's been the best part of 5 years that past & the management hasn't been able to bring decent revenue, but why complain the RSU are being issued for what?
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
How long is it supposed to take Dolci?
Which company are you using as a template to compare BrainChip's progress against?
Dolci
Regular
I am only stating what was said in the past by the management, & an explosion of revenue is coming from the founder........lol isn't that when you start to think that things will happen?
FJ-215
Regular
Hi Dolci,just wanted to see if you lot relised that the BUS has a flat tyre ....LOL
Maybe not so much a flat tyre, more like bogged in the mud. Lots of noise and engine revving coming from Steve Brightfield and the PR team in the last few months, followed by a hint of traction by the sales team. Need more to be pulled from the mire but it's a start.
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
But Dolci, you're making very good money trading it aren't you.
Your charts are telling you when to buy and sell on the rises and falls.
And your sentiment changes noticeably to negative when you have sold and are hoping/expecting the price to fall so you can buy in again at a lower price.
Then you only express positives when you hope/expect the price to rise so you can sell at a higher price.
Surely BRN is a dream stock for you to trade.
Beyond the flexible narrative you require to back your trading positions, what do you care about the success or not of the company?
Bravo
If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
True dat Hoppy! I clearly remember Dolci making pronouncements over there on the Crapper a few weeks ago about how BrainChip was on the up and up. I'd describe it as their sentiment changing a hell of a lot more frequently than their underpants.
Similar threads
