Maybe this has already been posted today, not really sure.
Tech x
Tech x
Same company, different fund.
Invest | Plato Investment Management
plato.com.au
About - Team | Plato Investment Management
plato.com.au
It has been noted on several occasions that the company issues the Press Releases on their corporate Web site. I have also seen this particular article appear in the news feed for BRCHF on Fidelity's platform and from Reuters. I consider neither of those sources to be social media.This.
Many (including myself) don’t use socials - so to rely on this as a primary method of coms is unacceptable. How many have sold because they just aren’t receiving news to build confidence? The stocks primary listing is on the ASX and this should be the mechanism for company progress announcements. Other companies manage this, why cant we?!
You are absolutely wanted here. Please report Rockets post. Abuse is not tolerated.I beg your pardon? Wtf are you on about?
Surely going to the website of the company you are thinking of investing is not unreasonable.
Don't we want to spread news to people who aren't yet thinking of investing?
Let us be honest who cares what Plato writes today. If they shorted BRN it was a while ago and now goes hard writing so they can cover. I mean it's pretty silly if he just got on a short now after an 80 % correction lol. Does not have much real l to make.Ok, understood. Well sorry, not sorry, to anyone invested in Plato, though, because that ill-advised marketing campaign on the part of Dave Allen has surely just gotten them into a world of legal hurt.
All i want to know is who is their legal representation and is that firm publicly listed because I'm going to invest in them with what practically feels like insider knowledge right now as I suspect Plato might end up responsible for a significant revenue boost for that firm over the coming year or so!
Seriously, I'm writing to BRN & WBT and sending them the published content and asking them to have their own legal representation review it, advise the Board and, hopefully, challenge Plato forthwith on the manner in which they've chosen to present this, specifically naming BRN & WBT and yet being vague af on the metrics by which they've assessed them - they've practically alleged corporate fraud, or at least that's how it's certainly coming across. The "Clayton's" type!
If those invested in BRN are not absolutely ropeable about this then I don't even know what to say. This absolutely cannot be left unchallenged.
Can your first album be called Akida Ballista?If BRN ever puts me into a position to follow my music making dream, then i will officially make my stage name DJ Brainchip Holdings
Right, so while some are bickering about Bacon Lover being a bully, which is bullycrap by the way, I'm going to get a little excited by Ant 61 using AKIDA. I can already see the news articles surrounding the satellite robot. Everyone knows about satellites and space junk so the general public will love this, or at least understand it. What's more important though is NASA (and other space agencies) undoubted interest in a technology that can reduce the amount of space junk that is created. Space junk is a huge threat to satellites and manned space missions alike. If NASA is using AKIDA for other purposes then I'm feeling some potential space ubiquity building here. There's also the possibility that AKIDA can be used to enhance the current tracking process of the said 'junk'....did I say ubiquitous?
It’s not managements job to drive 5km under the speed limit or stop prematurely at an intersection, it’s their job to drive professionally and optimally. If they sped and got a ticket, then in future do the limit, don’t drive under it. This is why they earn the big salaries, this is whey they were engaged in the first place. Many other companies on the ASX have zero issues announcing partnerships - there’s literally a mechanism for this… it’s called a non-price sensitive announcement.It has been noted on several occasions that the company issues the Press Releases on their corporate Web site. I have also seen this particular article appear in the news feed for BRCHF on Fidelity's platform and from Reuters. I consider neither of those sources to be social media.
It has been stated that because they had received a warning from the ASX so they are erring on the side of caution.
A similar anecdote, I once got a ticket for running a red light because I entered the intersection after the traffic light turned yellow. Now when I approach an intersection even when very close, and the light turns yellow, I end up slowing (sometimes rather quickly) and stopping.
Because of my negative experience, I've been conditioned to do this. It torques several drivers behind me and once got me rear-ended because the person tailgating me expected me to run it like many others.
I don't blame BRN for this. I blame the use of officiousness that drove them to be this cautious in the first place.
It’s not managements job to drive 5km under the speed limit or stop prematurely at an intersection, it’s their job to drive professionally and optimally. If they sped and got a ticket, then in future do the limit, don’t drive under it. This is why they earn the big salaries, this is whey they were engaged in the first place. Many other companies on the ASX have zero issues announcing partnerships - there’s literally a mechanism for this… it’s called a non-price sensitive announcement.
As an investor, it isn’t my job to check the website for updates, it’s the companies to ensure I’m made aware of that information. This is done via the ASX, and distributed by my trading platform. The system was designed to work this was and every other company on the ASX runs this way - why are we any different?
I used the stop light as an example because it's more concrete than driving a variated speed limit. It's either I stop when the light turns yellow (because I can get a ticket for running a red light) or go through it. If the company was approached for posting news, then maybe it was done at a frequency they didn't like. If they don't communicate how frequently they can post information, then the reaction will be to post none at all.It’s not managements job to drive 5km under the speed limit or stop prematurely at an intersection, it’s their job to drive professionally and optimally. If they sped and got a ticket, then in future do the limit, don’t drive under it. This is why they earn the big salaries, this is whey they were engaged in the first place. Many other companies on the ASX have zero issues announcing partnerships - there’s literally a mechanism for this… it’s called a non-price sensitive announcement.
As an investor, it isn’t my job to check the website for updates, it’s the companies to ensure I’m made aware of that information. This is done via the ASX, and distributed by my trading platform. The system was designed to work this was and every other company on the ASX runs this way - why are we any different?