equanimous
Norse clairvoyant shapeshifter goddess
Your behind on the times mate. Do some researchWhat’s the chances that better tech is already available but is black shelved.
Your behind on the times mate. Do some researchWhat’s the chances that better tech is already available but is black shelved.
Intel has hired Suk Lee, a former senior director of TSMC's design infrastructure marketing division in charge of TSMC's Open Innovation Platform, as its Ecosystem Development VP. Lee has been with TSMC for 13 years and was a vice president within the company's design infrastructure management division before leaving with Chang in June. He has a combined experience of 44 years working for TSMC
Strange accusation there.I thought I wouldn’t have to bring this up anymore.
This will be the last time I bring this up as I have voiced my concerns previously before the last AGM.
I think our chairman is trying play the strike down.
You know why the strike happened, you wouldn’t be doing the quarterly podcast if we shareholders didn’t voice our dissatisfaction and voted against.
It was never about the share price….it was about runs on the board and lack of communication with your shareholders.
I am sick and tired of hearing this is how the tech world operates and you Aussies need to comply with the way the USA traditionally operates.
We are listed on the asx…. You have Australian shareholders that have invested and have patiently waited to see revenue or IP deals.
I have no problem with incentives for employees, however I do have a problem when we sharesholders
Are not informed of anything.
I hope management take this on board.
That’s the last time I bring this up.
There will be another strike If we keep on getting treated this way.
Go BRN.
For a start the 2 IP deals were signed over 2 years ago.Strange accusation there.
You might want to check your post before submitting as you’re posting incorrect facts here.
- We operate in the ASX, American and Germany stock exchange
- We have had revenue come in but not as much as we like and we have 2 IP deals
- Who even said we need to comply with how the USA operates ( by the way all the tech giants are in USA)
I agree entirely with this. More transparency is needed as to where the company sites regarding negotiations and if negotiations actually exist. This silence is BS, we effectively own this company and have no idea what’s happening inside its walls, yet the bonuses keep rolling, the SP keeps dropping, and no new deals are being signed. It’s getting very old and I expect better accountability.For a start the 2 IP deals were signed over 2 years ago.
No new deals since then.
We are listed on the asx….not the nasdaq.
Have a bit of respect for the investors of the company and not play dumb to why they got the strike in the first place.
If this continues It will just become a boys club with fat salaries and bonus for no return to investors.
Instead of changing his approach after the strike at the last AGM he has continued rub shareholders up the wrong way.
He needs to stop playing dumb….the strike wasn’t because of the share price, it was because of no new IP deals.
I have always said the I’m not concerned about the share price for now.
If there’s no revenue, then they must sign new IP deals.
I will always love the company, however I will call out management BS when I see it.
I also tend to agree with most of what you expressed. As I mentioned in last post the BOD need to be more visible and even if they employ a specialist PR company and provide better communications to their shareholders then that's a great step and will be seen as a major positive. The current PR/ Marketing firm if there is one, ( I think it's JBR communications) honestly isn't up to the job and I honestly don't know what they have done for Brainchip. I'm on linkedin for my professional career and notice other emerging tech companies introduce and celebrate their key staff and communicate and share success stories within their companies and with their public audience. Yes we have these podcasts but it would be great if they're mixed with more effective communication channels to inform us, the part owners of Brainchip what's happening without breaching any NDA or disclosure requirements.For a start the 2 IP deals were signed over 2 years ago.
No new deals since then.
We are listed on the asx….not the nasdaq.
Have a bit of respect for the investors of the company and not play dumb to why they got the strike in the first place.
If this continues It will just become a boys club with fat salaries and bonus for no return to investors.
Instead of changing his approach after the strike at the last AGM he has continued rub shareholders up the wrong way.
He needs to stop playing dumb….the strike wasn’t because of the share price, it was because of no new IP deals.
I have always said the I’m not concerned about the share price for now.
If there’s no revenue, then they must sign new IP deals.
I will always love the company, however I will call out management BS when I see it.
There you go saying we have no revenue again. No revenue means 0. This is a lie you keep repeatingFor a start the 2 IP deals were signed over 2 years ago.
No new deals since then.
We are listed on the asx….not the nasdaq.
Have a bit of respect for the investors of the company and not play dumb to why they got the strike in the first place.
If this continues It will just become a boys club with fat salaries and bonus for no return to investors.
Instead of changing his approach after the strike at the last AGM he has continued rub shareholders up the wrong way.
He needs to stop playing dumb….the strike wasn’t because of the share price, it was because of no new IP deals.
I have always said the I’m not concerned about the share price for now.
If there’s no revenue, then they must sign new IP deals.
I will always love the company, however I will call out management BS when I see it.
Your first post was balanced and your second post about revenue was completely in denial.There you go saying we have no revenue again. No revenue means 0. This is a lie you keep repeating
Why not discuss it with Tony via email rather than hereYour first post was balanced and your second post about revenue was completely in denial.
We all know what I mean by no revenue.
By the way my rants this morning is because of first 6 mins of the quarterly podcast.
He mentioned that he has no idea why the strike happened.
He said it was because of share price……. Wrong
No IP deals and no REAL revenue!
They need to change their attitude otherwise they will expect another strike come next AGM.
I prefer to discuss it with my fellow shareholders on this forum.Why not discuss it with Tony via email rather than here
Is the consulting firm you are talking about?![]()
Computer Chip with a human-like brain
This could be a Skynet moment. Radical new silicon chip that will change the world.jwpm.com.au
Also the reason that no price sensitive announcement are being announced is because nothing price sensitive is happening I would assume because they are legally bound to announce if their were any that constitutes being price sensitive.
Sorry if I misunderstood the communication aspect of your post.
I don't know of any way to ascertain who actually voted for the strike on the remuneration package.Strange accusation there.
You might want to check your post before submitting as your posting incorrect facts here.
- We operate in the ASX, American and Germany stock exchange
- We have had revenue come in but not as much as we like and we have 2 IP deals
- Who even said we need to comply with how the USA operates ( by the way all the tech giants are in USA)
There appears to be a whole series regarding this. Wouldnt be surprised if this post gets deletedI don't know of any way to ascertain who actually voted for the strike on the remuneration package.
So as far as I am concerned the strike vote may have also come from institutional holders (who control a significant chunk of BRN equity), as well as retail, so correct me if I wrong on this, but does anyone actually know what number of "retail" holders voted to strike remuneration down.
Some further speculation, we know the instos have an integral role in shorting BRN, therefore could it be possible that some insto holders were involved in the remuneration package strike ?
But something else I have been thinking for sometime now: is it possible for instos, who are short selling or loaning BRN equities (for short selling purposes), to also be involved or have some relationship with my pet hate - which is the algorithmic trading bots that conduct high frequency trading of small share parcels all day on many ASX listed companies ?
Would that type of behaviour be illegal - you would think so, however I am not fully opposed to short trading but rather believe that it needs to be more regulated to prevent large insto holders attacking certain target companies for noxious or manipulative purposes (just a brief overview there).
Still I have wondered about the pairing of insto short selling campaigns combined with focussed Bot activity, nothing would surprise me, but if that were happening it would be pretty outrageous (and should absolutely be illegal if it isn't already), but I certainly know the notion of a level playing field has been totally bastardized, and am sensibly cynical when it comes to proper governance and scrutiny of market practices.
BOTS - Bastardization Of The Stocks.