cruiser51
Top 20
The shittyFair point . Something shifty is going on one way or another .
The shittyFair point . Something shifty is going on one way or another .
Fair point . Something shifty is going on one way or another .
I believe it should be the same for any update to the registry - inclusion or exiting.Hi 9cardomaha
Re: The only way a new party can be included into Dathcom and registered through RCCM is by holding a Dathcom AGM.
I am wondering if the removal of a partner, by whatever means, also requires a Dathcom meeting in order to formalise and ratify the new structure.
It is therefore reasonable to assume that Dathcom held an out-of-sessions meeting to formalise Jin Cheng's exit, and get the new partnership registered through RCCM.
Cheers
F
Let's assume Zijin is out .Fair point . Something shifty is going on one way or another .
You missed one fucking!Mate, there's ALWAYS something shifty going on. It's the D fucking R fucking C after all.
Why concerned?
This is the internet. Stop asking where it comes from. It is what it is, believe it or not is up to the individual. We've seen plenty of false dawns in AVZ and plenty of rumours and theories.
Best to take everything with a grain of salt.
the DOBs for the two DRC fellas at the end are the same too. not sure if its a clerical error at the RCCM or what, but its what i was given so there it is. If rumours of Zijin being out were formulated from this document then at least there was some evidence to back it up. But i got similar confirmations on Zijin being out of Dathcom through some deal (not sure what the deal is) - so its not as simple as the bird made it out to be.
I don't believe Zijin were forced/kicked out, but there was a deal for this 15%.
Same source that has provided me with other documentation including previous AVZ and Cominiere/Dathomir correspondence, old RCCM documents and more. Previous calls have mostly panned out as stated but it is the DRC so who fucking knows.
Not a stickler for details in the DRC maybe, but yeah, for all things AVZ i am also eating my fair share of salt. My aim is not to sway you to believe one thing or another, just to provide what I have.
Eitherway the document doesn't do anything in our hands, those with greater knowledge and decision making power could use it or try and verify it then give us an Ann. Who knows. Better than nothing, and in my book, i'm still sticking by my call that they are out, returning the 15% for a deal with the DRC on something else.
Further to this, the return of 15% also indicates that Cominiere doesn't have the power to terminate JVA nor does it have power to reallocate Manono to itself or other parties, and ultimately Dathcom still holds PR13359. Otherwise the return of 15% in Dathcom by Zijin doesn't have any weight in bargaining for other deals.
Take it or leave it, I will return to caveating my messages with this - forgot this time because i got swept up in the hype so apologies.
This document has been around for 8 days . AVZ BoD know share holders have a photo copy . If it is rubbish they will remain silent . Otherwise something has to give . With respect to 9cardomaha's point , I don't see why the ICC case in a few weeks will go ahead if the 15% has been surrendered . That to me will be the indicator whether this is another false flag . At least it's not too long wait to find out .Let's assume Zijin is out .
And returned the 15% .
The compensation case included Comminiere and Zijin are together at the ICC case for lost revenue.
How can this proceed now if Comminiere has been returned the 15% but is requested to transfer to another DRC mining company as Franck suggested.
Certainly hope they are out .
Fishy indeed .
Not necessarily. I agree with 9Card that even if Zijin have returned the 15%, it wasn't done unwillingly. There was no doubt a deal done. However this doesn't need to be a deal on some other unrelated benefit they can get from DRC, it could still be part of some for now unseen strategy regarding Manono. I just don't see then giving up at this point. The prize is too large and the cost relatively small - legal fees and some potential reputational risk. So if this were the case, they may not cancel their ICC cases which could fit into their previous delayance strategy.This document has been around for 8 days . AVZ BoD know share holders have a photo copy . If it is rubbish they will remain silent . Otherwise something has to give . With respect to 9cardomaha's point , I don't see why the ICC case in a few weeks will go ahead if the 15% has been surrendered . That to me will be the indicator whether this is another false flag . At least it's not too long wait to find out .
Zijin deserves a pineapple without lubrication, or simple the Chinese way, the bullet.If Zijin have returned or conceded any ownership of the 15%, PR05 could have just used a stick not a carrot. Lot's of chatter about warnings provided to Zijin prior to the visit to China.
Or of course, both a carrot AND a stick could have been used. I hope it was a big stick and a small carrot that PR05 repeatedly used on Zijin. (with no lubrication)
![]()
Gotta agree Nut, reading the bible makes more sense.Seriously these supposedly official fucked up documents with spelling errors and copy/paste birthdates are doing my fucking head in
Can't believe a fucking thing on the internet or coming out of the DRC
Jesus fucking Christ when are we going to get some official information on what the actual fuck is going on?????
Fuck me....
Seriously these supposedly official fucked up documents with spelling errors and copy/paste birthdates are doing my fucking head in
Can't believe a fucking thing on the internet or coming out of the DRC
Jesus fucking Christ when are we going to get some official information on what the actual fuck is going on?????
Fuck me....
Please don't take this the wrong way, but Put a cork in it buddy!Can't help but think and look back on some of Nigel's interviews over the years outlining how efficient the govt was and how good relations were even mentioning MoP directly. Nigel is in a world of shit if he cannot pull a positive outcome for shareholders. Also, both him and Greame would be wealthy in their own right but imagine if they lost the lot at the end of their careers + reputational damage - c'mon boys lets get something going
This is what I've been wondering also Fox. Why does everyone assume zijn 'got' something like n return for pulling out?If Zijin have returned or conceded any ownership of the 15%, PR05 could have just used a stick not a carrot. Lot's of chatter about warnings provided to Zijin prior to the visit to China.
Or of course, both a carrot AND a stick could have been used. I hope it was a big stick and a small carrot that PR05 repeatedly used on Zijin. (with no lubrication)
![]()
Can't help but think and look back on some of Nigel's interviews over the years outlining how efficient the govt was and how good relations were even mentioning MoP directly. Nigel is in a world of shit if he cannot pull a positive outcome for shareholders. Also, both him and Greame would be wealthy in their own right but imagine if they lost the lot at the end of their careers + reputational damage - c'mon boys lets get something going