Yes the FAT TAIL court matter has been adjourned to the 25 FEB 2025 for a conference did NIGEL turn up this time..?Next hearing is 27/02/2025, again it is a "strategic conference"
Yes the FAT TAIL court matter has been adjourned to the 25 FEB 2025 for a conference did NIGEL turn up this time..?Next hearing is 27/02/2025, again it is a "strategic conference"
I wish all these COURT cases would go away just not a good look for AVZ could take years to come to a final decisionYes the FAT TAIL court matter has been adjourned to the 25 FEB 2025 for a conference did NIGEL turn up this time..?
Your account has remained unsuspended on Hotcrapper when you can bet your bottom dollar any other account would be long gone by now considering how you turned those forums into absolute trash with your trolling and spamming over the last 2 years . Of course you have just gotten temporarily suspended over there … but that’s beside the point .. your account would be long gone if it was anyone elseI wish all these COURT cases would go away just not a good look for AVZ could take years to come to a final decision
People love positive posts, it’s what they want to hear. But some posts are often more about gaining popularity than being realistic. The reality is, it’s a long road before retail holders see any return on this stock.
AVZ should have access to the Locke funding by the end of this month. However, have recent events jeopardized the Locke facility? Hard to say, but Graeme deleting that announcement from his LinkedIn might be a red flag...?
He has a professional following, he may want to make sure he provides accurate information. Deleting the Locke Funding announcement might mean nothing, we don’t know yet, but the first test of how serious the AFP action is? Whether AVZ can actually access those funds, we”ll find out soon enough.
The issue is they generate click and page views, which in turn generates ad income for the provider.Your account has remained unsuspended on Hotcrapper when you can bet your bottom dollar any other account would be long gone by now considering how you turned those forums into absolute trash with your trolling and spamming over the last 2 years . Of course you have just gotten temporarily suspended over there … but that’s beside the point .. your account would be long gone if it was anyone else
Now TSE seems to be very shy in suspending you and of course old mate gets the ********* special treatment when his name is typed in any post within these threads …
Who is the puppet master Tolate ; you can’t expect people to believe little old Tolate just glides under moderators radar un noticed considering the numbers of reports and also the number of posts that get moderated just for contradicting you.. pretty strange huh …
Whirlpool?PM anyone if there is a new forum we can go, because I am not putting up with this crap
Pull your finger out ZeebotTo add - if enough community report a post, it becomes automatically moderated until I review it. This means we are all effectively moderating 24/7!
How many reports are required before a troll gets booted, ffs.Pull your finger out Zeebot
Fuck off wanker.Maybe some would like to know costs for these Suspended ICSID matters that fees were not paid..?
If this is wrong please get back and correct this assumption..!
Estimated Costs for ICSID Arbitration:
- Initial Advances on Costs:
- ICSID typically requires an initial advance for arbitration proceedings.
- This amount often starts around $200,000–$300,000 per party, depending on the case's complexity.
- For both parties, AVZ may need to pay an estimated $400,000–$600,000 upfront.
So Sammy, if I understand your message correctly if we simply place the shitttt on ignore it shouldn't be creating any views is this correct and if so why aren't we just doing that? I'm fed up with everything being actioned on the basis of revenue rather than just an honest forum to discuss a stock. @Zeebot please pull your finger out and do what's right as to the reason TSE was first set up.The issue is they generate click and page views, which in turn generates ad income for the provider.
It's a juggle, block the troll who is bringing in page views by stiring up trouble at the risk of losing some members? Or block the troll and risk losing some ad revenue?
Yeh I checked on ecourts
View attachment 74402
Anyone out there have the ability to start a new forum where scum of the earth are not to enter because this one’s fucked@zeebot. Remove @tolate NOW. Somehow they have re-signed so your bullshit filters are way off. Mine and I suggest many more Memberships will be cancelled if they are around at the end of day.
TC.